Re: [arch-general] Personal note

2012-08-18 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 07:27:29PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: Hi guys, As most devs have done already, I'm going to change my relationship with arch-general. This probably does not matter to most of you, so sorry for the noise. Then again, it might be a useful reminder about how most devs

Re: [arch-general] linux-api-headers in core is 3.1.5 while linux is 3.1.6

2012-01-05 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 01/05/2012 10:26 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Please, someone give me a cent for every time this question is asked. If I ever go to Germany, I'll buy you enough beers to last you through the night. :P

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] linux-3.0.6-1

2011-10-05 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 10/04/2011 09:19 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches Changes: - changed default governor to ondemand instead of performance - added ubifs support - reworked archlinux MTD session based on fedora # enable rico XD card reader support:

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] linux-3.0.3-1

2011-08-18 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 08/18/2011 12:12 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa Signoff x86_64.

Re: [arch-general] TeXLive 2011 pretest

2011-06-14 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 06/15/2011 05:03 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote: anyone got problems with texlive 2011 usage so far? No problem here so far. But I didn't test all of TeXLive packages, just the ones that I used.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-23 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 02/22/2011 08:41 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 02/22/2011 02:13 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 22.02.2011 12:35, schrieb Ionuț Bîru: Hi, The util-linux-ng project has been renamed back to util-linux. Why 2.19-3?

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] util-linux 2.19-3

2011-02-23 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 02/23/2011 07:31 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 17:43, Smith Dhumbumroongzodma...@gmail.com wrote: No sign off from me (x86_64). After I upgrade to the latest util-linux package from testing (version 2.19-3), I can no longer unmount FUSE file system because FUSE file system

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1

2010-08-16 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 08/17/2010 02:50 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: Good point on power consumption. I'll see if I can find powertop in AUR. The instrumentation on my laptop sucks - few sensors, but my best sensors are my hands. The CPU and GPU are located in the left side of my laptop and you can feel the temp

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel 2.6.35-2

2010-08-06 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 08/07/2010 01:05 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.35 series for both arches and give feedback if real issues arise. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges greetings tpowa I have been using kernel26 package version 2.6.35-2 for about a day now. No

Re: [arch-general] mandriva beat us to a new version

2010-07-29 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On 07/29/2010 09:36 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Caleb Cushingxenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: how embarrassing. I guess cooker is like their testing version... but according to this it's in opensuse 11.3... we're definitely starting to fall behind release

Re: [arch-general] mail client

2010-02-10 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:24:30AM -0500, andrew james wrote: i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert to vers 2 but why is the newer vers slow, laggy, semi-stallish? has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers 3? any switch values to cause it to work quicker?

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 and Radeon KMS

2009-12-13 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:03:53 +0100 Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Am Montag 07 Dezember 2009 schrieb Tom: So, any news on this? I 'fixed' it by removing radeon from initramfs, but as has been pointed out, thats not really a solution!? HI guys, This kms firmware issue revealed

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 and Radeon KMS

2009-12-08 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:33:12 +0100 Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote: On 08.12.2009 11:13, Xavier wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:52 AM, David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote: On Monday 07 December 2009 09:05:18 and regarding: I'm confirming this as

Re: [arch-general] [OT] What is wrong with DBus anyway?

2009-12-04 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:07:24 +0100 Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote: Arvid Picciani wrote: Sounds like either this discussion is worth discussing again. i forgot to add: or you're a rare exception, Jan. thanks for at least trying to see the point here, much aprechiated. i hope others

Re: [arch-general] xf86-input-evdev conflicts with xorg-server. Remove xorg-server?

2009-12-02 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:58:20 +0100 Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote: Jan de Groot wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote: nope. The hal crap has been added to X a while ago as optional (meaning X would just freeze without it, but at least pretend to start) ,

Re: [arch-general] аrch x86_64 and i686 performance comparison

2009-11-11 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:11:02 -0700 Sergey Manucharian serg...@rmico.com wrote: Hi folks, The similar question most probably has been discussed many times, but I really cannot find a clear answer. There are some obvious thinks like 64-bit addressing, but how about math calculations

Re: [arch-general] Virtualbox Window Transparent?? [solved - sort of]

2009-05-15 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
it self (I might be wrong, though). Regards, Smith Dhumbumroong

Re: [arch-general] Scim and arphic fonts update in [testing]

2009-03-01 Thread Smith Dhumbumroong
Thank you for taking your time and updating the scim packages, Eric. :) Any news on when it will hit 64bit? I'm currently using scim on my x86_64 Arch and would like to test the new packages out.