Bruno Pagani writes:
> Le 03/01/2016 02:24, Magnus Therning a écrit :
[..]
> Sorry but you missed something: even if it was indeed prior to 43, this
> is still no new info. Because if you read the bug carefully, you will
> see this line:
>
> “ - Firefox 42: Release and Beta versions of Firefox
On 2016-01-03 06:11, Kyle Terrien wrote:
> On 01/02/2016 05:24 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> The larger, and very philosophical question is "How user un-friendly can
>> upstream make it before Arch decides to *not* package as upstream
>> intends?" (Answering this requires keeping in mind that Arch
2 matches
Mail list logo
