Okay, thanks. Just wanted to be sure, and didn't seem to find the question
answered on the arch website.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
>
> > So, if a package (even a kernel) is shown flagged as "out-of-date"
> > on
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
> So, if a package (even a kernel) is shown flagged as "out-of-date"
> on the Arch website, and there is no later package (excluding testing,
> etc.), is it okay to install or update that package, if there are no other
> indications not to?
>
So, if a package (even a kernel) is shown flagged as "out-of-date"
on the Arch website, and there is no later package (excluding testing,
etc.), is it okay to install or update that package, if there are no other
indications not to?
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On Wed
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Linux kernel 4.0.2-1 is flagged out-of date, just hours after release. But
> pacmatic keeps offering it as an update (along with other packages), with
> no warning message.
>
> I am using Linux kernel 4.0.1-1-ARCH (X-64).
>
> Shoul
On 14/05/15 01:07, Yang Su wrote:
Hello,
Trying to build qt5 with debug symbols, but failed. Using the qt5 from
abs, per instructions in the wiki (
[snip]
Any suggestions?
You can save yourself all the hassle by getting pre-built arch packages
from this repo:
http://qutebrowser.org/
Hello,
Trying to build qt5 with debug symbols, but failed. Using the qt5 from
abs, per instructions in the wiki (
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Debug_-_Getting_Traces), I added in
the PKGBUILD
options=(debug !strip)
and added
-developer-build -no-warnings-are-errors
to the configure a
Hi.
Linux kernel 4.0.2-1 is flagged out-of date, just hours after release. But
pacmatic keeps offering it as an update (along with other packages), with
no warning message.
I am using Linux kernel 4.0.1-1-ARCH (X-64).
Should I go ahead and update, or wait for Linux kernel 4.0.3-1?
On 13/05/15 03:15 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 13/05/15 02:52 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 May 2015 02:27:14 -0400
>> Daniel Micay wrote:
>>
>>> The base and base-devel groups are installed in the containers used for
>>> building, so it's quite sane to assume they're present as build deps
On 13/05/15 02:52 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015 02:27:14 -0400
> Daniel Micay wrote:
>
>> The base and base-devel groups are installed in the containers used for
>> building, so it's quite sane to assume they're present as build deps.
>
> That hasn't been true for a while now. Bu
9 matches
Mail list logo
