On 06/18/10 01:05, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/18/2010 03:48 AM, J. McBlane wrote:
Arch Security Enhancement Team?
Securing Arch For Everyone?
Arch Guard?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:46:59PM +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On to the first order of business. As the subject says, what should
On 05/26/10 07:27, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Do you really like to use extremely outdated, buggy and dead code?
Jörg
Yes
On 05/06/10 08:20, Diogo Franco wrote:
On 05/ 6/10 06:08 AM, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
outdated: Arch also offers an [unsupported] section in the Arch Linux
User Repository (AUR), which contains over 9,000 build scripts It
should say over 21.000 build scripts.
IT'S OVER NINE THOUSND!!
On 05/06/10 19:40, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 18:54 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
On 05/06/10 08:20, Diogo Franco wrote:
On 05/ 6/10 06:08 AM, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
outdated: Arch also offers an [unsupported] section in the Arch Linux
User Repository (AUR), which contains over 9,000
Brendan Long wrote:
On 03/04/2010 05:22 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
The only thing I really need from KDE is the Konqueror web browser.
Wait.. someone who actually likes Konqueror? Why?
Because I can allow javascript per url.
I can turn off javascript as a default and then turn
Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:
[putolin]
point and rebuttal is rather childish and silly, the principal is, KDE
4 isn't perfect. The version of KDE 3 you are using is the last, and
thus I imagine in many ways, it is perfect. Everything works, and it
is stable software. The first version of KDE 3
Allan McRae wrote:
On 05/03/10 11:03, Andreas Wagner wrote:
Hello,
I am thoroughly enjoying using arch linux so I have tried to register
for the Arch forums. I have tried several times but I get the message:
Bots are unwelcome here. The door is right over there, don't let it hit
you on the
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:36 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:19:04PM -0500, Ray Kohler wrote:
It is *required* to do only complete system updates when using Arch.
Partial updates are not supported, *by design*.
If that is true,
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Andrew Antle andrew.an...@gmail.com wrote:
As root, create the file `$HOME/.bash_profile` with the content:
 . $HOME/.bashrc
This file is in `/etc/skel` as well.
So I need to do the following?
cd /root
echo .$HOME/.bashrc
Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
Arch should do something like Fedora/Redhat. Maintain 1-2 previous kernels
so that if a new one is buggy, then the old one can be used.
Dan McGee wrote:
2010/2/1 Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com:
On 02/01/2010 08:53 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 15:59 +0100, ludovic coues wrote:
2010/2/1 Emmanuel Benistybenist...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have preformed some tests and guess what cdrkit works! Imagine that.
It burnt the iso's for Slackware distribution, and using md5sum to sum
both a Slackware distribution disk burned by both cdrkit and cdrtools
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I mean I assume that you have a big technical knowledge. Otherwise you
wouldn't be able to write such a program and build such an Open Solaris
LiveCD. But I also can understand that some people feel being attacked
by you. On
David C. Rankin wrote:
Listmates
I had a failing drive in my arch server so I installed a new one. The bios raid
'nvidia dmraid' provides the feature to 'Rebuild' the array and allows for
adding the new disk to the array. After that configuration you are prompted to
Boot to an OS that supports
Jim Pryor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 07:53:10AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
On Friday 08 January 2010 03:54:23 Allan McRae wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
Yep, my /etc/hosts file was definitely changed:
#
# /etc/hosts: static lookup table for host names
#
127.0.0.1
Tom wrote:
I was just forced to waste 10 min of my life because of arch-linux-way
'of doing things'.
*rant mode on*
Let me elaborate,
for quite some time now, I've been unappeased by the way arch-linux
handles the boot-up process, not so much by how it actually does it (it
normally gets the job
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:51:32 +0100
Alexander Duscheleit ji...@archlinux.us wrote:
(..)
okay so long story short, you only want the mdadm.conf updating in AIF.
there's a catch about your proposal though:
- it's hard to parse fstab
- you would only know the blockdevices
Tom wrote:
While it is a hair misleading, entering the root password at this
point gets you to your system.
No, it does not. You get dropped to a promt, I don't know which
'init-level' its on, but it generally does not get you to your system
like a normal boot.
Single user is the init level
Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:49:40 -0500
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
[putolin]
Notice no initrd in the above
I'm not entirely sure, *how* the system manages to find raid-members
and assembles them in this cases.
