Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

2017-05-08 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em maio 8, 2017 18:15 Eli Schwartz via arch-general escreveu: Why are you making such a circus out of this??? I ask you the same. Please stop replying to others using phrases in all caps. Thank you, Giancarlo Razzolini pgpJGIqylk_k5.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

2017-05-08 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 05/08/2017 01:45 PM, Carsten Mattner wrote: >> Is the idea that I create a machine local repo that has highest prio >> and overrides arch extra/testing? Otherwise, I don't know how to unbreak >> the cycle while only building

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

2017-05-08 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 05/08/2017 01:45 PM, Carsten Mattner wrote: > Is the idea that I create a machine local repo that has highest prio > and overrides arch extra/testing? Otherwise, I don't know how to unbreak > the cycle while only building a custom ffmpeg. Granted that it is a moot point anyway since your initia

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

2017-05-08 Thread Doug Newgard
On Mon, 8 May 2017 13:15:31 -0600 Leonid Isaev wrote: > I don't understand... testing/libx264 contains /usr/include/x264.h and doesn't > depend on ffmpeg, no? > > Cheers, There's been another reshuffle of the x264 packages. The "lib" packages were just symlinks when this thread started.

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

2017-05-08 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 05:45:09PM +, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general > wrote: > > On 05/07/2017 02:28 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > >> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Doug Newgard > >> wrote: > >>> And

Re: [arch-general] libx264 changes

2017-05-08 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 05/07/2017 02:28 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: >> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: >>> And again, the cycle doesn't matter at all if your ffmpeg package is set up >>> correctly. >> >> I don'

Re: [arch-general] AIF-NG (feedback/Request for Comments)

2017-05-08 Thread brent s.
On 05/08/2017 11:46 AM, Bart De Roy via arch-general wrote: > Thank you for sharing! I could try AIF-NG and some of > your other projects in a few weeks on an old laptop. > > The link to the kernels 'submitting patches' document > has changed to > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/s

Re: [arch-general] AIF-NG (feedback/Request for Comments)

2017-05-08 Thread Bart De Roy via arch-general
Thank you for sharing! I could try AIF-NG and some of your other projects in a few weeks on an old laptop. The link to the kernels 'submitting patches' document has changed to https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst signature.asc Description: PGP signature