Re: [arch-general] How to have multiple JDKs parallel?

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:48 PM Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > > On 9/17/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > > > So essentially what you really want is a way for pacman to remember your > > choice. That would require pacman modify its configuration which is > > something that

Re: [arch-general] Orca, java-atk-wrapper, and OpenJDK8

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume ALAUX <guilla...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Hunter Jozwiak via arch-general > <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I am trying to get java-atk-wrapper and OpenJD

Re: [arch-general] Orca, java-atk-wrapper, and OpenJDK8

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Hunter Jozwiak via arch-general wrote: > Greetings, > > I am trying to get java-atk-wrapper and OpenJDK8 working together with > the Orca screenreader. I have noticed that the following files exist in > OpenJDK7 but not for my default

Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Guillaume ALAUX <guilla...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kyle Laker <k...@kylelaker.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since >> 2016-09-

Re: [arch-general] OpenJFX package out-of-date

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Kyle Laker wrote: > > Hello, > > The extra/java-openjfx package has been flagged out-of-date since > 2016-09-13 and is stuck at verison 8u76-b03. This can result in > runtime warnings for some JavaFX applications whose FXML was created >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] todo list for moving http -> https sources

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Levente Polyak wrote: > > On 10/31/2016 04:03 PM, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote: > > As a middle ground, I think it would be more reasonable (or at least, > > less unreasonable) to modify makepkg to allow signing PKGBUILDs, or at > >

Re: [arch-general] What's with Ray Rashif?

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:59 PM, wrote: > Hey guys! > > I'm not writing this mail to complain, I'm just wondering! I use ardour > quite a lot and of course I wanted the update to version 5 as soon as > possible. The first release 5.0 didn't build here, so I thought ok, maybe >

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Bennett Piater wrote: > Oh, that looks promising. I'll read through those issues tomorrow. > Thank you! :) > > Cheers, > Bennett > > On 09/11/2016 09:08 PM, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >> Oh, this stuff might all be related to the

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:51:03 +0200, Bennett Piater wrote: > >> No freeze since the one I told you about! I will definitely > >> investigate further if/when I get a new one. > > > >Very weird... > >I had another one

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Bennett Piater wrote: >> Comparing your pacman.log with mine (mine taken from 2016-08-23 to >> 2016-09-05), here is the list of common packages we both have either >> installed or upgraded: >> >> - man-db >> - mariadb >> - mariadb-clients >> -

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:32:40 +0200, Bennett Piater wrote: >>> Regarding >>> >>> https://www.google.de/?gws_rd=ssl#q=+linux+no+.xsession-errors >>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=143068 >>>

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Bennett Piater wrote: > Hi all, > I've had a very elusive and frustrating problem this week and don't know > where to look anymore. > Maybe one of you has an idea? :) > > Since 2016-09-04, i3wm freezes every once and a while; often after >

Re: [arch-general] Network issue with broadcom-wl-dkms

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Thomas AUREL wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I have some issues with my wireless. It is capable to connect to a network > (with a static IP address) but when i launch a application which network, my > laptop froze. > > The last driver version

Re: [arch-general] [Q] Package all sources in openjdk8-src as Fedora does

, \ ZIP := $(IMAGES_OUTPUTDIR)/src.zip, \ EXTRA_DEPS := $(LAUNCHER_ZIP_SRC))) вт, 21 июля 2015 г. в 11:09, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@archlinux.org: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Konstantin Gribov gros...@gmail.com wrote: As I saw in fedora openjdk rpm, they bundle non-public java

Re: [arch-general] [Q] Package all sources in openjdk8-src as Fedora does

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Konstantin Gribov gros...@gmail.com wrote: As I saw in fedora openjdk rpm, they bundle non-public java sources (like packages in sun, jdk etc). It's quite useful for debugging when low-level jdk parts involved, so I propose this patch (based on java8-openjdk

Re: [arch-general] out of date accessibility package, liblouis

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 1:42 AM, kendell clark coffeekin...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 hi all I'm writing in to let everyone know that according to packages.archlinux.org, liblouis has been flagged out of date since september of last year. The url and

