On 08/01/2012 08:28 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi,
please drop me an answer if you are interest in testing the next
archboot release.
Thanks
greetings
tpowa
sure
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/15/2012 10:18 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On 02/14/12 at 11:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The pacman upgrade didn't cause trouble here. When I run pacman -Syu the
first time, only pacman was shown. Directly after installing it I run
pacman -Syu again and there where 5 targets.
# ntpdate
On 01/06/2012 01:39 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
2012/1/5 Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.2 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer Package
On 11/18/2011 12:46 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
hi all,
there is a simple rebuild waiting for signoffs in testing. As this
packages does not have a single signoff since two weeks I am calling out
to everybody (Dev, TU and users) using it. Just let me know if the
package still does its
On 09/01/2011 11:48 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
New cups is sitting in testing now for some time. No bug reports so
far. It works fine for me. Any objections moving this to extra?
-Andy
works flawlessly here also (x86_64)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/30/2011 12:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
bump to latest version.
Please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
Signoff x64_64
Still extracts/installs as expected.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/22/2011 01:41 AM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:13:45PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote:
Hi,
lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.88-1 are in testing for upstream
update. Please test and signoff.
Eric
I
On 08/13/2011 04:35 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
Hi,
device-mapper/lvm2 2.02.87-1 are now in testing for an upstream
update. Please test and signoff. Signoffs from users are welcomed.
Thanks,
Eric
Re-build, Re-booted, Re-porting all well.
Signoff X86_64
On 08/02/2011 06:30 AM, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Dwight Schauer a écrit :
On 02/08/11 18:52, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Why is there an official arch pkg for msmtp but not for mpop?
Because something like fetchmail does the same thing as mpop?
It seems there are plenty reasons to prefer mpop over
On 08/01/2011 02:13 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
The kde4 updates today conflict with Trinity libkipi. I can't figure
out why?
:: libkipi and kdemod3-libkipi are in conflict. Remove kdemod3-libkipi?
[y/N]
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
Trinity 3.5.12 installs
On 06/30/2011 10:48 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking at the /lib64 folder and wondering what it is really
needed for... It just seems clutter to me on a pure x86_64 system (or
even with a multilib in lib32 folders like we have). As far as I can
tell, most things are perfectly
On 06/21/2011 04:33 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a
little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2011 08:06 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
I'd like to install GNOME for my freshly installed base system following
instructions provided on this page 'https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/
GNOME#Base'. As you can see it reads:
Install the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2011 12:43 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
{snip}
In general, if I need to make a package, I copy
a random PKGBUILD from abs, change the top couple lines, and then set
the build section to:
Now sure why you would copy a existing (possibly
On 12/19/2010 05:31 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 04/12/10 22:34, Allan McRae wrote:
Rebuild and tidy of old package.
Signoff both,
Allan
Anyone. User signoffs are all good too.
reiserfstune and reiserfsck still work fine here...
Signoff both archs
On 09/06/2010 11:29 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Upstream update, please sign off.
Can still boot to my LVM root so signoff x86_64.
On 09/06/2010 01:47 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 06.09.2010 21:30, schrieb jwbirdsong:
On 09/06/2010 11:29 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Upstream update, please sign off.
Can still boot to my LVM root so signoff x86_64.
Did you recreate your initramfs for the test?
Yes I did, sorry should
On 06/25/2010 11:54 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Hi,
Recently I've been going to my friends' house and installing arch on
their boxes. Some of them had high speed wireless dialup internet (3.1
megabytes/s is the max) which required wvdial, so I had to carry
wvdial's package in another pen
On 06/20/2010 09:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/06/10 13:04, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Andreas Radke
wrote:
Andreas Radke wrote:
This release works with udev for input hotplugging and supports
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/*.conf as a
On 06/16/2010 10:06 AM, Nicky726 wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:17:44 +0200
From: ?yvind Heggstadmrelen...@har-ikkje.net
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:47:16 +0530
Gaurish Sharmacont...@gaurishsharma.com wrote:
Hi,
I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
On 06/16/2010 10:06 AM, Nicky726 wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:17:44 +0200
From: ?yvind Heggstadmrelen...@har-ikkje.net
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:47:16 +0530
Gaurish Sharmacont...@gaurishsharma.com wrote:
Hi,
I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
On 05/28/2010 11:41 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Madhurya Kakatimkakati2...@gmail.com wrote:
This mailing list is only for discussing problems. Besides we use
arch-games repo ;)
On 5/28/10, Nilesh Govindarajanli...@itech7.com wrote:
Hi all,
It
On 05/13/2010 04:54 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:47 -0500, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Caleb Cushingxenoterrac...@gmail.comwrote:
I tried installing testing on a box running nvidia drivers that I have
at school. X didn't come up. I
On 05/09/2010 12:35 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 08/05/10 23:11, Matěj Týč wrote:
What's wrong with that pacmatic functionality that shomehow tries to
solve this, since it is not implemented in pacman?
pacmantic's functionality is Arch specific while pacman is not.
Message 29 in a thread that
On 04/24/2010 06:14 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 19/04/10 17:03, Allan McRae wrote:
Last rebuild was over a year ago.
Signoff both,
Allan
Anyone? User signoffs are fine.
Signoff x86_64
On 03/16/2010 10:54 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Ty Johnty...@eye-of-odin.com wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:08:22 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajanli...@itech7.com wrote:
USB mice have worked without hal for a long time. It's just
hotplugging that won't
On 03/01/2010 02:29 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:32:15AM -0700, jwbirdsong wrote:
Patch shadow your self w/ aforementioned gentoo patch. works fine
after building w/ the patch.
(maybe a completely stupid question)
Is there a systematic way to get
On 02/28/2010 03:23 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/28/2010 03:45 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Two things Wohoo, I'm free! - last home server moved to Arch! and second, Arch
has the same bug in the source of shadow src/groupmod.c that renders groupmod
unusable with pam enabled:
28 matches
Mail list logo
