On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Simon Perry a...@sanxion.net wrote:
I'm using netcfg@eth0.service to configure a static IP, however it seems
that systemd insists on starting dhcpcd, and this screws up my
resolv.conf.
You're probably still using initscripts compatibility, so systemd is
loading
I'm facing the same problem, but the solution doesn't seem to be working
for me.
I had a *.pacnew only for login in /etc/pam.d, which I renamed. But still
the applet refuses to work for me. :(
Any other ideas?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:12 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
On Mon,
Seems I forgot to add the usb hook. It works now. Thank you for replying and
directing my attention towards mkinitcpio.
Hello everybody,
I just updated an old system and had to go through the lib - usr/lib move. I
did an
pacman -Syud --ignore glibc
and ended in a broken package manager. pacman is linked against libcurl,
which is compiled against glibc 2.16.0 and includes versioned symbols.
Luckily I had an old
I've setup a mail server according to arch linux wiki post:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Simple_Virtual_User_Mail_System
while everything works without any error, I can send email from roundcube
but can't receive any.
please tell me what more info you need to help me figure out the problem
Am 21.08.2012 10:25, schrieb Christian Hesse:
pacman -Syud --ignore glibc
and ended in a broken package manager. pacman is linked against libcurl,
which is compiled against glibc 2.16.0 and includes versioned symbols.
Luckily I had an old curl package around to temporarily fix the problem
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org on Tue, 2012/08/21 10:43:
Am 21.08.2012 10:25, schrieb Christian Hesse:
pacman -Syud --ignore glibc
and ended in a broken package manager. pacman is linked against libcurl,
which is compiled against glibc 2.16.0 and includes versioned symbols.
2012/8/21 Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com:
I've setup a mail server according to arch linux wiki post:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Simple_Virtual_User_Mail_System
while everything works without any error, I can send email from roundcube
but can't receive any.
please tell me what
I get no bounce...
and no errors at all...
here is my mail.log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=3pmRGEK5
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
( ) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Nicolás de la
On Tuesday 21 Aug 2012 11:05:07 Christian Hesse wrote:
Oh, the commands in the wiki exclude curl now. Did not notice that.
I am fine with the situation, I can deal with these things. Hopefully others
will read the wiki. :D
For those like me that followed the news article's instructions first
Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com on Tue, 2012/08/21 11:01:
On Tuesday 21 Aug 2012 11:05:07 Christian Hesse wrote:
Oh, the commands in the wiki exclude curl now. Did not notice that.
I am fine with the situation, I can deal with these things. Hopefully
others will read the wiki. :D
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:44:04 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com a écrit :
I get no bounce...
and no errors at all...
here is my mail.log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=3pmRGEK5
Hello,
The MX set for your domain does not seem to answer :
# telnet mail.dimitrisze.com 25
Trying
On 08/21/2012 07:54 AM, Simon Perry wrote:
Hi all,
Today I've set up one of my VPS boxes with systemd after using it for a
while on various laptops.
I'm using netcfg@eth0.service to configure a static IP, however it seems
that systemd insists on starting dhcpcd, and this screws up my
well, I run smtps, so try:
openssl s_client -connect dimitrisze.com:465
as well ass IMAPS (port 993)
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
( ) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Jean-Luc Bassereau
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:45:38 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com a écrit :
well, I run smtps, so try:
openssl s_client -connect dimitrisze.com:465
as well ass IMAPS (port 993)
You need to have a MTA listening on port 25, if not, no one would be
able to send you email.
port 25 is now open and postfix listen to it
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
( ) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Jean-Luc Bassereau j...@onetoserve.netwrote:
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:45:38
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:19:38 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com a écrit :
port 25 is now open and postfix listen to it
And is it working now ?
Does postfix receive email ?
nope :(
take a look, /var/log/mail.log:
Aug 21 15:21:28 localhost postfix/smtpd[6461]: disconnect from
x.google.com[xxx..xxx.xxx]
Aug 21 15:21:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[6578]: connect from
xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx.example.net[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
Aug 21 15:21:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[6578]:
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:54:37 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com a écrit :
nope :(
take a look, /var/log/mail.log:
Aug 21 15:21:28 localhost postfix/smtpd[6461]: disconnect from
x.google.com[xxx..xxx.xxx]
Aug 21 15:21:44 localhost postfix/smtpd[6578]: connect from
How is your box configured? (initscript or systemd, KDM, etc)
In which groups is your user? You shall be in network and networkmanager
groups.
Is networkmanager running? Does it connect?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm facing the same problem, but
Since yesterday I'm receiving this error message when uprgading the
irqbalance systemd service, as this happened again some days ago when
upgrading dhcpd systemd service, I follow Tom G. advise and waited for
repos to update but this time there were more than 24hs, several mirror
changes and the
ti, 2012-08-21 kello 11:36 -0300, Martín Cigorraga kirjoitti:
(4/4) checking for file conflicts
[---] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
irqbalance: /usr/lib/systemd/system/irqbalance.service exists in filesystem
Errors occurred,
On 21 August 2012 10:36, Martín Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us wrote:
(4/4) checking for file conflicts
[---] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
irqbalance: /usr/lib/systemd/system/irqbalance.service exists in filesystem
Errors
On 20/08/12, David Hunter wrote:
| Or better yet, install systemd-sysvcompat and say goodbye to sysvinit
| completely.
Ah, very good - that worked a treat (nice to have a reboot command again
too).
Cheers.
--
Simon Perry (aka Pezz)
pgpgFn3qAgjnO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I use systemd. NM is running and I have a connection. I am a member of the
network group, but I don't have any group called networkmanager.
