Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

Hey all, On October 14, 2017 4:10:15 AM GMT+02:00, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >On 14 October 2017 at 06:51, Rashif Ray Rahman >wrote: >> Thanks for your support and interest. As I already have more than one >> proposal we can consider it taken care of,

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On 14 October 2017 at 06:51, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > Thanks for your support and interest. As I already have more than one > proposal we can consider it taken care of, for packages in community. > I will see how we can set up a dedicated mailing list since that's > what

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On 14 October 2017 at 01:58, Marcelo "Marc" Ranolfi via arch-general wrote: > Guys, > > Great to see this brought up here. > > I've been using Ardour 5.12 for quite a while now, along with recent > versions of some of the other packages listed. To be honest I've been >

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

Guys, Great to see this brought up here. I've been using Ardour 5.12 for quite a while now, along with recent versions of some of the other packages listed. To be honest I've been a little bit self-centered, checking out and updating packages to my benefit using ABS. So I take this opportunity

Re: [arch-general] Server Management Tools

Well, First you have shellscript, based on ssh client and gnu parallel. Second you can write your own python script with paramiko and parallel library Third you can look to fabric (http://www.fabfile.org/) Fourth, you can easely learn Ansible, which tends to become the #1 server management

Re: [arch-general] Server Management Tools

On 2017-10-13 21:14, Karol Babioch wrote: > unexpected errors. Indeed, this is the most terrifying of messages to ever appear. You just ran a command across N machines, two of them failed. Ugh. The *BEST* case is things like e.g. "apt-get update" failing because of a spurious mirror resolution

Re: [arch-general] Server Management Tools

Hi, Am 12.10.2017 um 21:31 schrieb siefke_lis...@web.de: > Who say something from unattended? I want not only set 20 times the same > command. That's all. Look into clusterssh then. You'll get the output of all commands on all servers and can interact with a only a single one, in case there are

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:25:37 +0600, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >It is NOT true that there is no pro-audio community. ArchAudio was >just inactive because nobody stepped up to take over maintenance from >me. It had a fully functioning website, forums, mailing list, and >partially functioning

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

ray rashif , i thank you for your job around ardour , that i really use daily. In the last two years i've lost the pleasure of using your package, out to date for 10 mounths in a row too. I email you sometime in two years to tell you if you need help for testing/mantain an update arch ardour

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

Em outubro 13, 2017 10:25 Rashif Ray Rahman escreveu: - I still believe my extra packages I can somehow continue to update myself, as there has been talk about new servers which would make my life easier (sometimes my network latencies are so high to the build server I have to just quit and go

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On 13 October 2017 at 18:56, David Runge wrote: > On October 13, 2017 2:02:42 PM GMT+02:00, Mark Raynsford > wrote: >>I use Ardour daily. I'd like to volunteer to help, but I'm not sure >>what's involved. > In the case of Ardour luckily

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On 2017-10-13T01:02:54 +0200 Rob Til Freedmen via arch-general wrote: > ... for these long outdated packages? > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==schiv=Flagged > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==speps=Flagged I use

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

> Original Message > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ... > Local Time: October 13, 2017 9:01 AM > UTC Time: October 13, 2017 7:01 AM > From: arch-general@archlinux.org > To: arch-general@archlinux.org > Leonidas Spyropoulos > >

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

Hey all, On October 13, 2017 11:08:21 AM GMT+02:00, Antonio Rojas wrote: >El Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:35:21 +0200, Sebastian Lau via arch-general >escribió: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I can adopt few if they drop to AUR (of if I get sponsor to apply >for a >>> TU). >>> >>> Regards, >>>

Re: [arch-general] Is there anything keeping the refind version back?

> Original Message > Subject: [arch-general] Is there anything keeping the refind version back? > Local Time: October 13, 2017 11:21 AM > UTC Time: October 13, 2017 9:21 AM > From: arch-general@archlinux.org > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux >

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On 13.10.2017 11:14, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/13/17 at 10:35am, Sebastian Lau via arch-general wrote: >> On 13.10.2017 09:01, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote: >>> On 13/10/17, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:02:54 +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > ...

[arch-general] Is there anything keeping the refind version back?

refind-efi, in the repo, is at 10.8-1. The package has been flagged out of date for 2 months now. The current release is 0.11.1.

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

Hi, On 10/13/17 at 10:35am, Sebastian Lau via arch-general wrote: > On 13.10.2017 09:01, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote: > > On 13/10/17, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:02:54 +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > >>> ... for these long outdated packages? > >>> > >>>

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

El Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:35:21 +0200, Sebastian Lau via arch-general escribió: >> Hello, >> >> I can adopt few if they drop to AUR (of if I get sponsor to apply for a >> TU). >> >> Regards, >> Leonidas >> >> > Hello, > > I would do the same for a few of that listed packages under the same >

Re: [arch-general] Thank you for keeping 32 bit alive

On 10/12/17 at 03:13pm, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 04:09:06PM -0400, theodore.preunin...@lycos.com wrote: > > The current issue of Distro Watch Weekly has some topics including if 32-bit > > prematurely obsoleted or not. > > > >

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On 13.10.2017 09:01, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote: > On 13/10/17, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:02:54 +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: >>> ... for these long outdated packages? >>> >>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==schiv=Flagged >>> >>>

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On 13/10/17, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:02:54 +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: > >... for these long outdated packages? > > > >https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==schiv=Flagged > > > >https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==speps=Flagged Hello, I

Re: [arch-general] Can we please have a co-maintainer ...

On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:02:54 +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote: >... for these long outdated packages? > >https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==schiv=Flagged > >https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==speps=Flagged Hi, the real problem IMO is, that we don't have an