On 12/18/2009 01:33 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
Go tohttp://enigmail.mozdev.org/download/index.php you'll be able to
put in the combination linux (x86_64) and Thunderbird 3.0 (thanks
to a fellow Arch user it seems :-)
That's the add-on I'm using at home. Do note that the reports of
Le 19/12/2009 10:00, David C. Rankin a écrit :
On 12/18/2009 06:30 AM, Thomas Jost wrote:
Hi there,
I'm the maintainer of the enigmail package on AUR, and I've contributed
x86_64 builds of Enigmail since the 0.95.7 release.
The .xpi on the website is built using the AUR package, so both are
I did this to solve my mount permission problem caused by hal.
Solution was to add “session optional pam_ck_connector.so” to
“/etc/pam.d/login”.
That was the tip found on this
threadhttp://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=84635p=3.
But I don't use kde kdm though. Using xfce. No login manager.
On 18/12/09 12:30, Thomas Jost wrote:
Le 18/12/2009 08:33, Magnus Therning a écrit :
[..]
That's the add-on I'm using at home. Do note that the reports of
incompatibility between lightning and enigmail are fully true, i.e. have
both add-ons enabled and you'll loose some text in your menu,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 2:47 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
All depends on what the ultimate goals for the distro are. Me? I wouldn't
change a thing. I like Arch the way it is and I hope it stays like this
until I'm old and gray (sh... I'm getting there ;-)
I don't
Make sure that the permissions are set correctly for console kit via the KDE
system settings applet. This was my problem with automount awhile back.
On Dec 19, 2009 12:50 PM, Abdullah Zainul Abidin
abdullah.zai...@gmail.com wrote:
I did this to solve my mount permission problem caused by hal.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 02:26:56PM -0600, Jonathan Temple wrote:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 2:47 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Personally, I don't think all the money in the world would be worth
sacrificing the niche Arch has carved out for itself in the Linux
Le jeudi 17 à 20:35, Dieter Plaetinck a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:33:22 -0500
Denis Kobozev d.v.kobo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
did that guy actually say that point and click visual installers
are a time *saver* ??
I always liked the Arch installer from the 0.7 days. I used to be able to
setup an entire system in less than ten minutes and be ready to do work. The
latest Arch installer makes it take more like fifteen minutes instead. Of
course, that older Arch didn't have to cope with initcpio or any other
Le vendredi 18 à 10:24, RedShift a écrit :
Things like enumerating all hardware
devices, configuring a network interface, drawing a window, ejecting
the CD-ROM drive, getting notified about new hardware plugged in,
etc... It's different on every operating system.
Le samedi 19 à 22:59, Dieter Plaetinck a écrit :
You've never installed Debian/Ubuntu with a preseed.cfg file that
answer all the questions for you (or, at your option, as many or as
few questions as you wish)? You've never used FAI (Fully Automated
Installed) either?
I have used FAI
On Saturday 19 December 2009 15:29:58 Robert Howard wrote:
Make sure that the permissions are set correctly for console kit via the
KDE system settings applet. This was my problem with automount awhile
back.
I don't understand what your saying.
I looked at the KDE systems app and I don't see
12 matches
Mail list logo