Its only that all the network manager tools (KDE applet, gnome applet,
nmcli) fail to communicate with networkmanager.
On 21 Aug 2012 19:23, Martin Zecher
On Aug 21, 2012 6:04 AM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote:
Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com on Tue, 2012/08/21 11:01:
On Tuesday 21 Aug 2012 11:05:07 Christian Hesse wrote:
Oh, the commands in the wiki exclude curl now. Did not notice that.
I am fine with the situation, I can
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Jean-Luc Bassereau j...@onetoserve.net wrote:
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:54:37 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com a écrit :
nope :(
take a look, /var/log/mail.log:
Aug 21 15:21:28 localhost postfix/smtpd[6461]: disconnect from
inbox is empty... :(
should I allow IMAP normal? (not SSL)
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achieve world domination.
( ) come join the dark side.
/_|_\ (we have cookies.)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Menachem Moystoviz moyst...@g.jct.ac.ilwrote:
On Tue, Aug
I've recently been testing systemd. One issue I encountered is with slapd,
the unit file ignores /etc/conf.d/slapd. Is this a bug, or am I supposed
to configure cmd line arguments (specially SLAPD_SERVICES) another way with
systemd?
Geert
--
geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:17:28 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com a écrit :
inbox is empty... :(
should I allow IMAP normal? (not SSL)
what does your logfile says about the email we sent ?
O.o nothing!
WTF?
On Aug 22, 2012 12:12 AM, Jean-Luc Bassereau j...@onetoserve.net wrote:
Le Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:17:28 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com a écrit :
inbox is empty... :(
should I allow IMAP normal? (not SSL)
what does your logfile says about the email we sent ?
Le Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:39:27 +0300
Δημήτρης Ζέρβας 01tto...@gmail.com a écrit :
O.o nothing!
WTF?
Can you try to grep my t...@test.com in your logfile ?
yes, you were right :P
ug 21 16:46:19 localhost postfix/smtpd[12628]: connect from
oiujoidjwiodjwodij.net[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
Aug 21 16:47:16 localhost postfix/trivial-rewrite[12643]: warning: do not
list domain dimitrisze.com in BOTH mydestination and virtual_mailbox_domains
Aug 21 16:47:16
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 Aug 2012 06:42, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia
archli...@ishpeck.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:29:26PM +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Just received a second bogus 'unsubscribe confirmation request'.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
with or without this poll, we are continuing with our plan.
That's exactly what you should do, if your objective is to loose
users; ignore them.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras
What alternative to systemd would you rather see? It makes things much
easier for the developers and if you don't like it you can fork arch into
your own disro. Besides relocating a changing some config files, systemd is
not going to have a noticeable impact on more than a few users. It offers
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:06:46AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Could those receiving these emails please speak out? I haven't, for one.
Not that much can be done about it..
I have received about 30 of them, all from 74.63.112.146.
Someone loves you :-) I got only 3 :-(
Ciao,
--
FA
On 22 Aug 2012 07:22, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
with or without this poll, we are continuing with our plan.
That's exactly what you should do, if your objective is to loose
users; ignore them.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com wrote:
What alternative to systemd would you rather see?
systemd is the alternative, the standard has been initscripts for
decades. Now that distributions are switching to systemd they are
starting to see boot problems that
On 22 August 2012 01:40, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com wrote:
What alternative to systemd would you rather see?
systemd is the alternative, the standard has been initscripts for
decades. Now that
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
On Aug 21, 2012 4:40 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com
wrote:
What alternative to
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
no flexibility is lost by moving to systemd, and really, much more
gained: wider userbase, wider testbase, simple units to write, simple
units to read, loosely coupled ordering, implicit dependencies, Grand
Unified
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing list
has already stated his desire to finally be rid of udev altogether. He
considers it an
abomination.
Who is this member? It seems I joined
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
And sysvinit didn't have those when it began? Come on.
I don't know, I probably wasn't born yet, and probably there weren't
even computers before. But supposing there was something before, I'm
sure the people that
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
As I said; they are tried-and-true since *decades*, all the problems
have been ironed out by slow small
On 22.08.2012 01:56, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing list
has already stated his desire to finally be rid of udev altogether. He
considers it an
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto
denisfalqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:08 PM, John K Pate j.k.p...@sms.ed.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:16:31 +0200
Felipe
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
As I said; they
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing list
has already stated his desire to finally be rid of udev
On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
As I said; they are tried-and-true since *decades*, all
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
As I said; they
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com
wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
So if it works for you, it will surely work for *everybody* else. I
have seen this argument so many times that I'm starting to worry about
the rationality of Arch Linux users and developers.
Yes, it's good to
On 22/08/12 03:03, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
So if it works for you, it will surely work for *everybody* else. I
have seen this argument so many times that I'm starting to worry about
the rationality of
On 22.08.2012 02:48, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com
wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why
On 22/08/12 at 04:23am, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 22.08.2012 02:48, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com
wrote:
On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy theger...@gmail.com
On 08/22/12 at 02:06am, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com
wrote:
And sysvinit didn't have those when it began? Come on.
I don't know, I probably wasn't born yet, and probably there weren't
even computers before. But supposing
2012/8/22 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
no flexibility is lost by moving to systemd, and really, much more
gained: wider userbase, wider testbase, simple units to write, simple
units to read, loosely
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
Even with udev moving into systemd, an individual on the systemd mailing list
has already stated his desire to finally be rid of udev
61 matches
Mail list logo