A while ago there was a kernel-level
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 09:48:24 am Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
Try the params on the /boot/grub/menu.lst line
OK - So I am starting from scratch again since my previous attempt
failed. I boot from the disk. Load
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 10:21:19 am dave reisner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
Try the params on the /boot/grub/menu.lst line
OK - So I am starting from
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 10:36:49 am Carlos Williams wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:21 AM, dave reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
With mdadm in your initrd, you don't need to specify the parameters of
the array in Grub. Foregoing that, the first parameter passed to the
md option is
On Monday 11 January 2010 12:52:57 pm Carlos Williams wrote:
OK - I am once again attempting to use Arch install for 2010 on my
system which has two identical hard drives and I simply want to mirror
both drives in a RAID1 array. I have read the Wiki so much at this
point it has become
On Monday 11 January 2010 13:36:06 Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
I always wait cat /proc/mdstat until the raid is finished, even though it
says you don't have to, I don't want any trouble :)
I see your point but when you
On Friday 08 January 2010 10:23:20 Magnus Therning wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
FYI
I was having trouble with networking several years ago and had a
/etc/host like yours. I posted to usenet and the network gurus there
promptly
On Friday 08 January 2010 19:18:46 Paul Ezvan wrote:
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 17:44 -0600, David C. Rankin a écrit :
On 01/08/2010 03:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
hi List,
I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
I looked at the wiki re the various methods
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 16:13:21 David C. Rankin wrote:
Listmates (Tobias)
I have a server that has 2 dmraid arrays (4 drives - 2 arrays) that has
been bullet-proof for years. A month ago (either coincidentally or due to
a bug in the suse 11.2 kernel for client ssh/sftp
On Sunday 20 December 2009 03:12:21 Robert Howard wrote:
The path to the PolicyKit settings on my machine are:
System Settings - Advanced Tab - PolicyKit Authorization.
Ok I found that and I have two entries one for k3b and one for org.freedesktop
What do I put there ?
And What am I
On Saturday 19 December 2009 15:29:58 Robert Howard wrote:
Make sure that the permissions are set correctly for console kit via the
KDE system settings applet. This was my problem with automount awhile
back.
I don't understand what your saying.
I looked at the KDE systems app and I don't see
Carlos Williams wrote:
[putolin]
:: Initramfs Completed - control passing to kinit
IP-Config: no devices to configure
Waiting 0 s before mounting root device...
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3-fs: mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
INIT: version 2.86 booting
INIT: No
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Not valid. Â Use makepkg -L to log the entire build process. Â In the
future, there will be a check() function, so you will then get separate logs
for build(), check
I am constructing a PKGBUILD for a package and I know some of the
variables have been depreciated
Has $startdir been removed if so what is it new equiv.
Thanks
Allan McRae wrote:
Stefan Husmann wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
Thorsten Toepper wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:08:02 -0400
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I am constructing a PKGBUILD for a package and I know some of the
variables
Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Stefan Husmann wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
Thorsten Toepper wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:08:02 -0400
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I am constructing a PKGBUILD
I have a base install that I have placed on a USB thumb drive.
I need to get grub to boot it by uuid or label so I can boot it from any PC
I can get it to boot using a kernel line like this:
# (0) Arch Linux
title Arch Linux (x86_64)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sdd1 rootdelay=15
Lucas Salies Brum wrote:
One more question, if the old system was 32 bits and I would put a 64 bits
system using the same home folder I have a problem?
No
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 18:23 -0700, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 14:48 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 13:20 +0200, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
Le Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:35:04 -0400,
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com a écrit :
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 18:23 -0700, Aaron Griffin wrote:
https://dev.archlinux.org/packages/core/i686/pacman/
Deps are libarchive, libdownload
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 21:41 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I think I'll stop now, I lost count
full list:
pactree -u pacman | sort
acl
attr
bash
bzip2
coreutils
cracklib
db
gcc-libs
gdbm
glibc
gmp
kernel-headers
libarchive
libdownload
ncurses
openssl
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 13:38 +0100, Nathan K. Bathory wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:55:33 -0400
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 21:41 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I think I'll stop now, I lost count
full list
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 18:05 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
If you look at what is required in pacman you get
Pacman: depends=('bash' 'libarchive=2.6.0' 'libdownload=1.3'
'pacman-mirrorlist')
pacman-mirrorlist is just one file which you could include in pacman if
you
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 20:25 +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 13:35, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Secure Connection Failed
dev.archlinux.org uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed.
(Error code:
I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or
the binaries.
I need this for an older system (distro)
Is it still available?
Thanks
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:13 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or
the binaries.
I need this for an older system (distro)
Is it still available?
ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/pacman/
PKGBUILDs
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 14:48 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 13:03, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or
the binaries.
I need this for an older system (distro)
Is it still available?
