Re: [arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base`, package - manual intervention required

2019-10-11 Thread John Crist via arch-general
to proceed in the future. So again, thank you. On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 8:28 PM Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em outubro 10, 2019 17:06 John Crist via arch-general escreveu: > > I've submitted `base-extras` to the AUR at > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/base-extras/ that contains

[arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base`, package - manual intervention required

2019-10-10 Thread John Crist via arch-general
I've submitted `base-extras` to the AUR at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/base-extras/ that contains the missing packages from `base` if someone REALLY wants it.

Re: [arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base` package - manual intervention required

2019-10-09 Thread John Crist via arch-general
Sounds good to me - do you have a suggested list of packages for base-extras or at least the list of what was pulled from the old base. Here's a diff of what was in the `base` group vs what is now in the `base` metapackage: $ comm -23 <(pacman -Sgq base | sort) <(expac -S "%D" base | tr -s