Re: [arch-general] godep has been deprecated in favor of dep

On 2018-02-25 12:41, Jordan Glover via arch-general wrote: > I guess Adam request should be sent to package mantainer instead of public > list but other than that it's legit and I don't see the point of public rant > about > it. It doesn't help anyone. I agree it was unnecessary. The bottom

Re: [arch-general] AL gnustep-core implementation misses gnustep-back

On 2018-01-11 15:48, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-general wrote: > On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >> I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm >> definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to >> maintai

Re: [arch-general] AL gnustep-core implementation misses gnustep-back

On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm > definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to > maintain GNUstep in official repos, we should drop oolite. I'm going to drop oolite and remaining

Re: [arch-general] AL gnustep-core implementation misses gnustep-back

On 2018-01-09 13:04, LoneVVolf wrote: > In the recent repo clean up operation gnustep-back was dropped to AUR. > > I have maintained the oolite package when it was still in AUR and > remember plenty of problems with running oolite against faulty / > incomplete gnustep-core implementations . > >

Re: [arch-general] Proposal: add "--disable-modern-top" to procps-ng configure flags

Given how derailed this thread became, I'm enabling moderation for all new messages on arch-general from now on. Bartłomiej

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Switching the bugtracker to Bugzilla

On 2017-11-19 20:11, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > I've refrained from commenting on this topic because I don't want to > sound ungrateful people are taking the time to work on a fairly > extensive migration off flyspray, but I'm not looking forward to > Bugzilla (and I've contributed to a lot of

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Switching the bugtracker to Bugzilla

On 2017-11-19 17:58, William Gathoye wrote: > I'll be using Gitlab professionally on Arch Linux. So as soon I become a > TU (if it happen the Arch Linux community accepts me ;)) I think I'll > help Sven-Hendrik Haase in this process. Packaging Gitlab as a single > person is indeed a hard task.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Switching the bugtracker to Bugzilla

On 2017-11-14 23:16, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em novembro 14, 2017 19:26 Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general escreveu: >> - Replying on arch-general as don't have access on dev-public - >> > > Please, don't do this. Even though we always welcome input from our > users, there's > a reason

Re: [arch-general] JOB | Permanent Database Engineer (the Netherlands or remote)

On 2017-09-04 16:11, D C via arch-general wrote: > You don't have to be such a dick about it, Florian. One more message like this and I will be a dick too, Dorian.

Re: [arch-general] pacman doesn't show download progress

On 2017-08-16 20:41, SET wrote: > Le mercredi 16 août 2017 17:09:11 CEST Darshit Shah via arch-general a écrit : >> My guess is that there exist some mirror(s) that return a bad HTTP >> Response, that is a response without a file-size. > > You're probably right. pacman has expected output if I

Re: [arch-general] New - systemd 234 - luks partition fails to ask for password - workaround

On 2017-07-17 06:38, SanskritFritz via arch-general wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> I have a work around which is to add timeout=90 >> > > Where to add this? > To the kernel parameters, with luks.options= key.

Re: [arch-general] nginx package compiled on testing?

cman=0cd22d4454e0e1b3ae589b95274f808001465c15 > > Is this allowed? I, the undersigned, do hereby allow rebuilding packages against repository other than the target one if such recommendation has been given in the todo description. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

Re: [arch-general] Changing compilation flags

On 2017-07-12 18:25, Jordan Glover via arch-general wrote: > I testes some rebuilded binaries and BINDNOW isn't always enabled: > checksec -f /usr/bin/unrar > RELRO > Partial RELRO > checksec -f /usr/bin/qml (qt5-declarative) > RELRO > Partial RELRO > I don't know if -fno-plt was correctly passed

Re: [arch-general] libevent outdated for 5 month

On 06/06/2017 06:10 PM, Konstantin Shalygin via arch-general wrote: > Hello. > > I found that libevent > is outdated > from 2017-01-28. > The new stable is available >

Re: [arch-general] [Classroom] The Beginner's Guide to Arch Linux package management

On 2017-05-29 21:30, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > and (apparently) referring to himself in third-person. You are a party pooper, I can't even nitpick on this now. :(

Re: [arch-general] [DRAFT] Deprecation of the ABS tool and rsync server

> abs certainly was a bit part of the Arch KISS philosophy, with a single > command mirroring the build system to /var. Was darn convenient to... Hard to > see how the 84M (uncompressed) it requires was that big of a cost issue, but I > guess it adds up. You can simply clone svn2git mirrors, as

Re: [arch-general] Segmentation fault and (possibly) file system bug while removing gnome-extra

On 2017-05-17 15:35, Robert W0ng via arch-general wrote: > It would be my honor to do it if they accept image file :( > > OMG!? One pass is not enough!? Oh, look at the SILLY thing I've done!! > > BTW, switched to BTRFS last night. It seemed that the new file system agrees > more

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Test repository with gcc7

On 2017-05-12 03:22, Hao Zhang via arch-general wrote: > On 2017-05-10 20:19, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >> I found some time today to make a test build of the latest GCC. I tested >> some "simple" projects like nginx and libtorrent-rasterbar and they do >> build,

Re: [arch-general] [DRAFT] Deprecation of the ABS tool and rsync server

For some reason I sent this to arch-dev-public instead, sending again here… On 2017-05-10 04:27, Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes via arch-general wrote: > You should clarify if this affect user cloning the servers repos by > rsync to set they non-tiered local repos (*.pkg.tag.xzs) or just the >

Re: [arch-general] [Questions] Questions from past project and ideas fomr -dev-public that get silence.

