Re: [arch-general] AUR IProblem

2020-01-03 Thread Josef Miegl
>12  ex9k1.dc7.fsn1.hetzner.com (213.239.229.238)  46.214 ms >ex9k1.dc7.fsn1.hetzner.com (213.239.229.234)  46.021 ms  46.034 ms > >13  * * * Seems like luna.archlinux.org is dropping traffic from your IP. It may or may not be temporary (arch infrastructure uses fail2ban). I would suggest

Re: [arch-general] AUR IProblem

2020-01-03 Thread Josef Miegl
On January 4, 2020 3:46:30 AM GMT+01:00, heis snow via arch-general wrote: >Hello, im having an issue with aur.archlinux.org, i cant access, i cant >even ping (time out) with the router. AFAIK arch.archlinux.org is hosted on a Hetzner VPS. This could be a routing/peering problem on Hetzners

[arch-general] AUR IProblem

2020-01-03 Thread heis snow via arch-general
Hello, im having an issue with aur.archlinux.org, i cant access, i cant even ping (time out) with the router. I called my ISP and theres nothing they can do, users in the IRC channel #archlinux told me that sounds like an issue on arch's end, i dont know who to report this or what to do thanks

[arch-general] community/espeak-ng

2020-01-03 Thread Jude DaShiell
Does this package need some systemd additions like service files? If not, how can espeak-ng be configured so it starts up whenever a computer is booted? It's got no page in the archwiki and if I can get a replacement of espeak done speech-dispatcher will work with it and if speech-dispatcher

Re: [arch-general] Adding a "posix" metapackage

2020-01-03 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 1/3/20 10:49 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Santiago, > >> I'm curious, though, are there any specifics about the providers on >> these POSIX tools/libraries/whatnot (i.e., would it be wortwhile >> discussing the alternatives?). > > Is sh being provided by bash(1)? A more POSIX-compliant

Re: [arch-general] Adding a "posix" metapackage

2020-01-03 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Santiago, > I'm curious, though, are there any specifics about the providers on > these POSIX tools/libraries/whatnot (i.e., would it be wortwhile > discussing the alternatives?). Is sh being provided by bash(1)? A more POSIX-compliant shell may be better, one that doesn't let lots of