2011/4/30 Nicolás Adamo nicoad...@gmail.com
Hi! Does anyone have any clue about this?
[nico@myhost ~]$ blender -d
Blender 2.49 (sub 2) Build
argv[0] = blender
argv[1] = -d
Compiled with Python version 2.7.1.
Checking for installed Python... got it!
Color depth r 5 g 6 b 5
Aux buffers: 0
On 30-04-2011 00:51, Loui Chang wrote:
Sounds like a hardware problem then. Maybe the bios should tell the OS
if the clock is in localtime or UTC. ;)
Not really, the real time clock is a clock, it is supposed to keep the
time always moving forward in the most accurate way possible, ideally it
Stan (2011-04-30 07:25):
On 03:01 Sat 30 Apr , Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Does it happen every time? I'm thinking about dmenu_path, which causes a
delay when it's run, but I don't see the connection to gfx drivers..
Yes. But with long lines(50 symbols, i think). If i continue pressing
On 30/04/11 08:47, Dan McGee wrote:
The correct solution to me would be:
1. add another custom tablesort ordering; see archweb.js for our
current listing of them.
http://projects.archlinux.org/archweb.git/tree/media/archweb.js#n5
2. Make the attribute template tag itself smarter and always
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote:
My understanding: Let initscripts start bluetoothd and not udev (it
should not use to manage services).
I have been looking a bit more into this (reading the discussions on
the bluez mailinglist). From what I can see Sebastien is
Good day,
Is there any way to force makepkg to build a PKGBUILD-svn with a fixed
svn version? version 133 of periscope-svn is broken and I want to go
back to version 132.
Thanks
2011/4/30 Juan Diego Tascón juantas...@gmail.com:
Is there any way to force makepkg to build a PKGBUILD-svn with a fixed
svn version? version 133 of periscope-svn is broken and I want to go
back to version 132.
The option you're looking for is --holdver. It is described in makepkg(8).
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/30 Juan Diego Tascón juantas...@gmail.com:
Is there any way to force makepkg to build a PKGBUILD-svn with a fixed
svn version? version 133 of periscope-svn is broken and I want to go
back to version 132.
The
## GNOME 3.0.1 is being moved in [extra]
This is a major update and you should take note of a couple of things:
* GNOME3 is replacing GNOME2
* GNOME3 has two modes, standard mode (gnome-shell) and fallback
mode (gnome-panel + metacity)
* Some packages, like applets using Bonobo, will be
Hello,
I just wanted to remove and install again some pkg because something screwed..
I run
$ sudo pacman -Rd pm-utils
checking dependencies...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: upower: requires pm-utils
AFAIK this was the point of -d (--nodeps) to remove
-d ignores version numbers -dd versions and names (the old -d)
On Saturday 30 of April 2011 22:12:53 jesse jaara wrote:
-d ignores version numbers -dd versions and names (the old -d)
Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention
the -dd then I read the text carefully.. :P
But maybe the -dd should be mentioned in the text? (not
Am Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:32:17 +0200
schrieb Marek Otahal markota...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 30 of April 2011 22:12:53 jesse jaara wrote:
-d ignores version numbers -dd versions and names (the old -d)
Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to
mention the -dd then I
Has the site have an English version? I'd like to look into packages page,
and the aur packages page as well, to see if it make sense to try it out...
I moved back to debian some time back precisely cause arch was all for x86,
so I didn't think it was going to support the lemote mini-pcs neither
Marek Otahal wrote:
Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to mention
the -dd then I read the text carefully..
Don't bother, its already changed in git.
Greg
On 04/30/2011 04:52 PM, javier wrote:
Has the site have an English version? I'd like to look into packages page,
and the aur packages page as well, to see if it make sense to try it out...
I moved back to debian some time back precisely cause arch was all for x86,
so I didn't think it was
It's not that I really have money to give away, but I was struck by the
notice on the Arch web site that financial contributions are not currently
accepted, although they have been in the past. Given that there has
apparently been some discussion of lack of resources for the distro, it
seems to
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Bill Day williamson@gmail.com wrote:
It's not that I really have money to give away, but I was struck by the
notice on the Arch web site that financial contributions are not currently
accepted, although they have been in the past. Given that there has
On 01.05.2011 04:13, Ray Kohler wrote:
I also have donated in the past, and would do so again if it were made possible.
What about a normal bank transfer to one of Arch's core maintainers?
19 matches
Mail list logo
