On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 03:39 +0200, Balló György via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> I agree with this, and the same apply for vlc I think, which recently
> lost
> its qt4 dependency:
> https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packag
> es/vlc=b1a56bb8d107ebb51a6f2e32c67f866e2693517b
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 21:24 +0200, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Am 2016-06-30 09:41, schrieb Johannes Löthberg via arch-dev-public:
> > That has actually come up on IRC a lot of times over the last
> > couple
> > years, users asking how to sign-off packages / if they can help
> >
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 21:44 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> Actually, why don't raise the bar higher? SSE2 has been introduced in
> 2001 – that's 15 years to upgrade one's hardware and given my sad
> experiences with computers, I find it hard to believe anyone has that
> old PC that happens
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 21:12 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> On 2016-09-28 05:10, Allan McRae wrote:
> >
> > The most pressing issue is #1. So lets get back to the issue of the
> > increasing amount of software requiring SSE2. How do we solve this?
>
> I thought about it, and I lean
> I need time to fix this. It is probably just test suite assumptions
> rather than errors.
Could we start with the changes other than PIE? Those won't need any
immediate rebuilds.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 11:07 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> On 2016-10-24 05:56, Allan McRae wrote:
> > 1) building gcc to enable PIE by default
>
> I am in the middle of rebuilding gcc with --enable-default-pie. When
> it
> finishes, I will start a todo for rebuilding packages with static
Anyway, I think -Wl,-z,now, --enable-default-pie and --enable-default-
ssp are a good starting point.
Could enable -fstack-check=specific now, but it's not going to save a
mass rebuild by doing it now (if the goal is to rebuild everything
important with it) because they'll be improving it.
Using
On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 08:32 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 02/07/17 06:51, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 2017-06-30 23:44, Allan McRae wrote:
> > > On 30/06/17 19:07, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> > > > On 2016-10-24 05:56, Allan McRae wrote:
> > > > > 1) building gcc to enable PIE by
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 21:06 +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 5 July 2017 at 19:51, Daniel Micay <danielmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 12:36 +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> > > On 2 July 2017 at 19:19, Daniel Micay via arch-dev-public
> > &g
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 12:36 +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 2 July 2017 at 19:19, Daniel Micay via arch-dev-public
> <arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > Using -fno-plt would be a nice tiny little performance boost at
> > runtime
> > but then it's imp
> So I think it would be a good idea to flip the default to -z,now in
> the
> linker if we're going to use -fno-plt. I think they'd take a patch for
> that upstream. Clang issue could be avoided with a 1 line patch adding
> another no-op flag and they'd take that upstream. It's harmless to use
>
11 matches
Mail list logo