Re: [arch-general] Update to Boost Libraries

Hi, The package has been market out of date for quite some time now (almost 4 months) [0]. One release has now actually been skipped (1.73). -- Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io [0] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/boost/

[arch-general] Update to Boost Libraries

Is there a reason why boost libraries are stuck to version 1.72 when 1.74 are already available? I cannot find anything on the bug tracker. Thank you. -- Best Jayesh Badwaik

Re: [arch-general] Test Message for DMARC Checking (Please Ignore)

Thank you. On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:09 PM Florian Pritz wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:41:54PM +0100, Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general > wrote: > > Test Message > > If you just want to test if your DMARC verifier works, there are a few > possibilities listed he

[arch-general] Test Message for DMARC Checking (Please Ignore)

Test Message -- Best Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-general] List of Files Created by makepkg

Yes, I meant the files inside the package. Thanks for the correction. I thought there might be a tool like `pacman -Ql`. Turns out, I was missing the `-p` option there. Thank you. -- Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

[arch-general] List of Files Created by makepkg

Hi, I am trying to write an automated script which takes in packages and package files created by makepkg and uploads it somewhere. For this, I would need the list of files created by the `makepkg` command. Is there a way to get that? -- Best Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io

Re: [arch-general] Static Lib Build for SDL2

Hmm, sorry for the noise. You can safely ignore the mail. The problem was caused by incompatible configuration in other operating systems, not ArchLinux. -- Cheers Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-general] Static Lib Build for SDL2

Fixed the link: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/sdl2#n50 -- Jayesh Badwaik https://jayeshbadwaik.github.io signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-general] Static Lib Build for SDL2

Hi, As I currently notice here (line 32) https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD? h=packages/sdl2#n31 The SDL2 library is not build with a static component. This is useful for a lot of development and hence, it would be nice if it is build with static component.

Re: [arch-general] Reboot-less Computers

On Sunday, 28 October 2018 21:17:31 CET Jelle van der Waa wrote: > The wiki has an article about kpatch, but note that you will have to > maintain your own kernel then. Also kpatch is really geared to updating > your kernel for security issues and not updating to a newer version. [1] > > [1]

[arch-general] Reboot-less Computers

Hi, I am looking at possibilities to have a setup which does not need to be restarted at all and can be live patched. I have seen this old post: http://allanmcrae.com/2015/03/updating-arch-kernel-on-digital-ocean/ And I am reading information about kpatch. But there does not need to be much

Re: [arch-general] Include paths for python 3

I finally got around to editing my code, and I realized how bad my request was. Thank you for suggesting the good alternative. :-)

[arch-general] Include paths for python 3

I've noticed that the include paths for python 3 are updated according to the version of python being installed. This removes some stability for custom programs which build against python (example boost.python). It would be nice if there was a symlink version of python include paths to a stable