On 13 March 2014 11:09, Don Raikes don.rai...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
Are there instructions for creating an archlinux usb key with persistence
somewhere?
I want to use my archlinux usb key as a diagnostic tool, and sometimes it is
helpful to save files to it for later review.
Any
Salutations,
While I don't know of any specific instructions on the Arch wiki, you can
install Arch Linux onto a usb stick like a regular {H,S}DD. In my case, I
made three partitions. The first was an NTFS partition for using the usb
stick as a data transferring device; the second was a FAT32
On Wednesday 12 Mar 2014 15:21:23 Ary Kleinerman wrote:
I'm thinking to use Arch for an Asterisk server. Nowadays I'm using
Ubuntu 12.04LTS, but I can see all distribution changing to the new
init system (systemd). I wanna change all my scripts to be compatible
with systemd. Furthermore, my
On 03/13/14 at 03:59am, Mark Lee wrote:
While I don't know of any specific instructions on the Arch wiki, you can
install Arch Linux onto a usb stick like a regular {H,S}DD. In my case, I
made three partitions. The first was an NTFS partition for using the usb
stick as a data transferring
Salutations,
I wanted to float the idea of mounting /tmp on zram. We could still use the
50% ratio (or something less) but reduce the risk of running out of ram
while using tmpfs.
Regards,
Mark
On 2014年03月13日 19:26, Mark Lee wrote:
Salutations,
I wanted to float the idea of mounting /tmp on zram. We could still use the
50% ratio (or something less) but reduce the risk of running out of ram
while using tmpfs.
Regards,
Mark
I find zram not very stable. Several system freeze happened to
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:28 PM, GSC xgd...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014年03月13日 19:26, Mark Lee wrote:
Salutations,
I wanted to float the idea of mounting /tmp on zram. We could still use
the
50% ratio (or something less) but reduce the risk of running out of ram
while using tmpfs.
Regards,
On 13/03/14, GSC wrote:
| I find zram not very stable. Several system freeze happened to me and I
| stopped using it,
Same, turned it on for two low-ram boxes I had, caused more problems
than it solved.
--
Simon Perry (aka Pezz)
On 2014年03月13日 19:35, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Are you talking about zramswap or zswap? The former did have some issues.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=169585
I 'm talking about zramswap. I currently use linux-lts so zswap not yet
available. Is zswap stable?
On 13-03-2014 11:40, GSC wrote:
On 2014年03月13日 19:35, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Are you talking about zramswap or zswap? The former did have some issues.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=169585
I 'm talking about zramswap. I currently use linux-lts so zswap not yet
available. Is zswap
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Don Raikes don.rai...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
Are there instructions for creating an archlinux usb key with
persistence somewhere?
I want to use my archlinux usb key as a diagnostic tool, and
sometimes it is helpful to save files to it for
On 13/03/14, Mauro Santos wrote:
| I have had it enabled for a while and I haven't yet seen any nasty crash
| due to it. Hibernation also works fine and seems to go faster than
| without zswap.
How much RAM do you have?
zram is probably solving a problem you don't have.
Enable it on a VPS that
Salutations,
I've had excessive swapping (high cpu usage with kswapd) and the
termination of running programs (like Skype) due to zram swapping. I used
zramswap from the AUR to start the service, but it only calls on the kernel
to produce the block devices. A compressed zram device (like maybe
Salutations,
Do you know how stable F2FS is (the Phoronix benchmarks don't tell us
anything about data permanence)?
Regards,
Mark
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Øyvind Heggstad mrelen...@har-ikkje.netwrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Don Raikes don.rai...@oracle.com wrote:
Salutations,
If you kind of just follow my message you'll understand how. It really goes
exactly like I said. I'll work on writing a script for generating one,
possibly have a rough draft sometime tomorrow.
Regards,
Mark
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Manolo Martínez
On 13-03-2014 12:06, Simon Perry wrote:
On 13/03/14, Mauro Santos wrote:
| I have had it enabled for a while and I haven't yet seen any nasty crash
| due to it. Hibernation also works fine and seems to go faster than
| without zswap.
How much RAM do you have?
zram is probably solving a
On 13-03-2014 12:04, Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
Any info would be appreciated.
BTW: I am planning on using a 64gb usb key for this endeavor.
Just create a extra partition on the usb stick and format it as f2fs or
whatever. There you go, persistent storage.
I would say go with btrfs in that
Salutations,
Remember that fat32 has a 4GB file size limitation (it doesn't effect Mauro
Santos, cause his partition is 4GB). In addition I suggest using fat32 for
/boot since it can also work on UEFI systems (minimum partition size is
100mb). I also use luks+btrfs (I use dmcrypt).
Regards,
Mark
On Mar 13, 2014 2:56 PM, Mark Lee m...@markelee.com wrote:
Salutations,
Do you know how stable F2FS is (the Phoronix benchmarks don't tell us
anything about data permanence)?
Regards,
Mark
A quick search for 'samsung phone data loss' comes up only with undeleting
methods and a virus.
On 13-03-2014 14:01, Mark Lee wrote:
Salutations,
Remember that fat32 has a 4GB file size limitation (it doesn't effect Mauro
Santos, cause his partition is 4GB). In addition I suggest using fat32 for
/boot since it can also work on UEFI systems (minimum partition size is
100mb). I also use
I agree! It sounds like just what I need.
-Original Message-
From: Manolo Martínez [mailto:man...@austrohungaro.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:39 AM
To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
Subject: Re: [arch-general] creating an archlinux usb key with persistence
On 03/13/14 at
Sounds likea good setup.
What tool are you using for partitioning? I don't remember luks/btrfs as an
option in fdisk, admittedly I am coming from a debian perspective just
switching to arch to try it out.
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Santos [mailto:registo.maill...@gmail.com]
Sent:
My setup right now is this:
32GB usb3 drive
|-sda1 (4G) - fat32
|-sda1 (256M) - ext4 /boot
|-sda2 (rest of drive) - luks - btrfs - subvolumes for root and home
Sounds likea good setup.
What tool are you using for partitioning? I don't remember luks/btrfs as
an option in fdisk, admittedly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/13/2014 01:20 PM, Temlin Olivér wrote:
My setup right now is this:
32GB usb3 drive
|-sda1 (4G) - fat32
|-sda1 (256M) - ext4 /boot
|-sda2 (rest of drive) - luks - btrfs - subvolumes for root and home
Sounds likea good setup.
What
I noticed recently that qtcreator is updated to such non-stable
versions, and there is no critical bug related that require such updates
on the bug tracker. What is the reason this package is updated to such
versions so early? I remember there used to be similar early updates
with earlier
25 matches
Mail list logo
