[arch-general] MS-Exchange email

2012-09-25 Thread Guillermo Leira
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Figue ffi...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/09/12 08:35, Guillermo Leira wrote: And I'm using outlook in a XP VM inside VMware Workstation. We have Exchange at the office, and I haven't found another way of connecting to it. Thunderbird with a few addons

Re: [arch-general] MS-Exchange email

2012-09-25 Thread Guillermo Leira
-Mensaje original- De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de Guillermo Leira Enviado el: martes, 25 de septiembre de 2012 8:49 Para: 'General Discussion about Arch Linux' Asunto: [arch-general] MS-Exchange email On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:03 AM,

Re: [arch-general] MS-Exchange email

2012-09-25 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Guillermo Leira gle...@gleira.com wrote: -Mensaje original- De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de Guillermo Leira Enviado el: martes, 25 de septiembre de 2012 8:49 Para: 'General Discussion about Arch Linux' Asunto:

Re: [arch-general] Wanted: advice dual-booting Arch and Windows 7 on new laptop

2012-09-25 Thread Georgios Nikolopoulos
Personally if you have a large enough separate drive and enough patience. I would do a bit level copy which if successful is guaranteed to put the disk back exactly. #/bin/dd bs=32k if=/dev/sd? | /usr/bin/gzip /media/usb0/hpBACKUP.dd.gz Restore with #/bin/cat /media/usb0/hpBACKUP.dd.gz |

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Øyvind Heggstad
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:52:54 +0900 Zhengyu Xu xzy3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Allan, Thank you very much for the link as well as the removal of systemd i686 from testing repo. Sorry for generating some unnecessary noise in this list. Best regards, Z. Don't worry, you are not at fault in

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:35:47 +0200 schrieb Øyvind Heggstad mrelen...@har-ikkje.net: Don't worry, you are not at fault in any way here, the systemd hateboy(z)/fudspreader(s) are. Wrong. The systemd fanboys who want to force this crap on everybody else are. The fudspreaders, as you call them,

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:35:47 +0200 schrieb Øyvind Heggstad mrelen...@har-ikkje.net: Don't worry, you are not at fault in any way here, the systemd hateboy(z)/fudspreader(s) are. Wrong. The systemd fanboys who want to

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:28:40 -0300 schrieb Denis A. Altoé Falqueto denisfalqu...@gmail.com: How long will we have to endure such nonsense? Heiko, you hijacked a thread just to tell your opinion, which everyone already know from your previous posts. And, please, don't reply to me. I don't care.

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Uros Vampl
Heiko Baums lists at baums-on-web.de writes: Hey, I don't like him and his opinion. So admins, ban him. Is it this what you want to say? Using sarcasm like you did in your first message of this thread, and using words like Poetterix and fanboys is not stating an option. It's trolling. Also,

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:28:40 -0300 schrieb Denis A. Altoé Falqueto denisfalqu...@gmail.com: How long will we have to endure such nonsense? Heiko, you hijacked a thread just to tell your opinion, which everyone already

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Simon Perry
On 25/09/12, Felipe Contreras wrote: | There's a difference between using a strong tone, and being a troll. | | Using that definition, Linus Torvalds is a troll on the LKML. I disagree. The Linux kernel has never had a bug that has resulted in an un-bootable system. So as Heiko says, that is

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread G. Schlisio
Am 25.09.2012 16:59, schrieb Simon Perry: On 25/09/12, Felipe Contreras wrote: | There's a difference between using a strong tone, and being a troll. | | Using that definition, Linus Torvalds is a troll on the LKML. I disagree. The Linux kernel has never had a bug that has resulted in an

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 17:26 +0200, G. Schlisio wrote: please stop it altogether. this leads nowhere. Heiko, 13 mails, including the replies to the mails of the others. Others, 46 mails. Don't blame a single person. Useful input regarding to the subject, perhaps around 2 mails? If a troll would

Re: [arch-general] Unsubscribe (was: testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot)

2012-09-25 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: This might be helpful http://lmgtfy.com/?q=arch+wiki+email+filter I'm really tired of this nonsense, so I'll unsubscribe. No need to answer me, because I'll not see it. Not that it will be any loss for Arch per se,

Re: [arch-general] [seamonkey] Update is strongly required

2012-09-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:35:50 +0200 Christopher Reimer c.reimer1...@gmail.com wrote: I've already written this to the bugtracker. There I was told to post it here: seamonkey is flagged out of date for about 4 weeks now. There are several security vulnerabilites in 2.11 --

Re: [arch-general] [seamonkey] Update is strongly required

2012-09-25 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Christopher Reimer c.reimer1...@gmail.com wrote: I've already written this to the bugtracker. There I was told to post it here: seamonkey is flagged out of date for about 4 weeks now. There are several security vulnerabilites in 2.11 --

[arch-general] ABS and pacman

2012-09-25 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hello, I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of the packages updated in my pacman -Syu this morning substituted a version I had tweaked the ABS way. Nothing serious, as I say, and wholly my fault, but yet I was wondering: Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it

Re: [arch-general] ABS and pacman

2012-09-25 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com wrote: Hello, I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of the packages updated in my pacman -Syu this morning substituted a version I had tweaked the ABS way. Nothing serious, as I say, and wholly my fault, but yet I

Re: [arch-general] ABS and pacman

2012-09-25 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com wrote: Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is going to substitute a package that has been ABS'd? Why not put your tweaked packages

Re: [arch-general] [seamonkey] Update is strongly required

2012-09-25 Thread Christopher Reimer
Ohh, I missed that. Sorry for the noise. Am 25.09.2012 20:01 schrieb Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Christopher Reimer c.reimer1...@gmail.com wrote: I've already written this to the bugtracker. There I was told to post it here: seamonkey is

Re: [arch-general] ABS and pacman

2012-09-25 Thread Zeke Sulastin
Many times these tweaks are temporary and, indeed, newer versions make them unnecessary. It can definitely be done as you suggest, but I think it'd be in the spirit of the help provided by, e.g., .pacsave and .pacnew files, to have pacman issue a warning. -- Pacman doesn't really have a way

Re: [arch-general] ABS and pacman

2012-09-25 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com wrote: On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com wrote: Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is going to

Re: [arch-general] ABS and pacman

2012-09-25 Thread Daniel Wallace
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:34:37PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote: On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com wrote: Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is going to

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-25 Thread Simon Perry
On 25/09/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote: | If a troll would write something stupid about any other software, from | any other coder, this never ever would cause such a useless and long | thread. It needs fans to continue nothing. It takes two to tango. Perhaps you need a reminder of the fair and

Re: [arch-general] ABS and pacman

2012-09-25 Thread gt
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:09:59PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote: Hello, I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of the packages updated in my pacman -Syu this morning substituted a version I had tweaked the ABS way. Nothing serious, as I say, and wholly my fault, but yet I was