Re: [arch-general] Groups and GIDs in PKGBUILDs

2012-05-31 Thread Seblu
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's a bit more complex than that because groups are stored in archives by their GID, not their name. AFAIK makepkg doesn't call bsdtar with numeric-owner. You can check user/group are also stored in package

Re: [arch-general] drop slim in favor of lightdm

2012-05-08 Thread Seblu
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote: Any thoughts on that? I was interested by your suggestion as slim user since 2 years. Consolekit integration (and my ugly workaround) is my only issue with it. So i took the time to test this light login manager, and my

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 19.04.2012 01:21, schrieb Seblu: As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. If you move linux-tools source package into core

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-18 Thread Seblu
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Apr 18, 2012 10:41 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 08.04.2012 18:08, schrieb Leonid Isaev: Hi,       Cpufrequtils 008 in [core] has long been orphaned and, as you know, actually deprecated upstream

Re: [arch-general] pacman ignore packages by pattern?

2012-03-19 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 19/03/12 18:43, XeCycle wrote: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org writes: allan@mugen ~ pacman -Su --ignore libreoffic* :: Starting full system upgrade... warning: libreoffice-calc: ignoring package upgrade (3.5.0-2 =

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] ChangeLog usage ..

2012-01-13 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:49:39AM -0300, Angel Velásquez wrote: I'm all for writing useful (and detailed, if necessary) commit messages instead of writing ChangeLog entries. We use a VCS for some reason. Using

[arch-general] PyconFR

2011-09-13 Thread Seblu
Hello, Will there be members of archlinux at French Pycon? http://www.pycon.fr/conference/edition2011 Cheers, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] btrfs Arch

2011-08-22 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa g...@atmarama.net wrote: Afaics, btrfs will soon get fsck tool for repairing the fs, but I wonder what's the plan for btrfs support in Arch, iow, when it can become 'official' ? BTRFS is already supported by initscripts:

Re: [arch-general] Creating an Arch chroot on a non-Arch system?

2011-07-23 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote: Is there something available out there that makes it easy to create an Arch chroot on a non-Arch system, e.g. Ubuntu or Fedora? Some times it more easy to create a local chroot with your arch, make a tarball, scp it and

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] dropping tcp_wrapper support

2011-07-16 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Vic Demuzere v...@demuzere.be wrote: On 16 July 2011 19:22, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: old hosts.allow: sshd: 192. ntfs: 192. iptables: -A INPUT -j REJECT -A INPUT -p tcp -s 192.168.0.0/24 --dport ssh -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -s

Re: [arch-general] Anybody else have problems with the new Nvidia drivers (275.09.07-1)

2011-06-17 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote: On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote: ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory! Are we sure ths is a bug with the nVidia driver? Can someone load that image who isn't using it? I

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] netcfg 2.5.5-1

2011-05-27 Thread Seblu
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote: On 2011/5/23 Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote: version 2.5.5 - new connection types: openvpn (FS#21490), vlan - new option HIDDEN (for hidden SSIDs) - new option SKIPNOCARRIER (FS#21755) - default

Re: [arch-general] rc.d bash completion

2011-05-18 Thread Seblu
right (git wise, haven't looked at the code). I have a patch about rc.d bash completion pending since 5 may... https://github.com/seblu/arch-initscripts/commit/ce18321029e746a0417c65762c6c23b7cfa22185 Tom can you pull my branch? -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg status

2011-05-15 Thread Seblu
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Stan iky...@gmx.com wrote: Hi guys. Wanna know about netcfg package status. In latest git there is very important variable - HIDDEN, which allows to connect to hidden networks without PRE_UP=iwconfig interface AP_NAME hack. How soon it'll be in repos? There

Re: [arch-general] /sbin/rc bug?

2011-05-03 Thread Seblu
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:58 PM, D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote: I might have discovered a bug with this new /sbin/rc thing. If I run /etc/rc.d/httpd start, Apache starts just fine. Yet if I do rc start httpd it fails with: :: Starting Apache Web Server [BUSY] (13)Permission

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread Seblu
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 01/05/11 15:35, Johannes Held wrote: On 01.05.2011 04:13, Ray Kohler

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-26 Thread Seblu
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in testing. Issue is still present today. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23919 Kind

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-26 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: Am Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0800 schrieb Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com: error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0

Re: [arch-general] Touchpad not recognized

2011-04-22 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Xianwen Chen xianwen.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Hugo, Thanks a lot! I tried it and and tried to log out and log in again, but xinput list doesn't change its output. :( Xianwen On 04/18/2011 07:37 PM, Hugo Yamashita wrote: Have you tried modprobe psmouse?

