On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:31:27AM -0600, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 17:56:30 +0100
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> > I've just updated a sligtly neglected machine I have (not upgraded
> > since mid-September). Thanks to the [ARA][1] I managed to upgrade it
> > in weekly steps. It all
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015, Doug Newgard wrote:
Putting it in the AUR would just get it deleted. Rule 1 of the AUR is that it
can't duplicate packages in the official repos.
Okay. I figured that sometimes v2 and v1 become separate packages, so it might
not count as a "duplicate", but I'll sit back a
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:38:04 -0500 (EST)
Scott Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems that the latest officially stable version of gsl (gnu scientific
> library) is 2.1. The repository is at 1.16, and I don't see anything more
> recent in [testing] or AUR.
>
> Is there an intention to update
Hi all,
It seems that the latest officially stable version of gsl (gnu scientific
library) is 2.1. The repository is at 1.16, and I don't see anything more
recent in [testing] or AUR.
Is there an intention to update this package straight to 2.1, or to introduce
a gsl2 package? I've no proble
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 17:56:30 +0100
Magnus Therning wrote:
> I've just updated a sligtly neglected machine I have (not upgraded since
> mid-September). Thanks to the [ARA][1] I managed to upgrade it in weekly
> steps. It all seemed to work fine, and indeed it boots just fine.
> There's only one li
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 06:07:00PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 04:58:27PM +, Ben Oliver wrote:
> > On 15 Nov 2015 4:56 pm, "Magnus Therning" wrote:
> > >
> > > I've just updated a sligtly neglected machine I have (not upgraded since
> > > mid-September). Thanks to t
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 04:58:27PM +, Ben Oliver wrote:
> On 15 Nov 2015 4:56 pm, "Magnus Therning" wrote:
> >
> > I've just updated a sligtly neglected machine I have (not upgraded since
> > mid-September). Thanks to the [ARA][1] I managed to upgrade it in weekly
> > steps. It all seemed to w
On 15 Nov 2015 4:56 pm, "Magnus Therning" wrote:
>
> I've just updated a sligtly neglected machine I have (not upgraded since
> mid-September). Thanks to the [ARA][1] I managed to upgrade it in weekly
> steps. It all seemed to work fine, and indeed it boots just fine.
> There's only one little thi
I've just updated a sligtly neglected machine I have (not upgraded since
mid-September). Thanks to the [ARA][1] I managed to upgrade it in weekly
steps. It all seemed to work fine, and indeed it boots just fine.
There's only one little thing that's broken: the mouse buttons don't
work.
Yes, it's r
9 matches
Mail list logo
