[arch-general] linux 4.4 bad package - wont install

2016-01-14 Thread Genes Lists
There is a bug with the PKGFILE which is too aggressive copying files with names containing Kconfig. Consequence is upon install attempt: error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) /usr/lib/modules/4.4.0-1-ARCH/build/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 exists in both

Re: [arch-general] linux 4.4 bad package - wont install

2016-01-14 Thread Genes Lists
Work around for users is just to ignore the bad package until its fixed: pacman -Syu --ignore linux-docs g

[arch-general] Unable to get remote rpcinfo information

2016-01-14 Thread niya levi
Hi everyone can anyone see why i cannot get remote rpcinfo information from across the network ? ## NFS SERVER # testy systemctl status rpcbind ● rpcbind.service - RPC bind service Loaded: loaded

Re: [arch-general] Samsung EVO 850 TRIM Bug Fixed?

2016-01-14 Thread Gustavo De Nardin (spuk)
On 14 January 2016 at 21:10, Mauro Santos wrote: > There were two different bugs that came up at different times, one is > drives that don't work properly with queued trim and another was the bug > with raid. > Alright, thanks for clearing that up. I see there's

Re: [arch-general] linux 4.4 bad package - wont install

2016-01-14 Thread Genes Lists
FYI - same problem with linux-docs-4.4-2-x86_64 package.

Re: [arch-general] Samsung EVO 850 TRIM Bug Fixed?

2016-01-14 Thread Mauro Santos
On 14-01-2016 21:50, Gustavo De Nardin (spuk) wrote: > According to (updates on) that same blog post, that bug was found not to be > specific to Samsung or any other drives, but in the kernel handling of TRIM > on software RAID. > > Quoting: > """... UPDATE July 17: > We have just finished a

[arch-general] Samsung EVO 850 TRIM Bug Fixed?

2016-01-14 Thread Andrew Martin
Hello, I installed Arch on an EVO 850 120GB SSD. I read about the linux EVO 800-series TRIM bug a few months ago: https://blog.algolia.com/when-solid-state-drives-are-not-that-solid/ However it appeared to have been fixed in the 4.1 kernel release:

Re: [arch-general] Samsung EVO 850 TRIM Bug Fixed?

2016-01-14 Thread Andrew Martin
Thanks for the clarification on this! Andrew On 14 January 2016 at 19:43, Gustavo De Nardin (spuk) wrote: > On 14 January 2016 at 21:10, Mauro Santos > wrote: > > > There were two different bugs that came up at different times, one is > >

Re: [arch-general] linux 4.4 bad package - wont install

2016-01-14 Thread Jens Adam
Also FYI: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47753 --byte pgp_HD4DMW6HB.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [arch-general] Samsung EVO 850 TRIM Bug Fixed?

2016-01-14 Thread Garmine 42
Hi, Arch runs the vanilla kernel with a few patches (literally something like 3), so if it is really fixed in vanilla it is fixed in Arch. Regards, Garmine 2016. jan. 14. du. 8:20 ezt írta ("Andrew Martin" ): > Hello, > > I installed Arch on an EVO 850 120GB SSD. I

Re: [arch-general] Samsung EVO 850 TRIM Bug Fixed?

2016-01-14 Thread Gustavo De Nardin (spuk)
According to (updates on) that same blog post, that bug was found not to be specific to Samsung or any other drives, but in the kernel handling of TRIM on software RAID. Quoting: """... UPDATE July 17: We have just finished a conference call with Samsung considering the failure analysis of this