On Aug 27, 2014 4:57 PM, "toerb" wrote:
>
>
>
> >Are you saying that is wrong and the only thing being taken up is just
> >a tiny bundle of data?
>
> Exactly.
It does consume a PID, which can, depending on the environment, be a very
limited resource.
Kevin Ott wrote:
> It doesn't make sense that zombie processes would take up anything more than
> a few bits (possibly a bit more) somewhere if you understand what exactly
> they are. Zombie processes are just processes that have finished doing
> everything they need to do. The only reason t
On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 02:48:55 PM Andy Pieters wrote:
>
> On 27 August 2014 02:03, Jan Alexander Steffens
> wrote:
> >
> > No, since a zombie process is dead and cannot execute any code.
>
> >To expand more on that: zombie process in not really a process
> >anymore. In fact, it's not an
>Are you saying that is wrong and the only thing being taken up is just
>a tiny bundle of data?
Exactly.
On 27 August 2014 02:03, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote:
>
> No, since a zombie process is dead and cannot execute any code.
>To expand more on that: zombie process in not really a process
>anymore. In fact, it's not anything more than a little bundle of data
>(basically just an integer containin
On 27 August 2014 02:03, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote:
>
> No, since a zombie process is dead and cannot execute any code.
To expand more on that: zombie process in not really a process
anymore. In fact, it's not anything more than a little bundle of data
(basically just an integer containing the
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 15:24 +0530, phanisvar das wrote:
> On 08/27/2014 02:53 PM, Temlin Olivér wrote:
> > It's a policy to keep users from learning bad things. You should never
> > suggest --force or a package from AUR unless you attach a big fat warning,
> > otherwise it would mean to encourage t
On 08/27/2014 02:53 PM, Temlin Olivér wrote:
It's a policy to keep users from learning bad things. You should never
suggest --force or a package from AUR unless you attach a big fat warning,
otherwise it would mean to encourage them to do it in other (seemingly
indifferent) cases, eg. updating fi
$ sudo pacman --force -S pacparser cuda
>>>
>>> That was a horrible thing to do, and an even worse thing to recommend
here.
>
> What exactly is horrible? The OP needs the software and the conflict is
> just a man page. IMO it's a valid workaround, exactly what the --force
> option should be us
9 matches
Mail list logo
