Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 06:40 +0200, Stefan Tatschner wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 04:57 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 12:29 +0200, Stefan Tatschner wrote: today I have run pacman -Syu on my arch server. Systemd was updated from 213 to 214 and now I don't get any

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 08:58 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ uname -rm 3.8.13-rt14-1-rt x86_64 [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Si linux-lts | grep Version Version: 3.10.44-1 I still don't know what messages you don't get, however, I get messages

[arch-general] Module needed by a unit

2014-06-25 Thread Yamakaky
Hi I'm trying to improve the unit for a fan manager daemon for MacBook Pro. As it is, it's a dependency of multi-user.target. I would like it to start earlier in the boot process, so that he is available with rescue.target, and to refresh the computer during bootup. I tried with

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Martti Kühne
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Tatschner rumpels...@sevenbyte.org wrote: I dont't get *ANY* message after booting the machine. After every service has been started (my last one is always fail2ban) I do not get any more messages. This includes e.g. postfix, amavis, ssh, dovecot, cron,

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Martti Kühne: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Tatschner The lack of journal messages also mean that fail2ban does not work; that's really bad. I will try updating once again later this day and I'll let you know. I'm not sure how

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Martti Kühne
This is not correct. :-) Fail2ban needs to somehow get those messages from journald. Did you try disabling it for a boot? When you update today, maybe trying to log the clogging of your services (eg. strace) would be a good idea. cheers! mar77i

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Davor Rotim
Yes, same issue here. All services start normally just no logging to the journal. For example, journalctl -u systemd-networkd will only show logs until the systemd 214 upgrade after that as if it never existed (but strangely everything works normally). This is on 3.15.1-1-ARCH i686.

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Davor Rotim
I have reported this to the bug tracker: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40970

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Davor Rotim: Yes, same issue here. All services start normally just no logging to the journal. For example, journalctl -u systemd-networkd will only show logs until the systemd 214 upgrade after that as if it never existed (but strangely

[arch-general] New mailing list for AUR requests (delete, merge, orphan, ..)

2014-06-25 Thread Florian Pritz
Hi, As requested by Lukas, I've created a new mailing list for AUR related requests such as deletion, merge or orphan requests. The AUR will soon feature a web interface to create such requests and for history and discussion purposes mails will be sent to this new list. Please start using it

[arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: the latest stable

Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Daniel Micay
On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org

Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? On Wed,

Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the

[arch-general] [answered (solved)] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1,