On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Alper Kanat tu...@raptiye.org wrote:
Hello,
As I wrote earlier, I don't have a mouse interface at all since I'm
accessing the Arch box via SSH on my Mac. I checked the entropy level via
cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_level and it was around 58 at most.
I mentioned that I consider tcp_wrappers to be a DAC, someone asked me to
clarify on MAC and DAC systems, so I put up a blog post:
http://red45.wordpress.com/2011/07/17/mac-and-dac-core-security-concepts/
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.orgwrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 01:56:58PM -0600, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
I mentioned that I consider tcp_wrappers to be a DAC, someone asked me to
clarify on MAC and DAC systems, so I put up a blog post:
http://red45
are constructed
and parsed it is an easy and manageable solution.
Thanks to the Arch devs for taking this out, this was the right move and I
will argue that it has made Arch more secure by not supporting outdated
security constructs.
-Thomas S Hatch
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.orgwrote:
Am 16.07.2011 23:00, schrieb Richard Ullger:
What do the devs intend to do with packages that depend on tcp_wrapper
such as syslog-ng, xinetd and esound which is a dependency of gstreamer?
Richard.
None of those
I would say the same, but a todo list isn't a to-done list, so keep
that in mind. He also pointed out that I got little to no feedback
when I asked about this both a year and six months ago, so
expectations are pretty low this time around. I'm sure if there were
serious objections people
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
contributor (and reviewer of
I also agree with this, but I wanted to avoid saying it lest we get into
another debate about systemd on here. But yes, systemd does seem to go
against
the grain of the UNIX Philosophy and the Arch Way.
I agree, no need to flame, we have flamed before on this :)
In the end, I trust the
.
The release announcement is here:
http://red45.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/salt-0-8-8/
Arch package is here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47512
Video explaining how to use Salt and what it is in detail is here:
http://blip.tv/thomas-s-hatch/salt-0-8-7-presentation-5180182
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 05/25/2011 05:20 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Hi there,
There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
going to be 3.0.
Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
modify
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:20:46 Bernardo Barros wrote:
Hi there,
There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
going to be 3.0.
Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have
for over 6 years
and NEVER had a problem with them. I would hate to see them leave because
some users did not know how to boot into an alternative runlevel.
-Thomas S Hatch
, but the quickest way to become a member of the Arch
developer community is to maintain packages in the AUR, kill some bugs on
the bugtracker, and submit patches to Arch projects. Then we will make you a
TU and you will be well on your way!
-Thomas S Hatch
-Arch Linux Trusted User
though
once I feel skilled enough to do so.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Brandon Jones magedevelop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Alright thanks. I'll look into how pkgbuild works and see if I can
figure
it out
Since we're in an educational mood ...
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
especially: http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.1
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.2
Greg
See? I still make a mess of things sometimes :)
-Thomas S Hatch
2011/5/1 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote:
What about create a association elsewhere in the world where it can be
less expensive?
In France, we have an association law 1901
be cheaper (most legal
business entities in the USA can be formed for less than $50) and most of
what 501(c)3 buys you is letting your donors declare the donation to be tax
exempt.
-Thomas S Hatch
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 01:48:04 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 21.04.2011 08:32, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:32 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:34
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Friday, April 08, 2011 14:29:34 Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:55:16 -0600
schrieb Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com:
Yaro makes many good points, I think that my recommendation would
be
to allow someone
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:01:04 Thomas S Hatch wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Friday, April 08, 2011 14:29:34 Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:55:16 -0600
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:54:23 Thomas S Hatch wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:01:04 Thomas S Hatch wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 23:16:46 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different way
without any further discussions. There's a need for installing one
cron
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 08/04/11 07:16, Heiko Baums wrote:
But let's try to get objective again.
No need. A new cron for [core] has to pass only one condition... :)
1) a developer is willing to maintain it.
So far that seems to be
:)
-Thomas S Hatch
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Friday, April 08, 2011 05:43:51 Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl
wrote:
And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
because users should
of the SELinux packages in the AUR) and find a home for a third
party SELinux repo.
-Thomas S Hatch
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 07.04.2011 04:30, schrieb Thomas S Hatch:
Right, both are viable choices, btw I will be migrating my datacenters
away
from dcron in the near future and doing a series of tests on cronie and
fcron, I will post my
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis grb...@xsmail.comwrote:
Yaro Kasear wrote:
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 18:13:04 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes the systemd topic keeps popping up, right now we don't know
if certain upstream
cronie also appears to be the nicest migration choice for users who are
not used to fcron. It seems to support anachron features, cron.d,
daily/weekly/etc, is able to actually keep time and works just like
expected whereas fcron has fcrontab with a slightly different syntax. We
could actually
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Corey Johns li...@n-co.de wrote:
fcron is pretty much the de facto cron of choice for anyone needing a cron
without special case needs. A nice general cron program.
I do wonder about the bureaucratic processes in place to facillitate such a
switch, though.
option, but
merits further investigation.
