Re: [arch-dev-public] proposal to add "aurpublish" to community
On 07/20/18 at 09:05am, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 07/19/18 at 07:23pm, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: > > On Wed 18.07.18 - 15:28, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > I would like to add this to [community], but I'm unsure what people > > > think about this; specifically, whether this might come too close to > > > "supporting the AUR via [community] packages". Note that this is *not* > > > an AUR helper and is strictly a tool for package *maintainers* to use > > > during the process of uploading. > > > > Uploaders are fine by me and I think we had one in previously. > > From what I can recall, we had one in, some discussion and it was gone > again. I'll try to find the post in the archives. > Gotcha, it was cower. [1] [1] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010-December/012763.html -- Jelle van der Waa signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] proposal to add "aurpublish" to community
On 07/19/18 at 07:23pm, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Wed 18.07.18 - 15:28, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > > I would like to add this to [community], but I'm unsure what people > > think about this; specifically, whether this might come too close to > > "supporting the AUR via [community] packages". Note that this is *not* > > an AUR helper and is strictly a tool for package *maintainers* to use > > during the process of uploading. > > Uploaders are fine by me and I think we had one in previously. From what I can recall, we had one in, some discussion and it was gone again. I'll try to find the post in the archives. -- Jelle van der Waa signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] proposal to add "aurpublish" to community
On Wed 18.07.18 - 15:28, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > I would like to add this to [community], but I'm unsure what people > think about this; specifically, whether this might come too close to > "supporting the AUR via [community] packages". Note that this is *not* > an AUR helper and is strictly a tool for package *maintainers* to use > during the process of uploading. Uploaders are fine by me and I think we had one in previously. Florian signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[arch-dev-public] proposal to add "aurpublish" to community
Hi, so for a while now I've been using a tool I wrote at https://github.com/eli-schwartz/aurpublish -- recently split out from a vendored script in https://github.com/eli-schwartz/pkgbuilds -- to maintain my AUR packages. Some of you will probably have heard about it before. :) I certainly think it's a nifty tool :D and apparently a number of other people do too. It makes things faster and simpler, and especially prevents people from accidentally uploading PKGBUILDs with out of date .SRCINFO which is obviously a huge plus... I would like to add this to [community], but I'm unsure what people think about this; specifically, whether this might come too close to "supporting the AUR via [community] packages". Note that this is *not* an AUR helper and is strictly a tool for package *maintainers* to use during the process of uploading. What do you all think? -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