Re: [arch-general] out of date accessibility package, liblouis

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:59 PM, kendell clark coffeekin...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 1:42 AM, kendell clark coffeekin...@gmail.com wrote: hi all I'm writing in to let everyone know that according

Re: [arch-general] traceroute package

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:37 PM, schaefe...@lekkerleben.de wrote: Hello, We've found a inconsistency with the traceroute installation and it's manpage. The manpage says 'traceroute6 is an equivalent to traceroute -6',

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines for apps requiring a specific Java version

On 5 October 2014 02:09, Maxwell Anselm silverhammer...@gmail.com wrote: What is the name/URL of this app? It's the GURPS character sheet: http://gurpscharactersheet.com/ I have a github repo for my WIP AUR package: https://github.com/silverhammermba/gcs If building on a box where

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines for apps requiring a specific Java version

On 2 October 2014 18:41, Maxwell Anselm silverhammer...@gmail.com wrote: I'm working on a PKGBUILD for a Java app that must be built and run using Java 8, but I couldn't find any guidelines on best practices for such a situation. The easy part is including 'java-environment=8' and

Re: [arch-general] java: cannot execute - too many levels of symbolic links

On 9 September 2014 12:25, lolilolicon loliloli...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@archlinux.org wrote: Hello, Guillaume here (packager of that piece of crap java-common). Yes it is pretty crappy. symlinks created by the jre* packages

Re: [arch-general] java: cannot execute - too many levels of symbolic links

On 9 September 2014 09:15, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote: Hi List, after updating yesterday java does not work anymore for me: , | [tj@arch ~]$ LC_ALL=C java --help | /usr/bin/java: line 2:

Re: [arch-general] java: cannot execute - too many levels of symbolic links

On 9 September 2014 10:50, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote: Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@archlinux.org writes: Hello, Guillaume here (packager of that piece of crap java-common). I did not say that ... This issue and its fix were already reported here [0] and discussed on the forum

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 5 June 2014 02:02, Boyan Ding stu_...@126.com wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 23:20 +0200, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On 2 June 2014 03:21, Boyan Ding stu_...@126.com wrote: Hi Guillaume, I really appreciate your work, but are the versioning of the openjdk8* packages correct? They should

Re: [arch-general] NotMuch man pages

On 16 June 2014 14:48, luc.li...@mailoo.org wrote: Hello every one, I use notmuch to handle my mails, but I recently discovered that the man pages aren't present in the notmuch package and there isn't any notmuch-man package. Is that a decision or should I report a bug ? Eventually should I

Re: [arch-general] Question on version numbers

On 15 June 2014 14:30, Stefan Tatschner rumpels...@sevenbyte.org wrote: Hi, just because I'm inquisitive. What's the purpose of version numbers with a colon? I've seen this in several packages, e.g. this one [1]. Upstream version number is 5.0.2 and arch version number is 1:5.0.2. Regards,

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 2 June 2014 03:21, Boyan Ding stu_...@126.com wrote: Hi Guillaume, I really appreciate your work, but are the versioning of the openjdk8* packages correct? They should be 8.u0_b132 or simply 8.u0 instead of 8.u132... By the way I also made a PKGBUILD [1] based on yours and it's currently

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 29 March 2014 01:02, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@archlinux.org wrote: On 28 March 2014 18:30, Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: I'm just wondering what the plan is, if any, for getting java 8 packages into arch? -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com Calendar

Re: [arch-general] Broken mirror

On 16 May 2014 13:54, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@barrera.io wrote: $ ping6 archlinux.c3sl.ufpr.br Google reveals ufpr.br is the UFPR - Universidade Federal do Paraná. Their website isn't reachable, so your contact - from

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 29 March 2014 01:02, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@archlinux.org wrote: On 28 March 2014 18:30, Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: I'm just wondering what the plan is, if any, for getting java 8 packages into arch? -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com Calendar: https

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 30 March 2014 19:47, Javier Vasquez j.e.vasque...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@archlinux.org wrote: On 28 March 2014 18:30, Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: I'm just wondering what the plan is, if any, for getting java 8 packages

Re: [arch-general] Java 8

On 28 March 2014 18:30, Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: I'm just wondering what the plan is, if any, for getting java 8 packages into arch? -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com Calendar:

Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

On 10 June 2012 20:40, Kwpolska kwpol...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote: On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote: I'm wondering, what amount

Re: [arch-general] view command

On 8 May 2012 18:27, Tiago Sousa tsous...@gmail.com wrote: Hey. I don't have that behavior here but i guess if you set the environment EDITOR variable to vim it should work. On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:31 PM, G. Schlisio g.schli...@gmx.de wrote: hi all, i stumbled over view being a link to

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages

On 5 March 2012 21:23, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:49:57PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: * bluez-firmware I take this one. Thanks! * lzo If nothing

Re: [arch-general] How to find if a file belongs to a installed package?

On 20 November 2011 12:02, Hector Martinez-Seara hse...@gmail.com wrote: Why I'm so blind, Thanks On 20 November 2011 12:48, Jakob Gruber jakob.gru...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/20/2011 11:44 AM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: Hi, I have been looking but I haven't found a solution to check if

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3 Always in Fallback Mode

On 23 August 2011 09:48, Max Xie max.t@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Sorry for my bad English. I've just bought a new computer about 1 month ago and I tried to install archlinux as second OS on it yesterday. But when I got everything done and started the Gnome, it took a minute and, started in

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3 Always in Fallback Mode

supports 3d hardware acceleration (of course out of Gnome)? Mail by Max Xie On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@archlinux.orgwrote: On 23 August 2011 09:48, Max Xie max.t@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Sorry for my bad English. I've just bought a new computer

Re: [arch-general] pacdiff / pacdiffviewer doesn't notice change in kdmrc

On 13 April 2011 18:03, Marek Otahal markota...@gmail.com wrote: hi, by chance I realised that the pacdiff(viewer) utils don't notice a change in kdmrc file. This is strange as I remember being notified about the modification on almost every kde update. By creating a /etc/rc.conf.pacnew I

Re: [arch-general] How to stop everything.log spamming ?

On 5 March 2011 06:15, fredbezies fredbez...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. I'm facing bug 22690 and /var/log/everything.log get spammed every 5 seconds. Any tricks to stop this spam ? Or do I have to wait to see it get fixed ? Thanks for your info and tips. Have a good day. -- Frederic

Re: [arch-general] GPG signature (was: GPT slower than MBR, although both are properly aligned?)

On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 09:03 +0100, Frank Thieme wrote: Hi! Maybe it's just me, but all your messages in this thread have a bad signature... Bye...Frank Hello, I imported both Karol's signature and yours and Evo says the signature is valid. It just complains as I haven't signed nor set

Re: [arch-general] Package building - Change name of finished package

On 3 January 2011 16:52, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:17:46 am Ray Rashif wrote: On 3 January 2011 23:29, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: joomla-1.5.22-1-any-sitename.pkg.tar.xz Is this possible? No.

Re: [arch-general] Package building - Change name of finished package

On 3 January 2011 17:08, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:38:52 am Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On 3 January 2011 16:52, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: On Monday, January 03, 2011 11:17:46 am Ray Rashif wrote: On 3 January 2011 23:29, Baho Utot

Re: [arch-general] Wireshark 1.4.2 stops capturing packets

On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:07 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: On 21/11/10 14:08, mwnn wrote: Hi all, After capturing a random number of packets, the new wireshark-1.4.2 stops capturing packets. Bug reports work best going to the bug tracker and supplying more details. Allan This is an

Re: [arch-general] package xboard long outdated, new pkgbuild attached

On 5 November 2010 03:21, Auguste Pop augu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The xboard package in extra has been long outdated and orphaned. I have attached my own PKGBUILD which includes an .desktop file to ease the use. Can any maintainer just update it? Thank you for your kind attention.