Re: [arch-general] Touchpad not recognized

2011-04-22 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Hugo Yamashita hugo.hid...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Xianwen Chen xianwen.c...@gmail.com wrote: I know you'll all hate me for saying this, but usually Ubuntu finds every

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] udev-167-1

2011-04-09 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Hi guys. udev 167 Bugfixes. The udev runtime data moved from /dev/.udev/ to /run/udev/. The /run mountpoint is supposed to be a tmpfs mounted during early boot, available and writable to for all tools at any

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] udev-167-1

2011-04-09 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Hi guys. udev 167 Bugfixes. The udev runtime data moved from /dev/.udev/ to /run/udev/. The /run mountpoint is supposed to be a tmpfs mounted during early boot, available and writable to for all tools at any

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-03-31 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - latest stable patches - disabled /dev/kmem - added AMD_IOMMU support - kernel

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-26 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: # Run helper every time a Bluetooth device appears # On remove actions, bluetoothd should go away by itself ACTION==add|change, SUBSYSTEM==bluetooth, RUN

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-23 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: Could you try replacing your bluetooth rules with: # Run helper every time a Bluetooth device appears # On remove actions, bluetoothd should go away by itself

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-22 Thread Seblu
2011/3/22 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com: Any particular reason you cross-posted this between aur-general and arch-general? I got screwed by the auto-completion On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 03:59 +0100, Seblu wrote: Hello, It was a few things I could not explain with bluez and udev. When my system

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-22 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: So, this situation is a bit confusing, so why do not remove /lib/udev/rules.d/97-bluetooth.rules? I don't think it is a good idea to remove these rules

[arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-21 Thread Seblu
Hello, It was a few things I could not explain with bluez and udev. When my system start killswitch off and i toggle killswitch after, bluetoothd is auto started. When my system starts with killswitch on, bluetoothd is not started. (a bit confusing) After adding hooks in rc, bluetoothd refuse

Re: [arch-general] Ghost / Daniel Griffiths packages in [community]

2011-02-15 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: Sadly Ghost resigned as TU, he has done a good job and I thank him again for all his hard work. But there are still much packages left in [community] which he owns, therefore I like to see these packages adopted or moved

Re: [arch-general] [testing] protocol - {WAS: [arch-dev-public] WARNING - glibc-2.13-2}

2011-02-07 Thread Seblu
2011/2/6 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org: On 06/02/11 20:16, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: I have removed the glibc-2.13-2 package until a fix is committed to upstream git.  All users should downgrade to the version in [core]. Allan While I

Re: [arch-general] [testing] protocol - {WAS: [arch-dev-public] WARNING - glibc-2.13-2}

2011-02-07 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/02/11 20:26, Seblu wrote: 2011/2/6 Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org: On 06/02/11 20:16, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: I have removed the glibc-2.13-2 package until a fix

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-31 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: [2011-01-31 08:40:37 +0100] Seblu: Hello, I dug up this old thread to know if someone find a suitable solution to use slim (or startx) + window manager working correctly with consolekit 0.4.1 ? I made a new package

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-31 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: [2011-01-31 09:50:35 +0100] Seblu: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: If you run i686, please let me know if this package solves your issues:        http://arch.vesath.org

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-31 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: [2011-01-31 09:50:35 +0100] Seblu: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: If you run i686, please let me know

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-31 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote: [2011-01-31 11:42:56 +0100] Seblu: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: Got it. The only difference is the line added in slim.pam? Because i made some test by manually adding this line

Re: [arch-general] [pam/consolekit] Help needed for desktop permission handling

2011-01-30 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 11/21/2010 04:55 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: Recent display managers (gdm, kdm and lxdm) can handle their own polkit/consolekit session through pam access. The gnome/xfce4-session packages only have basic access to

Re: [arch-general] Linux / mkinitcpio / vbox bug: bad swap file entry

2011-01-03 Thread Seblu
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote: any advice? You can try to run on phy host / kvm host / xen host be sure it's not a vbox / vm related issue. -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

2010-11-26 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote: I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no feedback on this. This either means it works well, or nobody uses it. It work perfectly for me on awesome with gnome-volume-control-applet. Thanks!