On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/04/14 11:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell
group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages
officially instead?
It's definitely still
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
I would like to keep XMonad/XMobar in [community] it does seem to take up
a big chunk of the haskell-* packages we have in our repos. But I've never
ran into real big issues packaging haskell libraries, one minor issue
On 09/04/14 11:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 10/04/14 12:58, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.orgwrote:
I'm guessing this means cabal-install now is the only package outside
of [community] that uses ghc to build. Is that right?
That
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell
group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages
officially instead?
I wouldn't actually be opposed to this idea.
A lot of effort is
4 matches
Mail list logo
