On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 03:27:43 +0900, Ken OKABE via arch-general wrote:
>>What's completely missing by the kernel related explanation is, that
>>upstrem provides, IOW maintains longterm linux,
>>https://www.kernel.org/ . Does KDE upstream maintain KDE Plasma LTS?
>
>Ralf, exactly, and that is to wh
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 08:31:22 +0900, Ken OKABE via arch-general wrote:
> > The kernel is a different, as it can cause an unbootable situation.
>
> [...]
>
> On what reason or scenario, some LTS(maybe incompatible to the kernel)
> will break kernel or make the system unbootable?
Ideally never. T
>>The kernel is a different, as it can cause an unbootable situation.
I can only imagine as follows:
1-a linux boot succesfully
1-b linux-lte boot succesfully
2 TYY or some DM load successfully
3-a Plasma might fail to launch
3-b Plasma-LTS might fail to launch
On what reason or scenario, some
> Ralf, exactly, and that is to what I'm attracted.
That they maintain it doesn't necessarily mean that they will also make
sure that it works with new library versions. It sounded more like bug-
and security fixes to me.
Arch is not like Debian or even Ubuntu. Most libraries get updated as
soon
Bruno,
>Yes, but what if plasma-lts doesn’t build with the new libwhatever? Will
plasma-lts have updates that take care of this? Will they be available
ahead of libwhatever release?
>Then, consider the number of package plasma-lts represents. Multiply by
their number of dependencies. Especially, k
On 11/18/2016 12:46 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:34:08 +0900
> Ken OKABE via arch-general wrote:
>
>> What kind of scenario in the real world to be problematic to maintain
>> KDE Plasma LTS line as separated packages from non-LTS?
>
> A whole lot more work for litte/no gain.
>What's completely missing by the kernel related explanation is, that
upstrem provides, IOW maintains longterm linux,
https://www.kernel.org/ . Does KDE upstream maintain KDE Plasma LTS?
Ralf, exactly, and that is to what I'm attracted.
https://community.kde.org/Schedules/Plasma_5
According to the
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:34:08 +0900
Ken OKABE via arch-general wrote:
> What kind of scenario in the real world to be problematic to maintain
> KDE Plasma LTS line as separated packages from non-LTS?
A whole lot more work for litte/no gain. The kernel is a different, as it can
cause an unbootable
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:34:08 +0900, Ken OKABE via arch-general wrote:
>What kind of scenario in the real world to be problematic to maintain
>KDE Plasma LTS line as separated packages from non-LTS?
Apart from the policy, the problem are maintainers willing it to do and
to provide it by a third par
Le 18/11/2016 à 18:34, Ken OKABE via arch-general a écrit :
> Arch-wiki suggests:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/System_maintenance#Install_the_linux-lts_package
>> Tips and tricks
> The following tips are generally not required, but certain users may
> find them useful.
>> Install the lin
Arch-wiki suggests:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/System_maintenance#Install_the_linux-lts_package
>Tips and tricks
The following tips are generally not required, but certain users may
find them useful.
>Install the linux-lts package
The linux-lts package is an alternative Arch kernel packag
11 matches
Mail list logo
