+According to Leon Feng:
Systemd support shortform service name now. See the wiki page:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd#Using_Units
For now, this only seems to work for starting, stopping and reloading
services. Unfortunately it doesn't yet seem to work for enabling or
On 08/17/2012 04:37 PM, Justin Strickland wrote:
If I recall correctly I don't believe you would have to modify any program to
work with systemd, the only thing you'd have to do is create a unit for it.
(Though I could be wrong please correct me if I'm wrong.)_
It is better if programs are
According to Rodrigo Rivas:
One last idea. Maybe the gnome-settings-daemon is playing dumb with your
sound. I think you can disable the sound plugin of g-s-d using dconf
(org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.sound.active).
I tried
dconf write org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/sound/active false
On 2012/8/17 Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas MIller nick.k...@gmail.comwrote:
That seems to be one of the more well thought out (not pro), responces to
systemd,
Thank you. My intent was to start an intelligent discussion. The rants and
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Kyle k...@gmx.ca wrote:
According to Rodrigo Rivas:
One last idea. Maybe the gnome-settings-daemon is playing dumb with your
sound. I think you can disable the sound plugin of g-s-d using dconf
(org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.sound.active).
I tried
On 2012/8/16 Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Lennart said systemd will only ever run on Linux and is only designed
for a full fledged Fedora but is useful on embedded too. However I
don't think he realised what level the Linux embedded world could
expand to.
As far as I know,
Hello.
Yesterday, I wanted to test systemd, and all worked well, thanks to the wiki.
For this test, I used a VirtualBox machine with archlinux in it. I
didn't want to bust my main computer.
There is big problem. Audio is not working.
Every single time sound is needed, I got something like this
Have you unmuted the channels?
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:45 AM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
while the volume was at the proper level. At this point, I am totally
stumped. The computer I had that died used a SoundBlaster Live Value, and
although the sound started out muted, restoring the alsa volumes always
2012/8/18 Jesse Jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com:
Have you unmuted the channels?
All channels are activated.
I will try systemctl start alsa-restore and see... But that's weird :(
--
Frederic Bezies
fredbez...@gmail.com
Have you unmuted the sound card's own channels too? And not just the
pulseaudio's.
2012/8/18 Jesse Jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com:
Have you unmuted the sound card's own channels too? And not just the
pulseaudio's.
Both pulseaudio and sound cards channels are unmuted.
--
Frederic Bezies
fredbez...@gmail.com
2012/8/18 Jesse Jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com:
Have you unmuted the sound card's own channels too? And not just the
pulseaudio's.
Stinks like a virtualbox bug.
Alsamixer shows me that all channels (both pulseaudio and sound card
ones) are opened and 100% volume.
And when I enter, either in
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:05:27PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
In all of the discussion about systemd, all anyone should care about is:
(1) Does systemd provide *needed* additional capabilities that are not
currently available;
(2) What are they?
(3) What are the disadvantages
2012/8/18 Jesse Jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com:
Have you unmuted the sound card's own channels too? And not just the
pulseaudio's.
It is a virtualbox bug. Verified in qemu, and sound it working, even
if qemu is very slow with gnome shell.
--
Frederic Bezies
fredbez...@gmail.com
Lennart said systemd will only ever run on Linux and is only designed
for a full fledged Fedora but is useful on embedded too. However I
don't think he realised what level the Linux embedded world could
expand to.
As far as I know, Archlinux does not target non-x86 embedded
It is a virtualbox bug.
It probably is but that is no certainty. Virtualbox is or was atleast a
good example of how a user loved and useful software can still be far
from good and safe code correctness.
The project leader of OpenBSD had a bug report and eventually found it
was virtualbox's
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:11:58 +1000
John Briggs johne...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
snipped wisdom
As I have said in a previous post, I arrived in linux a little later than you,
but for much the same reasons. On KISS / The Arch Way / Unix philosophy
etc, it seems to me that here as in my own field
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 07:27:29PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Hi guys,
As most devs have done already, I'm going to change my relationship
with arch-general. This probably does not matter to most of you, so
sorry for the noise. Then again, it might be a useful reminder about
how most devs
hello,
i am moving to a dorm soon and i plan on using a archlinux box as a
router. to keep from messing with iptables every 5 seconds, i was
wondering if there was a good, easy to setup upnp server.
