>
> Just watched : there is already this bug report :
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41863
But that task is not only about the filesystem location of the Pacman DB.
It could be useful to open a separate bugreport just for that one issue.
On 10 September 2014 21:37, Yamakaky wrote:
> Anyway,
Anyway, I think you should open a feature request at the
bugtracker.
Just watched : there is already this bug report :
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41863
I htink you are right about the local DB (/var/lib/pacman/local). However,
/var/lib/pacman/sync should probably stay in /var (I don't need a rw root FS to
resync package DB).
Yes, of course. I was talking about the local/ database.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:05:03PM +0200, Yamakaky wrote:
> Le 10/09/2014 20:50, Joel Teichroeb a écrit :
> >Generally, things that are written to are not stored in /usr.
> >
> >This page might help
> >
> >https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/arch_filesystem_hierarchy
> >
>
> That's what I thought
Le 10/09/2014 20:50, Joel Teichroeb a écrit :
Generally, things that are written to are not stored in /usr.
This page might help
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/arch_filesystem_hierarchy
That's what I thought at first, but it's different. pacman db doesn't
contain runtime stuff, it's a
Generally, things that are written to are not stored in /usr.
This page might help
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/arch_filesystem_hierarchy
Hi !
Why is the pacman local database location defaulted to /var/lib/pacman ?
It should go in /usr as it reflects the installed packages and it is
only updated when a package is updated. If it where in /usr, it would be
easier to share the /usr partition between hosts.
What do you think ?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Guillaume ALAUX
wrote:
> On 9 September 2014 12:25, lolilolicon wrote:
>> To be sure, I do appreciate your effort, Guillaume. No one likes to deal
>> with this java crap. I don't have strong objections against your general
>> approach, only this particular packagi
On 9 September 2014 12:25, lolilolicon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Guillaume ALAUX
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Guillaume here (packager of that "piece of crap" java-common).
>
> Yes it is pretty crappy.
>
>>> symlinks created by the jre* packages at install time, without any
>>> pac
9 matches
Mail list logo