Re: [arch-general] Question about pacman and installing Gnome

On 4 October 2010 17:15, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote: Hi all, I had to do a reinstall of my machine so I did that and for some reason, Gnome doesn't start proprely. I am visually impaired so I can't see the screen until I have logged into Gnome and started Orca, the screen reader

Re: [arch-general] Question about pacman and installing Gnome

On 4 October 2010 18:35, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote: Hello, On 2010-10-04 at 17:34 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On 4 October 2010 17:15, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote: Hi all, I had to do a reinstall of my machine so I did that and for some reason, Gnome doesn't start

Re: [arch-general] Question about pacman and installing Gnome

On 4 October 2010 18:37, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote: Hi, On 2010-10-04 at 18:29 Jan de Groot wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:15 +0200, Christian wrote: I wait for about 30 seconds before I login as my user but nothing happens when I press enter after I have entered my password.

Re: [arch-general] Question about pacman and installing Gnome

On 4 October 2010 18:47, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote: Hi, On 2010-10-04 at 18:42 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On 4 October 2010 18:37, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote: Hi, On 2010-10-04 at 18:29 Jan de Groot wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:15 +0200, Christian wrote: I wait

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] abs-2.4.0-1

On 3 October 2010 05:12, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 02/10/10 21:19, Mike Sampson wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org  wrote: On 02/10/10 19:29, Mike Sampson wrote: [snip] Slightly off topic. I always wondered why there wasn't a Python proto

Re: [arch-general] Problem with keyboard in Gnome

On 3 October 2010 17:57, Christian christia...@runbox.com wrote: Hi again, On 2010-10-02 at 00:56 Ulf Winkelvos wrote: On 02.10.2010 00:42, Christian wrote: Hi, On 2010-10-02 at 00:24 Jan Steffens wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Christianchristia...@runbox.com wrote: Hi all, I

Re: [arch-general] Intel GMA 3150 Graphics Card driver

2010/9/23 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Adamzyg adam...@gmail.com wrote: thank you. if I max the glxgears window, it only ouput like below: *118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 23.560 FPS* *137 frames in 5.0 seconds = 27.220 FPS* *139 frames in 5.0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta_174_g41bc-1

On 9 September 2010 13:02, Florian Pritz bluew...@server-speed.net wrote: On 09.09.2010 11:55, Pierre Schmitz wrote: this will hopefully the last update of xz for some time. :-) Maybe this is a sign for the final 5.0 version to be near. I am now using the (very strange) upstream versioning

Re: [arch-general] wireshark 1.4.0-2 crashes

On 6 September 2010 17:25, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 09/06/2010 06:15 PM, mwnn wrote: Hi, I am running the x86 version of Arch. The recently updated wireshark segfaults on my machine. Here is the backtrace of the core file generated by gdb. (gdb) bt #0 0xb4e3731f in

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta-7

On 6 September 2010 19:57, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: So, here is another xz release. The upstream change from pkgrel=6 that actually changes relevant code among some translation fixes is xz: Use an array instead of pointer for stdin_filename. Please sign off, Pierre --

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] dbus-core 1.2.24-2

On 6 September 2010 19:35, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 06.09.2010 14:09, schrieb Jan de Groot: Please signoff for both architectures. This release should fix the threading issues that crashes KDE a lot. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20604 Looking good so far, although I

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.7.4.p3-1

On 5 September 2010 15:25, Florian Pritz bluew...@server-speed.net wrote: On 05.09.2010 15:30, Allan McRae wrote: On 22/08/10 17:46, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 08/22/2010 07:39 AM, Allan McRae wrote: Upstream bug fix release. Signoff both, Allan signoff x86_64 Any chance of an i686? i686

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

Mandriva Cooker is like debian sid that's the unstable branch from which they freeze to stable ones. On 29 July 2010 16:36, Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: how embarrassing. I guess cooker is like

Re: [arch-general] community/jre and community/jdk packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

On 25 July 2010 19:02, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@alaux.net wrote: On 25 July 2010 18:45, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 07:37 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On 25 July 2010 18:17, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 07:14 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: Hi

Re: [arch-general] community/jre and community/jdk packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

On 25 July 2010 18:45, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 07:37 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On 25 July 2010 18:17, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 07:14 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: Hi, On Sunday 25 Jul 2010 at 16:50 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: I also have

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

On 17 June 2010 01:34, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 17/06/10 00:48, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: Are the python scripts in the pacbuild package (apple, strawberry, queuepackage, waka and uploadpackage) used any more as described in this pagehttp://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacbuild

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Out-of-date packages in [extra]/[community]

2010/6/17 Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.com.ve - biopython - pylint - python-cheetah - python-formencode - python-sqlobject (needed by pacbuild, but does pacbuild still work?!) - python-gdata (needed by pytube in [community]) - python-vpython Let me have the python ones (mainly

Re: [arch-general] Package fwbuilder flagged out-of-date

On 16 June 2010 22:49, Ionuț Bîru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/16/2010 11:47 PM, Gaurish Sharma wrote: Hi, The fwbuilder package which is very usefull for writing firewall rules is flagged out of date since weeks. there is a major 4 which has lots of new features[1] Any reason its

Re: [arch-general] Package fwbuilder flagged out-of-date

Which architecture your are building on? On 17 June 2010 21:50, Gaurish Sharma cont...@gaurishsharma.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Ionuț Bîru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote: first compile and install libfwbuilder and then compile fwbuilder against the new libfwbuilder. the

Re: [arch-general] Package fwbuilder flagged out-of-date

Sweet ! Well done Andreas. Could we see the sources plz? I'm curious ! On 17 June 2010 22:04, Gaurish Sharma cont...@gaurishsharma.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: Hi, please try these packages and report any issue. If you say that

Re: [arch-general] Package fwbuilder flagged out-of-date

On 17 June 2010 22:24, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: On Thursday 17 June 2010 22:07:31 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: Sweet ! Well done Andreas. Could we see the sources plz? I'm curious ! Of curse. http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/libfwbuilder/trunk/ http

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

On 16 June 2010 02:23, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Just to clarify the build process that goes on here: 1) make a clean chroot (mkarchroot - only needs done once) 2) build package in chroot (makechrootpkg) 3) upload package to staging area and commit to svn (e.g. testingpkg) 4)

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

How exactly is core and extra database populated? Moreover, instead of building all packages in the private PCs of developers Packages are not build on developers computers but on build machines as explained here http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacbuild

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

On 15 June 2010 16:46, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@alaux.net wrote: How exactly is core and extra database populated? Moreover, instead of building all packages in the private PCs of developers Packages are not build

Re: [arch-general] Package signing for the umpteenth time (was Re: unrealircd 3.2.8.1-2 contains backdoor)

On 15 June 2010 16:55, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote: Moreover, instead of building all packages in the private PCs of developers, I think it is

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Namcap release coming soon

: Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@alaux.net Date: Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Namcap release coming soon To: dpmc...@gmail.com Hi Dan, Didn't really how to answer your mail as I don't have write access to the list so I'm just answering directly to you

Re: [arch-general] Converting to 64

Hum... this technique looks like reinstalling to me. You don't *convert*anything but *reinstall* packages. So to my point of view you would be better off installing from scratch. Much cleaner. You will still have to download 64bits packages. Still you can keep the list of installed packages with

Re: [arch-general] extra/tomcat is out of date

My pleasure ! On 26 May 2010 22:31, Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/26/2010 01:12 AM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: Hi, Tested on my x64 (and changed the pkgrel that was wrong): that works. So... anyone interested in this up-to-date version of a masterpiece of the Java world

Re: [arch-general] extra/tomcat is out of date

Hi, Tested on my x64 (and changed the pkgrel that was wrong): that works. So... anyone interested in this up-to-date version of a masterpiece of the Java world? :) Guillaume On 20 May 2010 12:11, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@alaux.net wrote: Hi everyone, A new version of Tomcat 5 was released

[arch-general] extra/tomcat is out of date

is the up-to-date PKGBUILD. Cheers, Guillaume ALAUX PKGBUILD Description: Binary data

[arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date - new version

Hi everyone, As stated by mrbrich in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0). I made this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it. Could anyone using it give it a try please? Thanks Guillaume ALAUX [1] http

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date - new version

OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did for v1.99? On 10 May 2010 15:50, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 10.05.2010 15:13, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX: Hi everyone

Re: [arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date - new version

on the AUR page to explain that this pkg requires testing and feedback. I will also get the wiki page up to date to reflect this repo change if you confirm you deleted it. Thanks. Guillaume ALAUX On 10 May 2010 16:01, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Guillaume