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:36 -0400, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Gerhard Brauergerhard.bra...@web.de wrote:
Not sure if i understand: You don't boot from the raid arrays, correct?
These are only data or whatever arrays which you mount to /mnt/mdX?
Correct.
Have
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:55 -0400, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
That's the filesystem on the raid array.
The partition type should be fd... you set that using fdisk
The fd tells a system that the partition is part of a
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 12:01 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
First off, I don't like modifying config files. But, given I did this
update and still managed to screw my system up when testing it with a
reboot...
So it is a question of which I hate more; post install messages or
automatically
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 12:20 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 22:01, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
post_install()
{
if [ -f /etc/inittab.pacnew ]; then
echo You are being very stupid if you did not take notice of that
warning
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 22:34 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sun 19 Jul 2009 12:01 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
First off, I don't like modifying config files. But, given I did
this update and still managed to screw my system up when testing it
with a reboot...
So it is a question of which I
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 23:03 -0400, Matthew wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
First off, I don't like modifying config files. But, given I did this
update and still managed to screw my system up when testing it with a
reboot...
So it is a question of which I hate more; post install messages
I am getting this error tring to build gnome-vfs in a clean chroot
gnutls is installed by pacman ( called by makepkg -s -r )
Is libgnutls-config supposed to be in the gnutls package... If it is it
is missing
checking for gcrypt.h... yes
checking for libgnutls-config... no
checking for
Anyone know what this error is about?
What package gives gssglue?
I am building in a clean chroot and it fails
Building outside clean chroot works
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for GSSGLUE... no
checking for
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 12:33 +0100, Nathan K. Bathory wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 07:28:20 -0400
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Anyone know what this error is about?
What package gives gssglue?
I am building in a clean chroot and it fails
Building outside clean chroot
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 14:12 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 07:28 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Anyone know what this error is about?
What package gives gssglue?
I am building in a clean chroot and it fails
Building outside clean chroot works
Does it fail some commands
module-init-tools.patch is missing in the abs tree for x86_64
It is only in the abs/core/ndiswrapper-utils tree and not for 64 bit
For X86_64
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
For X86_64
Might be nice if you posted which file actually failed.
There are several but a makepkg -g PKGBUILD fixes it
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 12:40 -0300, Guilherme M. Nogueira wrote:
I was just wondering...
what happens if one of the drives in the lvm array goes dead?
It dies
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 19:26 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
Listmates,
I have more fun in store for this weekend. After testing
dmraid-1.0.0rc15, I had downgraded a number of packages that were installed
from testing back to there normal versions but had left dmraid-1.0.0rc15 and
I am following the process for the rebuild of all the package that
depends on libjpeg.
When rebuilding packages due to another package like libjpeg does the
package release number for the dependent package get bumped?
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 23:04 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I am following the process for the rebuild of all the package that
depends on libjpeg.
When rebuilding packages due to another package like libjpeg does the
package release number for the dependent package get bumped
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 23:54 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 23:04 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I am following the process for the rebuild of all the package that
depends on libjpeg.
When rebuilding packages due to another
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 17:50 -0300, Guilherme M. Nogueira wrote:
Try reading HAL wiki page, specially the Troubleshooting section
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HAL
Ok salamat po
I am getting a message on boot that I need to change the modules line in
rc.conf to the new way which is to put the conf file into modprobe.d.
Is there any info on this?
I have some modules I want to blacklist and some to load.
Is the format the same as modprobe.conf? ( I presume )
I take it I
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 19:05 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I am getting a message on boot that I need to change the modules line in
rc.conf to the new way which is to put the conf file into modprobe.d.
Is there any
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 22:49 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
List,
[putolin]
(Note: if you were smart enough to save the fdisk -l information for
your drives, you can simply fdisk
your array and be done)
This may bee of some use to you:
http://linux.die.net/man/8/sfdisk
I have completed to setup my new 64-bit system. This new kernel solved
some slow down in the open source radeonhd grapihcs driver as it is on
par with the open source ati driver... large improvement.
I am now going to install the 32-bit arch version on this machine also.
I have looked into
David C. Rankin wrote:
On Friday 19 June 2009 03:58:39 am Baho Utot wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I see that the i686 version of arch only sees 3.25G of the 8G installed.
Does the i686 kernel support PAE?
No it does not, but you can rebuild it yourself
Can't connect to kde-unstable or testing
[scra...@arch-64 ~]$ pacman -Syy
error: could not register 'kde-unstable' database (unexpected system
error)
[scra...@arch-64 ~]$ pacman -Syy
error: could not register 'testing' database (unexpected system error)
Want to try KDE-4.3 on 64 bit
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 18:48 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
Can't connect to kde-unstable or testing
[scra...@arch-64 ~]$ pacman -Syy
error: could not register 'kde-unstable' database (unexpected system
error)
[scra...@arch-64 ~]$ pacman -Syy
error: could not register 'testing' database
Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I see that the i686 version of arch only sees 3.25G of the 8G installed.
