On 08/02/2011 09:19 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
I haven't been able to make VMware Workstation 7.1.4 work with kernel
3.0-2.
Downgraded to 3.0-1 and works again.
Everything else seems to work fine.
Best Regards,
Guillermo
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
I haven't been able to make VMware Workstation 7.1.4 work with kernel 3.0-2.
Downgraded to 3.0-1 and works again.
Everything else seems to work fine.
Best Regards,
Guillermo Leira
On 08/02/2011 09:19 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
I haven't been able to make VMware Workstation 7.1.4 work with kernel 3.0-2.
Downgraded to 3.0-1 and works again.
Everything else seems to work fine.
Best Regards,
Guillermo Leira
Probably
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
Archlinux Changes:
- Rename the package kernel26 - linux
- Added replaces everywhere
-
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26`
package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't
around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package? or is this
a non-issue?
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
meh whatever :-) i guess i don't really care anyway since i would
never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for
the split originally ... though that reason is escaping me now
(providing said
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
meh whatever :-) i guess i don't really care anyway since i would
never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for
the split
On 08/02/11 12:52, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersent...@jklm.no wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risingeranth...@xtfx.me wrote:
... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26`
package was to also have a `kernel24`
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
Archlinux Changes:
- Rename the package kernel26 - linux
- Added replaces everywhere
- Removed old comments and vercmps from .install file
- Removed old comments and replaces from PKGBUILD
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
signoff x86_64
-t
No discussion here it's been decided!
- kernel name: vmlinuz-linux
- initramfs name: initramfs-linux.img
same for fallback of course.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
On 2011/8/1 Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
Using that for some days, signof i686.
--
Rémy.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
Signoff both.
13 matches
Mail list logo