I'm having a problem with the liteide vs gocode-git packages. liteide,
which is an official Pacman package, has recently started to include
the /usr/bin/gocode binary, which I have been using via the AUR
package gocode-git (there is also another AUR package called
gocode-bin but no pacman
2014-03-24 18:58 GMT+01:00 Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 24.03.2014 17:18, schrieb Karol Blazewicz:
jre7 is in the AUR so pacman won't update it, but jre7-openjdk is in
the repos and provides the same
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:03:59 -0400
From: jdarn...@buddydog.org
To: arch-general@archlinux.org
Subject: [arch-general] Package conflicts
I'm having a problem with the liteide vs gocode-git packages. liteide,
which is an official Pacman package, has
Am 25.03.2014 16:33, schrieb Doug Newgard:
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:03:59 -0400
From: jdarn...@buddydog.org
To: arch-general@archlinux.org
Subject: [arch-general] Package conflicts
I'm having a problem with the liteide vs gocode-git packages. liteide,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:03:59 -0400
From: jdarn...@buddydog.org
To: arch-general@archlinux.org
Subject: [arch-general] Package conflicts
I'm having a problem with the
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:59:29 +0100
From: ad...@progandy.de
To: arch-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Package conflicts
Am 25.03.2014 16:33, schrieb Doug Newgard:
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014
Dear list,
I decided to get rid of my mate DE and go i3. Before I am testing my
settings on tty2 (Ctrl+Alt+F2) with a modify .xinitrc (exec i3).
I have a weird behavior as regarding my web browser, could it be
chromium or firefox.
On my i3 config. I have this line:
assign [instance=^chromium$]
Verify there is no running instance of Chromium in any other session, as it
spawns children withing its original session. I have seen this happen with
X2go as well.
Jason Plum
WarheadsSE
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear list,
I decided to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/25/2014 01:23 PM, Jason Plum wrote:
Verify there is no running instance of Chromium in any other session, as it
spawns children withing its original session. I have seen this happen with
X2go as well.
Jason Plum
WarheadsSE
On Tue,
On 25.03.14 at 13:26, Mark Lee wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/25/2014 01:23 PM, Jason Plum wrote:
Verify there is no running instance of Chromium in any other session, as it
spawns children withing its original session. I have seen this happen with
X2go as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/25/2014 01:32 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote:
On 25.03.14 at 13:26, Mark Lee wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/25/2014 01:23 PM, Jason Plum wrote:
Verify there is no running instance of Chromium in any other
On 25.03.14 at 18:18, arnaud gaboury wrote:
Dear list,
I decided to get rid of my mate DE and go i3. Before I am testing my
settings on tty2 (Ctrl+Alt+F2) with a modify .xinitrc (exec i3).
I have a weird behavior as regarding my web browser, could it be
chromium or firefox.
On my i3
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jakub Klinkovský j@gmx.com wrote:
On 25.03.14 at 18:18, arnaud gaboury wrote:
Dear list,
I decided to get rid of my mate DE and go i3. Before I am testing my
settings on tty2 (Ctrl+Alt+F2) with a modify .xinitrc (exec i3).
I have a weird behavior as
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:00:57 +0100
Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com
wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:03:59 -0400
From: jdarn...@buddydog.org
To:
i3 workspace is *not* tty! See
http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspaces
No ?? really? Are you joking ?
According to the Arch Wiki :
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/I3#Launching_programs_on_specific_workspaces;
that seems to be the correct behavior.
You are assigning chromium to be launched on tty1.
No, I am assigning chromium to be launched on WORKSPACE 1 !!
I apologize I just caught
On 25.03.14 at 18:56, arnaud gaboury wrote:
i3 workspace is *not* tty! See
http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspaces
No ?? really? Are you joking ?
I'm certain. i3 workspaces are an implementation of virtual desktop [1], as
Wikipedia calls it. I'm quite sure that MATE has
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jakub Klinkovský j@gmx.com wrote:
On 25.03.14 at 18:56, arnaud gaboury wrote:
i3 workspace is *not* tty! See
http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspaces
No ?? really? Are you joking ?
I'm certain. i3 workspaces are an implementation of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/25/2014 02:17 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jakub Klinkovský j@gmx.com wrote:
On 25.03.14 at 18:56, arnaud gaboury wrote:
i3 workspace is *not* tty! See
On 25.03.14 at 19:02, arnaud gaboury wrote:
According to the Arch Wiki :
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/I3#Launching_programs_on_specific_workspaces;
that seems to be the correct behavior.
You are assigning chromium to be launched on tty1.
No, I am assigning chromium to be
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Mark Lee m...@markelee.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I just tested out i3 myself, and if you launch it with startx (from
xorg-xinit), I don't have any issues launching chromium in the same TTY.
See
The 'assign' directive will not start Chromium, you would need to combine it
with 'exec'. Or have I misunderstood again?
That is OK now with adding the exec line
Furthermore, my keyboard is US, not the one I use.
Part of my /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section InputDevice
Identifier
On 25.03.14 at 19:17, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jakub Klinkovský j@gmx.com wrote:
On 25.03.14 at 18:56, arnaud gaboury wrote:
i3 workspace is *not* tty! See
http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspaces
No ?? really? Are you joking ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/25/2014 02:29 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Mark Lee m...@markelee.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I just tested out i3 myself, and if you launch it with startx (from
xorg-xinit), I don't have
See the other post, and please keep try to keep the problem solving linear (as
in linear graph), don't switch branches if possible.
Mutt and weechat are on my TODO list
On 25-03-14 16:09, Maykel Franco wrote:
2014-03-24 18:58 GMT+01:00 Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 24.03.2014 17:18, schrieb Karol Blazewicz:
jre7 is in the AUR so pacman won't update it, but
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:36:01PM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
See the other post, and please keep try to keep the problem solving linear
(as
in linear graph), don't switch branches if possible.
Mutt and weechat are on my TODO list
This is hilarious...
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Lieven Moors lievenmo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:36:01PM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
See the other post, and please keep try to keep the problem solving linear
(as
in linear graph), don't switch branches if possible.
Mutt and
As for firefox, these two lines starts firefox, BUT in workspace 2, as
indicated in the i3 bar.
exec firefox-aurora
assign [instance=^firefox-aurora$] 1
exec --no-startup-id i3-msg 'workspace 1; exec firefox-aurora' did the trick
I'm just starting to dip my toes in the mono waters. Slightly
prompted by my current situation at work. In particular I'm
interested in F#, but I'm finding the whole situation around
mono/monodevelop + F# a bit confusing.
1. There are indications online that mono ships with F# [^1][^2]. But
On 25.03.14 at 23:35, arnaud gaboury wrote:
As for firefox, these two lines starts firefox, BUT in workspace 2, as
indicated in the i3 bar.
exec firefox-aurora
assign [instance=^firefox-aurora$] 1
exec --no-startup-id i3-msg 'workspace 1; exec firefox-aurora' did the trick
Hi,
now that GNOME 3.12 has been released and probably will hit the repos in
the next couple of days/weeks, I'm wondering what the current status of
Software is [1]? This is an application similar to an app store in the
mobile world.
I couldn't find it in the repos, and I wouldn't expect it to
On 03/26/2014 01:26 AM, Karol Babioch wrote:
Hi,
now that GNOME 3.12 has been released and probably will hit the repos in
the next couple of days/weeks, I'm wondering what the current status of
Software is [1]? This is an application similar to an app store in the
mobile world.
I
33 matches
Mail list logo
