On 20 August 2013 00:08, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am 19.08.2013 08:20, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
>> [2013-08-10 11:47:50 +0200] Andreas Radke:
>>> Berkeley db5 won't see much further updates if any at all. We should
>>> check each package that now links to it if that functionality is
>>> essentially r
Am 19.08.2013 08:20, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
> [2013-08-10 11:47:50 +0200] Andreas Radke:
>> Berkeley db5 won't see much further updates if any at all. We should
>> check each package that now links to it if that functionality is
>> essentially required.
>
> For postfix, it is not strictly required
For pam it is only used for pam_userdb.so module.
It's not active in the default /etc/pam.d/ files so probably we can just
drop it.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: Op
[2013-08-10 11:47:50 +0200] Andreas Radke:
> Berkeley db5 won't see much further updates if any at all. We should
> check each package that now links to it if that functionality is
> essentially required.
For postfix, it is not strictly required, but upgrading to a db-free
postfix will require use
Due to the license change in db5 (MIT style) to db6 (AGPLv3) we drop
the db6 update and will keep db5 in core for now.
Berkeley db5 won't see much further updates if any at all. We should
check each package that now links to it if that functionality is
essentially required.
I'm going to remove al
5 matches
Mail list logo