On 2017-04-30 09:43, Pablo Roberto Lezaeta Reyes via arch-general wrote: > During this and the end of previous year some ideas and projects were > started to adress some problems, but most of them get now silence and > nothing more. > I'm talking about > > * ABS deprecation draft, Will be one or

Re: [arch-general] Suppressing specific pacman warnings

On 2017-04-05 10:44, SanskritFritz via arch-general wrote: > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:02 AM, João Miguel via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> A 2017-04-04T10:08:42 +0200, Guus Snijders via arch-general escreveu: >>> (...) >>> >>> I think Ely Swartz gave the best option;

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] Deprecate ABS?

On 2017-03-27 02:50, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > If we are deprecating ABS (which is yay!) then can we get a stable > release of asp in [extra] to replace it? That's what we (as in: falconindy) are going to do if ABS gets deprecated. > Also would be nice to have an official stance on

Re: [arch-general] What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

On 2017-03-21 11:47, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Many Go tools have fairly generic names. Aren't you afraid of a (possibly > future) > naming conflicts by placing them all in /usr/bin/? > > -- > Pierre Neidhardt > We can detect this, we have the technology… So until that happens, I will rest

Re: [arch-general] What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

On 2017-03-21 11:14, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2017-03-08 17:13, Iru Cai via arch-general wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm not familiar with go, but I'm trying to use some go programs, caddy for >> example. I read the PKGBUILD of it. It first use `go get' to get the

Re: [arch-general] What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

On 2017-03-08 17:13, Iru Cai via arch-general wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not familiar with go, but I'm trying to use some go programs, caddy for > example. I read the PKGBUILD of it. It first use `go get' to get the > dependencies and then do the `go build'. Yes, that's a bad practice, and the fact

Re: [arch-general] Firefox 52 Audio broken

On 2017-03-07 10:26, jjgaris via arch-general wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:00:12PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >> On 07/03/17 18:29, jjgaris via arch-general wrote: >>> Since the update to firefox 52 the audio support has been broken. >>> This seems to be because pulse audio is now a

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

On 2017-03-07 09:36, fnodeuser wrote: > why are you talking on her behalf? why did she send a message to you instead > of one to the ML? > why is she not answering any questions in this ML? Why do you keep breaking threads on our mailing lists? Why you are incapable of using one e-mail address?

Re: [arch-general] ABI Navigator — a project to search for binary symbols

On 2017-02-24 03:55, Andrey Ponomarenko via arch-general wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to present a new project called "ABI Navigator" to search for binary > symbols (functions, methods, global data, etc.) in open-source libraries: > https://abi-laboratory.pro/index.php?view=navigator > > The

Re: [arch-general] Weird reaction to pull request over at Arch Linux ARM

On 2017-01-27 19:27, Christopher Reimer wrote: > Therefore I think behavior like this could hurt the overall reputation > of Arch Linux. Especially if a future goal of Arch Linux might be ARM > support and Kevin Mihelich somehow joins the team. Even if, it is an independent project and Kevin has

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux

On 2013-09-13 01:14, Bruno Delbono wrote: PS - I'm also planning to create an image ready for deployment for use with Windows Azure -- they don't have any Arch images so far. Actually, I'm already working on it – it will be available in VM Depot in 3-4 days. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http

[arch-general] Initramfs doesn't ask for password to encrypted LVM

correct to me. Any ideas? [1] https://paste.xinu.at/pbiA78/ -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/

Re: [arch-general] Disabled asm in x264 on i686

, possibly in mplayer too. I wanted to avoid text relocation in library, but apparently I broke more than I fixed. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[arch-general] fish 2.0.0b2 in [community-testing]

/ -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] Arch as a web server

. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] dmenu 4.5

. dmenu 4.5-2 uses the xft patch https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/dmenuid=b51cf164641b8ea4bd1c7d788ff5ab40bb2d22a5 And it will be reverted to the end of the week. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/

Re: [arch-general] dmenu 4.5

On 04/17/2012 05:17 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: 2012/4/17 Bartłomiej Piotrowski b...@bpiotrowski.pl: On 04/17/2012 05:13 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com wrote: After updating dmenu to 4.5 yesterday, it does not honour my

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

that the entirety of the vim ecosystem in Arch could potentially be moved to [community] (except for archboot). They're not on the list. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] plugins for zathura

Then open ticket on our bugtracker - maybe someday Sergej will check assigned bugs and consider your request. ;) -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

On 02/24/2012 04:19 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: * If a TU wants to maintain an orphan that is currently in [extra], please let us know. Then if you could move following packages to [community], I'd be glad to take them: * gftp * midori * orage * ristretto * pwgen * vsftpd -- Bartłomiej

Re: [arch-general] Bugreport: nvidia-rt and /lib/modules

Better post it in the comments section of nvidia-rt in AUR (or link to your message). We're not providing support for AUR packages. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] Just thinking out loud...

On 01/08/2012 05:53 PM, Clive Cooper wrote: ... I wonder how much work would be involved in compiling ArchLinux to run on a Raspberry PI? Clive http://archlinuxarm.org/ -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital