On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:35:38PM -0400, Mark Lee wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 03/19/2014 10:34 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:42:46PM -0400, Mark Lee wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> On 03/1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/19/2014 10:34 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:42:46PM -0400, Mark Lee wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 03/19/2014 09:40 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:06:18
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:42:46PM -0400, Mark Lee wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 03/19/2014 09:40 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:06:18AM +, Mauro Santos wrote:
> >> On 20-03-2014 00:41, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> >>> Hi, folks. I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/19/2014 09:40 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:06:18AM +, Mauro Santos wrote:
>> On 20-03-2014 00:41, Sean Greenslade wrote:
>>> Hi, folks. I've been noodling over this rather odd issue I've been
>>> having, and I tho
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:06:18AM +, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 20-03-2014 00:41, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I've been noodling over this rather odd issue I've been
> > having, and I thought I'd get a second opinion on things.
> >
> > So I'm stumped, here. Anyone have any clue as to
On 20-03-2014 00:41, Sean Greenslade wrote:
> Hi, folks. I've been noodling over this rather odd issue I've been
> having, and I thought I'd get a second opinion on things. I've got a
> server with four hard disks, set up in two (separate) BTRFS RAID1
> mounts. I just recovered from a bout of SATA
Hi, folks. I've been noodling over this rather odd issue I've been
having, and I thought I'd get a second opinion on things. I've got a
server with four hard disks, set up in two (separate) BTRFS RAID1
mounts. I just recovered from a bout of SATA signalling issues (which
BTRFS did a marvellous job
On 2014-03-18 13:01, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote:
--
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:30:34 +0100
From: Ralf Mardorf
Subject: Re: [arch-general] user management error
You can't login as user, you log in as root. There seems to be a
serious
languag
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 20:17:53 +
> From: let...@openmailbox.org
> To: arch-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: [arch-general] graphical display management
>
> Readers,
>
> According to the command 'pacman -Q -e | less', gdm is shown as
> installed. The c
On 03/19/2014 09:17 PM, message wrote:
> Readers,
>
> According to the command 'pacman -Q -e | less', gdm is shown as
> installed. The command 'startx' doesn't start gdm, but instead the same
> graphical manager that starts following the test procedure.
>
> How to start gdm?
>
gdm is a daemon,
Readers,
According to the command 'pacman -Q -e | less', gdm is shown as
installed. The command 'startx' doesn't start gdm, but instead the same
graphical manager that starts following the test procedure.
How to start gdm?
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 19:28 +, message wrote:
> > If the directory isn't being mounted, can you please post the contents
> > of /etc/fstab ?
> >
>
> There are two entries:
>
> /dev/sda... uuid=... / ext4
> /dev/sad... uuid=... /home ext4
UUID=
LABEL=
/dev/
You sh
On 2014-03-18 13:01, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote:
--
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:53:08 +0100
From: Ralf Mardorf
Subject: Re: [arch-general] user management error
I don't understand you. "su" isn't recognised, but you su to user "a"?
Not at
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 20:55 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 19:28 +, message wrote:
> > > If the directory isn't being mounted, can you please post the contents
> > > of /etc/fstab ?
> > >
> >
> > There are two entries:
> >
> > /dev/sda... uuid=... / ext4
> > /dev/sad...
On 2014-03-17 22:59, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote:
--
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:50:19 -0400
From: Gerald Stuhrberg
Subject: Re: [arch-general] user management error
If the directory isn't being mounted, can you please post the contents
of
/e
> There's not really much magic going on. Are you aware of:
>
> /etc/systemd/system
>
> This contains symlinks that do already pretty much what you describe, and this
> is systemd's native configuration.
>
Paul,
Don't forget
/run/systemd/system: Runtime units and /usr/lib/systemd/system: Units
of i
On 19-03-2014 02:18, Maykel Franco wrote:
Thanks!!
I executed:
localectl set-x11-keymap es,us pc104 deadtilde,dvorak
grp:alt_shift_toggle
And locatectl:
maykel@arch-maykel ~/ $ localectl
System Locale: LANG=es_ES.utf8
VC Keymap: es
X11 Layout: es,us
X11 Model: pc104
On Wednesday 19 Mar 2014 12:52:55 Gesh wrote:
> Dear all,
> I've been rereading the old arguments on the rc.conf split.
> Disregarding everything discussed there, one interesting
> point came up during that discussion.[1]
> Is it possible to have some configuration file, e.g.
> /etc/systems/service
Dear all,
I've been rereading the old arguments on the rc.conf split.
Disregarding everything discussed there, one interesting
point came up during that discussion.[1]
Is it possible to have some configuration file, e.g.
/etc/systems/services.conf that would list all the units
one wants to be enabl
19 matches
Mail list logo
