On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:53 PM Balló György via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Then if it's okay, I would like to add the following [community] packages
> to groups based on upstream sources:
> - gnome-boxes (gnome)
> - gnome-multi-writer (gnome-extra)
> - gnome-recipes
Then if it's okay, I would like to add the following [community] packages
to groups based on upstream sources:
- gnome-boxes (gnome)
- gnome-multi-writer (gnome-extra)
- gnome-recipes (gnome-extra)
- gnome-software (gnome)
- parole (xfce4-goodies)
- simple-scan (gnome)
--
György Balló
Trusted
On 04/01/18 22:02, Balló György via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Currently the 'xfce4-goodies' package group[1] is in split between [extra]
> and [community]. Most of its packages are in [extra], but 'ristretto' and
> 'xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin' are in [community].
>
> My question is: is it okay, or
On 2018-01-04 13:02, Balló György via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Currently the 'xfce4-goodies' package group[1] is in split between [extra]
> and [community]. Most of its packages are in [extra], but 'ristretto' and
> 'xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin' are in [community].
>
> My question is: is it okay, or
Currently the 'xfce4-goodies' package group[1] is in split between [extra]
and [community]. Most of its packages are in [extra], but 'ristretto' and
'xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin' are in [community].
My question is: is it okay, or should we avoid it by removing these two
packages from the
5 matches
Mail list logo