Does the i686 kernel support PAE?
No it does not, but you can rebuild it yourself using ABS.
Allan
OK
I see that the i686 version of arch only sees 3.25G of the 8G installed.
Does the i686 kernel support PAE?
I have not gotten to install X86_64 but I am working on it
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 23:21 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I am gathering info on this new system
I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P motherboard
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AM3 socket 2.6G
8GB High performance
:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have setup a new computer with a clean install with
kernel26-2.6.29.4-1 does this kernel support unionfs?
This is the second system I have had trouble
:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have setup
:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have setup
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:09 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
Is there any way to tell which version of gcc an executable is
compiled with?
Hello :)
Maybe can be a better way :) But this just works.
strings -a /the/file | grep -m1 GCC
Good Luck!
OK I
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have setup a new computer with a clean install with
kernel26-2.6.29.4-1 does this kernel support unionfs?
This is the second system
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:07 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
I can do thatif you can stand all the bug reports :)
My script just finished and it found another 400+ that didn't build,
that will take some time to go through to find the ones that didn't
build because
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I
I am gathering info on this new system
I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P motherboard
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AM3 socket 2.6G
8GB High performance DDR3 ram
Radeon HD 4670
Will arch 64 install and run on this?
With little trouble? :)
I
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 02:57 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I am gathering info on this new system
I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P motherboard
Is there any way to tell which version of gcc an executable is compiled
with?
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 21:23 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Biru Ionut schrieb:
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 19:06 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Can we kill gcc3 and gcc34 from extra? We used to need them for qemu,
but that's fixed, so they're useless. Objections?
Move it to
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:13 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
-1 from me
IMHO I would like it to see them stay in extra
For example : imlib which has errors compiling with gcc-4.4.0
compiles fine with gcc-3.4
I have setup a new computer with a clean install with
kernel26-2.6.29.4-1 does this kernel support unionfs?
This is the second system I have had trouble with.
Devtools always complains like this
building union chroot
ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship!
FAILURE:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:51 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 18:46 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
I have encountered many packages in extra that don't compile with
gcc-4.4.0. The easy way to fix them is to compile them with gcc-3.4
The easy way to fix them is by reporting bugs
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have setup a new computer with a clean install with
kernel26-2.6.29.4-1 does this kernel support unionfs?
This is the second system I have had trouble with.
Devtools always complains like this
building union
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:45 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:51 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 18:46 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
I have encountered many packages in extra that don't compile with
gcc-4.4.0. The easy way to fix
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 11:07 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have install
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:49 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
Does it create complications if I install packages built with a newer
glibc-2.10.1-2 on a system with an older glibc-2.9-7?
Yes and no. Depending if the executable or library that is linked to
glibc uses
vorbis-tools gives me the following error
- bsdtar -x -f vorbis-tools-1.2.0.tar.gz
== Entering fakeroot environment...
== Starting build()...
aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61.
You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that,
you should regenerate
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 22:05 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 19:45, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Does it create complications if I install packages built with a newer
glibc-2.10.1-2 on a system with an older glibc-2.9-7?
According to LFS they say if you
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:54 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 04:53 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 22:05 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 19:45, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Does it create complications if I install packages
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:08 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:00 +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
== Finished making: vorbis-tools 1.2.0-3 i686 (Thu Jun 11 10:56:54 CEST
2009)
Did you remove srcdir?
autoconf 2.63-1
build()
{
cd
I have install namcap to my clean chroot and it gives me this error:
Error: Problem reading *.pkg.tar.gz
usage: /usr/bin/namcap [-r rulelist | --rules=rulelist] [-i | --info]
package ..
-r list: returns list of available rules
-i : prints information responses from rules
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have install namcap to my clean chroot and it gives me this error:
Error: Problem reading *.pkg.tar.gz
usage: /usr/bin/namcap [-r rulelist | --rules=rulelist] [-i | --info]
package ..
-r list: returns
I am try ing to build gmine and get this error
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gmime-2.2.21/src'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gmime-2.2.21/src'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gmime-2.2.21/src'
Making install in mono
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 11:07 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have install namcap to my clean chroot and it gives me this error:
Error: Problem reading *.pkg.tar.gz
usage: /usr/bin/namcap [-r
101 - 200 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