On 2012/8/18 John Briggs johne...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
IMHO systemd is unnecessarily complex in trying to do too many separate
tasks.
I don't understand why you are saying that. The systemd project may be
larger than a small utility, but it is composed of:
* multiple, small utilities that do
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Shridhar Daithankar
ghodech...@ghodechhap.net wrote:
Hello,
I am having trouble with time on a machine when I boot with systemd. The
clock
is ahead of actual time by the value of time zone offset.
Funny thing is when I boot with initscripts, time is
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Shridhar Daithankar
ghodech...@ghodechhap.net wrote:
Hello,
I am having trouble with time on a machine when I boot with systemd. The
clock
is ahead of actual time by the value of time zone offset.
Funny thing is when I boot with initscripts, time is
i am moving to a dorm soon and i plan on using a archlinux box as a
router. to keep from messing with iptables every 5 seconds, i was
wondering if there was a good, easy to setup upnp server.
Why not have two nics, one that allows incoming to any ports you may
ever want and one that doesn't.
i do, but you already need one facing the internet and one facing the
intranet.
On Aug 18, 2012 9:57 AM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
i am moving to a dorm soon and i plan on using a archlinux box as a
router. to keep from messing with iptables every 5 seconds, i was
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Shridhar Daithankar
ghodech...@ghodechhap.net wrote:
Hello,
I am having trouble with time on a machine when I boot with systemd. The clock
is ahead of actual time by the value of time zone offset.
Funny thing is when I boot with initscripts, time is reported
to clarify a little (and bump), im talking about the UPnP IGD protocol. if
there isnt a good server out there, then even a link to a clear explanation
of the protocol would be nice, IIRC the RFC was more difficult to
understand than most
On Aug 18, 2012 10:11 AM, Zachary (Asian)
As a long term, quite silent user, the systemd drama does not struck me as
special, new or exceedingly dramatic. I remember analogous, heated
discussions also when the arch community was much smaller. E.g., I remember
a devfs --- udev transition drama, and a monolithic xfree --- modular
xorg one.
On Saturday 18 Aug 2012 8:04:58 PM Keshav P R wrote:
Your problem might be due to RTC (motherboard) clock being in local
time (generally the case if you dual-boot with Windows. Systemd
assumes that RTC is in UTC, but in case of initscripts it can be
configured to be localtime. Hence the time
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:11:58PM +1000, John Briggs wrote:
IMHO the cost of Linux embracing complexity is a loss of freedom. We must
all decide personally if we are willing to pay this price or we remain true
to the principles of GNU/Linux and abandon this type of software.
At this time we
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:03:55PM +0100, Geoff wrote:
As I have said in a previous post, I arrived in linux a little later than you,
but for much the same reasons. On KISS / The Arch Way / Unix philosophy
etc, it seems to me that here as in my own field (law), maxims make good
servants but
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 01:52:59PM +0200, R??my Oudompheng wrote:
I don't understand why you are saying that.
I can't speak for him but I can tell you why I say it.
Parsing a config file is _always_ unnecessary complexity. It
is where some of the biggest bugs lurk. It hurts the
functional
All,
When attempting to build in an archroot this morning, the build failed due to
unknown trust signatures on perl packages. Can I pass an argument to
makechrootpkg to overcome the error? The error were as follows (email blanked):
Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
checking package
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 02:32:04PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
All,
When attempting to build in an archroot this morning, the build failed due
to
unknown trust signatures on perl packages. Can I pass an argument to
makechrootpkg to overcome the error? The error were as follows (email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/2012 02:38 PM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
you need to update the chroots archlinux-keyring, because the old key
expired
also, try extra-$arch-build to automatically build from a clean chroot
Thank you Daniel,
That is what happened. I'll
Matthew Monaco dgbale...@0x01b.net wrote:
On 08/17/2012 04:14 PM, Ben Booth wrote:
Don't know if you did this by accident -- and not a huge deal -- but you
shouldn't have included the vote action in the link.
Oops, my mistake. In any case, the request was rejected. :(
Hi, I use linux-igd on Debian, the Arch package is at
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12319 I cannot attest to how
well it works on Arch, however I'm sure it's similar. Very easy to set
up, just putting the interfaces you want it to listen on, in the conf
file and it does the rest. I use
37 matches
Mail list logo
