Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

2016-09-01 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: Yep that's my expectation. There were several times, that a new version with important fixes (fix for YouTube downloading, etc.) was released, and lots of people came to our issue tracker for "broken" YouTube downloading because the Arch

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

2016-09-01 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
On 01/09/16 18:54, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote: I'll need to review the PKGBUILD beforehand or write my own. This should be done for *ALL* AUR builds actually. You should always be aware of what you are running on your machine, especially if that involves sudo rights. Cheers, Kwang

Re: [arch-general] Laptop cooling fan does not work

2016-08-26 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
On 26/08/16 19:06, Dragon ryu via arch-general wrote: As in desktop pc, around 70-80 degree is considered 'not too high'. But in note pc, it's too high. My mac book pro heats easily up to 80 degrees when on lot of load. It even reaches 100 and throttles when boosting is enabled. 70-80 under

Re: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell?

2016-08-19 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
On 08/19/2016 05:16 PM, Jayesh Badwaik wrote: systemd is GPL and not patented by Red Hat (I won't be surprised if it does potentially probably violates some patents somewhere on the earth anyway), Chromium is BSD, MIT etc. I can't help pointing out that PowerShell is MIT. Cheers, Kwang

Re: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell?

2016-08-19 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
On 08/19/2016 05:08 PM, Lee Fuller via arch-general wrote: Microsoft have set a precedent of unnecessary vile arrogance towards Linux and the companies you cite here don't. I think that is fundamentally why most people have responded with scepticism. For me, defining something *good* and *bad*

Re: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell?

2016-08-19 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
On 08/19/2016 07:20 AM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general wrote: Shipping PowerShell to linux will be a total disaster. Why would it be a disaster? One more option for Linux that is totally up to the user's freedom to choose. I would personally never use it, but it's nice that now I can

Re: [arch-general] Emacs package is too stable?

2016-08-12 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
Hello Josiah, 08/12/2016 04:12 PM, Josiah Schwab wrote: There is also emacs-pretest in AUR, which follows the pretest/rc versions (so presently, emacs 25.1-rc1). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-pretest/ This gets the source from a tarball, not the git repo, so you don't have to

Re: [arch-general] Emacs package is too stable?

2016-08-12 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
. Cheers Bastian On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org <mailto:arch-general@archlinux.org>> wrote: Hello, I recently started using arch linux and the official package for emacs is a bit outdated compared to the one p

[arch-general] Emacs package is too stable?

2016-08-12 Thread Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
Hello, I recently started using arch linux and the official package for emacs is a bit outdated compared to the one provided from Fedora, which is where I come from. I understand that the `emacs` package is intended for stable only, so I didn't mark it as outdated. However, current dev