Re: [arch-general] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose?

On 01/09/2017 09:45 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: >> >> I still try to use cblrepo to track dependency versions, I just don't >> use it to generate PKGBUILDs directly. > > I *love* hearing that it's being used. I'm just throwing this out > there... if ArchHaskell goes the way of the dodo I'd be more

Re: [arch-general] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose?

On 01/09/2017 06:23 PM, Nicola Squartini via arch-general wrote: > > 1. How do you manage dependencies and rebuilds of Haskell packages > > without using cblrepo? > > I still try to use cblrepo to track dependency versions, I just don't > use it to generate PKGBUILDs directly. > > > 2. Shouldn't

Re: [arch-general] NILFS: A filesystem designed to minimize the likelyhood of data loss

Am Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:46:08 -0600 schrieb mike lojkovic via arch-general : > As far as I'm aware BTRFS would be a better choice. Believe it's > getting close to release. Honestly, I don't agree. NILFS has features that Btrfs will never have, simply because of it's

Re: [arch-general] About linux 4.8 and 4.9...

Le 09/01/2017 à 20:18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general a écrit : > On 01/09/2017 02:07 PM, Bruno Pagani via arch-general wrote: >>> Does this mean we will see 4.8.16 being built and pushed out to users? >> This could indeed be done (it’s even 4.8.17 as of today) if 4.9.2 still >> doesn’t fix those

Re: [arch-general] About linux 4.8 and 4.9...

On 01/09/2017 02:07 PM, Bruno Pagani via arch-general wrote: >> Does this mean we will see 4.8.16 being built and pushed out to users? > > This could indeed be done (it’s even 4.8.17 as of today) if 4.9.2 still > doesn’t fix those issues (it has been discussed before that Arch should > continue

Re: [arch-general] About linux 4.8 and 4.9...

Le 09/01/2017 à 12:24, Phil Wyett via arch-general a écrit : > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 12:06 +0100, fredbezies via arch-general wrote: >> Sorry to reply to Phil Wyet this way. I enabled digest mode for arch- >> general. >> >> You won't see soon linux 4.9.x in core because it is kinda rotten >> with

Re: [arch-general] NILFS: A filesystem designed to minimize the likelyhood of data loss

As far as I'm aware BTRFS would be a better choice. Believe it's getting close to release. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Alexander Rath wrote: > Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2017 17:20:49 CET schrieb Sean Greenslade: > >> On January 9, 2017 7:39:26 AM PST, Alexander Rath <

Re: [arch-general] NILFS: A filesystem designed to minimize the likelyhood of data loss

Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2017 17:20:49 CET schrieb Sean Greenslade: On January 9, 2017 7:39:26 AM PST, Alexander Rath wrote: Hello! I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:

Re: [arch-general] NILFS: A filesystem designed to minimize the likelyhood of data loss

On 09-01-2017 15:39, Alexander Rath wrote: > Hello! > > I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2: > https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15091 > > Did anybody try to install Arch on a NILFS2-formatted partition?

[arch-general] NILFS: A filesystem designed to minimize the likelyhood of data loss

Hello! I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2: https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15091 Did anybody try to install Arch on a NILFS2-formatted partition? Best regards, Alexander

Re: [arch-general] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose?

Felix Yan writes: > On 01/09/2017 07:26 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: >> Well, the subject line says it all really. Does ArchHaskell still >> have a role in the Arch world? > > Actually I am planning to make everything dynamic-linked in next GHC > release, and kill all

Re: [arch-general] [arch-haskell] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose?

Johan Holmquist writes: > I'd say that binary packages are really valuable for installing a > global haskell dev environment for quick hacks and scripts for which > it would not be practical to setup a project and download and build a > lot of deps. At least ghc and base

Re: [arch-general] Arch install broken by invalid signatures (anthraxx) using 201610 iso

On 01/08/2017 08:11 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > I'll download a new iso and try, but I'd be > surprised if an iso less than 5 months old no longer works? > Well IMO 5 months is pretty damn ancient in the Arch Linux world. :p Most of the time a simple keyring package update does the trick:

Re: [arch-general] About linux 4.8 and 4.9...

On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 12:06 +0100, fredbezies via arch-general wrote: > Sorry to reply to Phil Wyet this way. I enabled digest mode for arch- > general. > > You won't see soon linux 4.9.x in core because it is kinda rotten > with > some Intel CPUs. > > You cannot get it to boot on some intel

[arch-general] About linux 4.8 and 4.9...

Sorry to reply to Phil Wyet this way. I enabled digest mode for arch-general. You won't see soon linux 4.9.x in core because it is kinda rotten with some Intel CPUs. You cannot get it to boot on some intel CPUs like an old T4200 or younger ones. See these bugs reports :

Re: [arch-general] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose?

On 01/09/2017 07:26 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > Well, the subject line says it all really. Does ArchHaskell still have > a role in the Arch world? Actually I am planning to make everything dynamic-linked in next GHC release, and kill all static libraries in the packages. This way haskell

Re: [arch-general] Does ArchHaskell still have purpose?

On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 00:26 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: > Hi all, > > Well, the subject line says it all really. Does ArchHaskell still > have > a role in the Arch world? Thanks Magnus for raising this topic. I actually have a few questions for the maintener of Haskell in [community] (Felix):