-Thomas S Hatch
-Arch Linux Trusted User
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Am Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:27:27 +0200
schrieb Thomas Bächler tho
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis grb...@xsmail.comwrote:
Thomas S Hatch wrote:
I am saving the include SELINUX support in base for a latter date
my understanding though is that the stated position of Arch was no
systemd
s/was/is/g
That is also my understanding
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:25:42 -0600
schrieb Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com:
As for adding SELinux support in base but keeping it turned off by
default, +1
Then you mean adding it to [core]. (base) is supposed
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:30:26 -0600
schrieb Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com:
dcron and fcron are not under active development,
fcron is under active development. It's just feature complete and
therefore not developed
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:57:58 -0600
schrieb Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com:
All I want is a good decision to be made and have a crond that is not
buggy. Therefore I think that it is foolish not to present
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
cronie has anacron features and I think is a good option.
Unfortunately cronie isn't even in [community] yet. I've been trying to get
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Am Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:25:42 -0600
schrieb Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, DrCR drcrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you guys elaborate on why you dislike selinux. I would
appreciate it. Do you prefer AppArmor, or do you dislike that as well?
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis grb...@xsmail.com
wrote:
As for adding
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:24 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 04:43 PM, Sander Jansen wrote:
This seems to be a monthly recurring discussion. How about not
providing any default, just put all the different cron(s) in extra?
I think eventually systemd
I can think of three considerations for a cron daemon:
1 . Minimal - its a cron daemon, it does not need to be complex
2. Active development
3. Anacron functionality
As far as I can see this leaves us with fcron, dcron and cronie. Cronie
probably has the highest assurance for upstream development
This is one of the best April fools day jobs I have ever seen, good job!
2011/3/25 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:22 PM, David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net
wrote:
Just wondering: what's the general policy about how often (and why)
kernel26-lts gets updated? I know it's supposed to be a long-term
supported kernel, making it
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Milos Negovanovic
milos.negovano...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
No. But what I understood from what Thomas said is: as you need to reboot
your server anyway from time to time to apply security updates, you
to collaboration!
-Thomas S Hatch
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you are familiar with a project spearheaded by Red Hat called Func,
Salt
is very similar.
On Thursday I released my first release
://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/6697
Thank you for your ideas!
-Thomas S Hatch
-Arch Linux Trusted User
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:43 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.mewrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am posting this to venture an opinion, and see if anyone has
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:58:19 -0600
Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
But regardless, this should support the Arch style runlevel.
maybe... in theory it's possible that in a month we switch to systemd
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Lee Burton lbur...@mrow.org wrote:
Append is okay (most likely dependencies are already in place for a
service), but it would be nice to specify dependencies / ensure
necessary services are running. We should allow the module writer /
administrator to
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:26:08 -0600
Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:58:19 -0600
Thomas S Hatch
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.mewrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Lee Burton lbur...@mrow.org wrote:
Append is okay (most likely dependencies are already in place
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think that the unfolding systemd issues here and the fact that we may
be
required to move to systemd might rewrite this problem
been nothing short of a pleasure.
-Thomas S Hatch
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:32 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
It works! After building kdebase (and fighting with other modules), I just
decided to start trinity and see if it would work. Changed ~/.xinitrc to
'startkde' and then typed 'startx' and:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Nicolás Reynolds fa...@kiwwwi.com.arwrote:
El 27/01/11 10:36, Thomas S Hatch dijo:
I have mentioned this subject before on aur-general, but I wanted to open
a
discussion about it in the broader community.
I have spent a great deal of my career working
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.orgwrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:10:34PM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
[..]
Yes, there sure is, there is a lot of backend code that I am working
on, but this is coming along!
I am still as much as a few months out from
S Hatch
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tavian Barnes taviana...@tavianator.comwrote:
On 2 February 2011 01:10, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On 02/01/2011 10:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
(3) Lastly, if anybody has interest, please look over the PKGBUILDs
and let me
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Tavian Barnes taviana...@tavianator.comwrote:
On 2 February 2011 13:25, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tavian Barnes
taviana...@tavianator.comwrote:
On 2 February 2011 01:10, David C. Rankin
drankina
definitely have ramifications on the software release process.
Thanks! Keep the comments coming!
-Thomas S Hatch
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.mewrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jakob, YES! You are spot on here, one of the main motivations behind a
system like this is security. While I don't think
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:49 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.mewrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me
wrote:
But with that said I feel very strongly that my wants
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Isaac Dupree
m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org wrote:
On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote:
Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could
theoretically check in a correct PKGBUILD but upload a binary package
with *insert malicious
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I
have
been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Isaac Dupree
m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org wrote:
On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote:
Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could
theoretically check
doing
it here,
Trinity uses FosWiki and it is miserable compared to mediawiki :)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Thanks David, I am excited to see it!
-Thomas S Hatch
know, my motivation should soar and I will make Arch
a super continuous package build system!
-Thomas S Hatch
-TU
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.orgwrote:
On 27/01/11 17:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
[...]
I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project
is
in demand. So
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 28 January 2011 01:36, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:01 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.mewrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
On 28 January 2011 01:36, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:01 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
We have been discussing this in the TU chat, and there is a lot of
excitement about it, I am going to post some degign docs on the wiki here
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:57 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.mewrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Awesome, I actually have a few servers I will use, and since it will be
distributed, we will be able to use a lot of servers as builders
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:57 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 28/01/11 03:36, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
I have been passively working on a similar project called quarters, but I
must admit that my motivation is somewhat low not knowing if the project
is
in demand. So here is my
76 matches
Mail list logo
