Re: [arch-dev-public] db6 rebuild dropped - new ToDo list

2014-02-08 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 20 August 2013 00:08, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am 19.08.2013 08:20, schrieb Gaetan Bisson: >> [2013-08-10 11:47:50 +0200] Andreas Radke: >>> Berkeley db5 won't see much further updates if any at all. We should >>> check each package that now links to it if that functionality is >>> essentially r

Re: [arch-dev-public] db6 rebuild dropped - new ToDo list

2013-08-19 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am 19.08.2013 08:20, schrieb Gaetan Bisson: > [2013-08-10 11:47:50 +0200] Andreas Radke: >> Berkeley db5 won't see much further updates if any at all. We should >> check each package that now links to it if that functionality is >> essentially required. > > For postfix, it is not strictly required

Re: [arch-dev-public] db6 rebuild dropped - new ToDo list

2013-08-19 Thread Tobias Powalowski
For pam it is only used for pam_userdb.so module. It's not active in the default /etc/pam.d/ files so probably we can just drop it. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: Op

Re: [arch-dev-public] db6 rebuild dropped - new ToDo list

2013-08-18 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2013-08-10 11:47:50 +0200] Andreas Radke: > Berkeley db5 won't see much further updates if any at all. We should > check each package that now links to it if that functionality is > essentially required. For postfix, it is not strictly required, but upgrading to a db-free postfix will require use

[arch-dev-public] db6 rebuild dropped - new ToDo list

2013-08-10 Thread Andreas Radke
Due to the license change in db5 (MIT style) to db6 (AGPLv3) we drop the db6 update and will keep db5 in core for now. Berkeley db5 won't see much further updates if any at all. We should check each package that now links to it if that functionality is essentially required. I'm going to remove al