On 2013-05-19, Bardur Arantsson s...@scientician.net wrote:
On 05/19/2013 10:44 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
You can subscribe to rss feeds of these forums and your rss reader will
then show you everything new in all the forums I'm a member of.
... feed readers aren't as good as handling
On 05/18/2013 08:34 PM, Joan Rieu wrote:
2013/5/18 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
This comes into my mind, when I read a statement about the policy of
Mint, thread: Fully wroking GTK3(+GTK2) theme for Gnome 3.8?
E.g. desktop environments require sometimes discussions that IMO don't
On 05/19/2013 10:44 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
You still have to actively go to the specific Arch forums to keep up
with replies, etc. There's no unified show me everything new in all the
forums I'm a member of page where I can go to keep up.
You can subscribe to rss feeds of these forums
On Sun, 19 May 2013 18:29:48 +0530, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
I agree that fragmentation would be self-defeating. If you would be
willing to host a real list, free from Google, it would be great :).
Goggle IMO is a cut both ways thingy.
apart from privacy issues,
Hallo,
IMO the moderated Arch general list became a good list for technically
issues and for briefly and succinctly objective discussions. This
shouldn't change. First I didn't like it, but now I can see the
advantages of such a list.
What IMO is missing for Arch Linux is a separated mailing
2013/5/18 Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
This comes into my mind, when I read a statement about the policy of
Mint, thread: Fully wroking GTK3(+GTK2) theme for Gnome 3.8?
E.g. desktop environments require sometimes discussions that IMO don't
belong to Arch general, but there perhaps
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 20:34 +0200, Joan Rieu wrote:
Long technical discussions are of course interesting, provided you care
about the topic, which is not always the case.
Hi Joan,
it's nearly impossible to discuss something and to stay objective and
straight to the topic, this only is
On Sat, 18 May 2013 18:27:03 +0200 Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
Hallo,
IMO the moderated Arch general list became a good list for technically
issues and for briefly and succinctly objective discussions. This
shouldn't change. First I didn't like it, but now I can see the
8 matches
Mail list logo
