Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Damjan
corresponding kernel bugzilla entries: i915 problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27572 ath9k problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31452 FYI: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-March/009741.html Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 26 März 2011 schrieb Damjan: corresponding kernel bugzilla entries: i915 problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27572 ath9k problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31452 FYI: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-March/009741.html

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. I guess 38.2 will have the patch. Are you sure? .38.2 review is already in progress. If you could send us a link to the patch, we could integrate it

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. I guess 38.2 will have the patch. Are you sure? .38.2 review is already in

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 26 März 2011 schrieb Evangelos Foutras: On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. I guess 38.2 will

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-25 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Mittwoch 23 März 2011 schrieb Sander Jansen: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Richard Schütz r.sc...@t-online.de wrote: Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz: Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-25 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message from Fri 25-Mar-11 20:35: Am Mittwoch 23 März 2011 schrieb Sander Jansen: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Richard Schütz r.sc...@t-online.de wrote: Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz: . I noticed that new X packages hit

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-24 Thread Bernardo Barros
2.6.38.1 is out :-)

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-24 Thread Bogdan
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:10, Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.comwrote: 2.6.38.1 is out :-) it's already in [testing], but ATM seems like patch-2.6.38.1-1-ARCH.bz2 is still missing from ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/kernel26/ :-(

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-23 Thread Sander Jansen
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Richard Schütz r.sc...@t-online.de wrote: Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz: Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - latest stable patches - disabled /dev/kmem - added AMD_IOMMU support - kernel image is now xz compressed - NUMA is enabled on x86_64 - AUTOSCHED (aka the wonder

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Damjan
please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Features included: - latest stable patches a bit offtopic, is there a special reason why there's a single big patch for the kernel, and at that one that's not versioned with the kernel package. A broken up patch would be much easier to analyze

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Damjan gdam...@gmail.com wrote: please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Features included: - latest stable patches a bit offtopic, is there a special reason why there's a single big patch for the kernel, and at that one that's not versioned with the

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 22.03.2011 16:14, schrieb Damjan: please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Features included: - latest stable patches a bit offtopic, is there a special reason why there's a single big patch for the kernel, and at that one that's not versioned with the kernel package. A broken

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Richard Schütz
Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - latest stable patches - disabled /dev/kmem - added AMD_IOMMU support - kernel image is now xz compressed - NUMA is

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Richard Schütz
Am 22.03.2011 17:27, schrieb Richard Schütz: Am 22.03.2011 15:31, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - latest stable patches - disabled /dev/kmem - added AMD_IOMMU support

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-22 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:40:58 +0100 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: We used to have lots of patches in the kernel (between 5 and 15), so a single -ARCH patch was created. Now, the number of patches is fairly small and I am thinking maybe we should go back to single patches.