On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:05 AM, David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net wrote:
On Thu, April 8, 2010 9:51 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
So WTF?!?!?!? Hal sees the keyboard. And xev running inside the x
session sees the keyboard. SO WHY ON EARTH IS MY KEYBOARD STILL DEAD IN
MY X
On 04/04/2010 04:56 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
snip
Things todo before this merges to extra:
- Add documentation about input configuration to our wiki, as hal is
deprecated now
- Ask nvidia for a driver that works without ignoreABI, I'm sure they
can give us a timeframe for that
- Add xorg.conf.d
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 09:34 -0400, pyther wrote:
Has there been any work on a wiki entry for Xorg 1.8? I don't see
anything on the main wiki. I just don't want to duplicate efforts.
Cheers!
Nothing has been done on documentation yet. Feel free to use the
documentation from Fedora to
2010/4/9 David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net:
* I'm getting a load of errors in the slim.log file that look like this:
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_1 line 8 of xfree86
W T F ? ! ?
Not sure it's the same problem, but I experienced something similar a
while ago... and I couldn't
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, bardo ilba...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/9 David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net:
* I'm getting a load of errors in the slim.log file that look like this:
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_1 line 8 of xfree86
W T F ? ! ?
Not sure it's the same problem, but
Hi,
I got this pacman error just now, when I wanted to upgrade to 2.6.33.
# pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: kqemu: requires kernel262.6.33
:: madwifi:
On Friday 09 April 2010 16:09:12 Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Hi,
I got this pacman error just now, when I wanted to upgrade to 2.6.33.
# pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could
On 04/09/2010 06:11 AM, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:05 AM, David Rosenstrauchdar...@darose.net wrote:
On Thu, April 8, 2010 9:51 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
So WTF?!?!?!? Hal sees the keyboard. And xev running inside the x
session sees the keyboard. SO WHY ON
Just noticed today that all the comments are gone from the AUR pages.
Is that intentional? Or if not, is there any way to get them restored?
Thanks,
DR
On 04/09/2010 09:54 AM, bardo wrote:
2010/4/9 David Rosenstrauchdar...@darose.net:
* I'm getting a load of errors in the slim.log file that look like this:
expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_1 line 8 of xfree86
W T F ? ! ?
Not sure it's the same problem, but I experienced something
On Friday 09 April 2010 16:16:56 David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Just noticed today that all the comments are gone from the AUR pages.
Is that intentional? Or if not, is there any way to get them restored?
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/a ur-general/2010-March/008528.html
--
Andrea |
Am 09.04.2010 16:15, schrieb Andrea Scarpino:
:: kqemu: requires kernel262.6.33
:: madwifi: requires kernel262.6.33
I removed both these packages and the upgrade is proceeding. Just a heads
up for others who actually need these packages. I don't know why I had
madwifi as there is no wireless
On 04/09/2010 09:41 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 09:34 -0400, pyther wrote:
Has there been any work on a wiki entry for Xorg 1.8? I don't see
anything on the main wiki. I just don't want to duplicate efforts.
Cheers!
Nothing has been done on documentation yet. Feel
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 16:01 -0400, pyther wrote:
Alright I started editing the wiki. The majority of the changes were
made under the configuration section. I pretty much copied verbatim
the
InputClasses section. If someone can look over them and possibly
improve
the wiki I would
On 04/09/2010 05:20 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
In case there's anything related to hwd in there: kill it. We don't
support hwd as X.org configuration tool. The best autoconfiguration tool
you can get is Xorg -configure, and these days even that is not needed
anymore.
Done.
Any opinion on the
It would appear that on Apr 8, Isaac Dupree did say:
On 04/08/10 07:21, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
My take on it is that while it's always a good idea to be using a
current install medium, with Arch it only matters that your system is
able to become current via update. The release of a
16 matches
Mail list logo
