Hi,
I see that xdm and awesome wm dont go well together. It used to work well
before. I see after recent package update. awesome wm crashes often.
After killing xdm, it is back normal again. Has anyone else experienced
this ? If xdm is buggy, then can someone suggest a good login manager for
Hi,
Apparently I cannot post to arch-dev-public so I'm posting this here.
This is a proposal for making separate packages for static libraries
(with a patch for Boost C++ libraries as an example). Please see
below...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Liew
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 16:40 +, ashwin wrote:
What i am looking for is just the login manager and its dependecies
and not the entire DE.
$ pacman -Qi lightdm | grep Depe
Depends On : libxklavier polkit systemd
Installed here, it might have it's weak points too, but since I didn't
drop
[2013-09-28 15:26:56 +0100] Delcypher:
For popular packages that have can build static libraries and shared
libraries, build both but put the static libraries into their own
*-staticlibs package and the *-libs packages should contain only
shared libraries. For example for boost you would have
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 6:40 PM, ashwin ashwin@gmail.com wrote:
What i am looking for is just the
login manager and its dependecies and not the entire DE. I assume kdm
does the same thing.
If you can cope with GTK+3 being pulled, try LightDM
Am 28.09.2013 16:26, schrieb Delcypher:
I really don't think that completely removing static libraries from
the repositories is the correct approach because it I believe the
choice of whether or not to have static libraries on your system
should be down to the user and not the distro
This has
On 28.09.13 at 20:12, Szymon Szydełko wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 6:40 PM, ashwin ashwin@gmail.com wrote:
What i am looking for is just the
login manager and its dependecies and not the entire DE. I assume kdm
does the same thing.
If you can cope with GTK+3 being pulled,
On 28/09/13 19:27, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-09-28 15:26:56 +0100] Delcypher:
I am strongly against this proposal.
For many reasons, including those in the page Allan pointed to, dynamic
libraries should be the default on Arch systems, and they should be the
only supported type of library.
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 21:05 +0200, Jakub Klinkovský wrote:
On 28.09.13 at 20:12, Szymon Szydełko wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 6:40 PM, ashwin ashwin@gmail.com wrote:
What i am looking for is just the
login manager and its dependecies and not the entire DE. I assume kdm
does
[2013-09-28 22:25:55 +0100] Dan Liew:
On 28/09/13 19:27, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-09-28 15:26:56 +0100] Delcypher:
I am strongly against this proposal.
For many reasons, including those in the page Allan pointed to, dynamic
libraries should be the default on Arch systems, and they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/09/13 19:32, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 28.09.2013 16:26, schrieb Delcypher:
I really don't think that completely removing static libraries from
the repositories is the correct approach because it I believe the
choice of whether or not to have
On 2013-09-28 23:50, Dan Liew wrote:
[1] 11.4.2. LLVM is a Collection of Libraries
http://www.aosabook.org/en/llvm.html
My last reply was flippant. Apologies for that.
However, I don't see any mention of why static libraries should
supposedly be better for LLVM at the above URL. Can you
On 2013-09-28 23:50, Dan Liew wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/09/13 19:32, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 28.09.2013 16:26, schrieb Delcypher:
I really don't think that completely removing static libraries from
the repositories is the correct approach because it I
I recently upgraded to systemd-207 and I'm having some problems using
netctl to bring up a bridged interface during the system boot. The problem
is that systemd will try and bring the bridged interface up before bringing
up the actual network interface that is included in the bridge and, as a
14 matches
Mail list logo
