On 11-02-16 17:12, João Miguel wrote:
now there are no AUR packages for OpenRC.
You are wrong, please be more specific.
This is current situation:
- run AL without using systemd as PID1 / init system :
Aur and AL wiki have everything you need for that.
You will still have systemd installed
> >now there are no AUR packages for OpenRC.
> You are wrong, please be more specific.
Sorry, I mean Artoo's way is no longer available in the AUR. openrc-core
and all init srcipts he posted are gone (because of the bad community
pressure, which was my point).
> This is current situation:
>
> -
>
> It's ok now not because of the wiki and the AUR, but thanks to the
> existence of systemd-free.org. It had to be created because of the
> above, which would'nt have happened with a better community.
So far I've not seen anyone in this thread, or in the replies by Poettering
referenced by
> > It's ok now not because of the wiki and the AUR, but thanks to the
> > existence of systemd-free.org. It had to be created because of the
> > above, which would'nt have happened with a better community.
>
> So far I've not seen anyone in this thread, or in the replies by Poettering
>
I had asked Nous and Artoo whether it was worth placing those packages
back in the AUR, and they said it wasn't, so I gave up. But maybe
systemd-free.org can be referred instead of the AUR.
About "the right way", I'm not sure it's true, for example, the Wiki
lists at least 3 ways to use an nvidia
> Someone already talked about putting it back in the forums. They were
> turned down because of those points («no reason for 2 methods», etc.).
> This among other things (which are evident in any discussion in Arch
> about OpenRC) signals a bad community.
When it comes to Linux there are often
>
>
> > when the (in MHO excellent) choice to package systemd by default has
> > already been made and it works perfectly well?
> I never said systemd shouldn't be packaged by default!
Apologies, poor wording on my part. That wasn't meant to imply you ever
did. I understood you wanted an
I feel it pertinent to point out that a different rolling-release
distrobution ( http://www.voidlinux.eu/ ) does not use systemd, openrc, or
sysvinit. Void Linux uses runit exclusively, and thus patches projects like
KDE4 and Gnome3 to work without systemd (I don't mention KDE5 since nobody
has
On 02/12/2016 11:50 PM, Toyam Cox wrote:
> I feel it pertinent to point out that a different rolling-release
> distrobution ( http://www.voidlinux.eu/ ) does not use systemd, openrc, or
> sysvinit. Void Linux uses runit exclusively, and thus patches projects like
> KDE4 and Gnome3 to work without
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 4:12:24 PM CST João Miguel wrote:
>
> I agree with you, the devs have more work to do, etc., but the cause of
> these never-ending discussions must be pointed out: community attitude.
> Bear with me for a moment:
>
> OpenRC was working fine in Arch. Artoo's way was
10 matches
Mail list logo
