On 9 May 2014 00:22, Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com wrote:
You already made it quite personal by promoting FUD with gems like this:
systemd's team is noticeably chauvinistic
Good grace, you pasted a quote I didn't make and made it appear as
mine or as if I approved it, whilst I was very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/09/2014 01:41 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
On 09/05/14 01:29 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
To Daniel,
I'm pointing out that respect for people shouldn't affect technical
skepticism. People can rant against whomever they want as long as it has
On 09/05/14 02:02 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
On 05/09/2014 01:41 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
On 09/05/14 01:29 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
To Daniel,
I'm pointing out that respect for people shouldn't affect technical
skepticism. People can rant against whomever they want as long as it has
technical
Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
directory daily. This is not something that I like as I prefer to decide
when to clean up and to manually perform the clean up.
I have tried
systemctl stop
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Olivier Langlois
oliv...@olivierlanglois.net wrote:
Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
directory daily. This is not something that I like as I prefer to
On 8 May 2014 09:43, Olivier Langlois oliv...@olivierlanglois.net wrote:
Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
directory daily. This is not something that I like as I prefer to decide
when to
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Christos Nouskas n...@archlinux.us wrote:
On 8 May 2014 09:43, Olivier Langlois oliv...@olivierlanglois.net wrote:
Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
On Thursday 08 May 2014 09:53:41 Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Christos Nouskas n...@archlinux.us wrote:
On 8 May 2014 09:43, Olivier Langlois oliv...@olivierlanglois.net wrote:
Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
new systemd
-Original Message-
From: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] On Behalf
Of Lukas Jirkovsky
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:54 AM
Please don't start another systemd flamewar. And BTW, automatic /tmp
cleaning was there since the beginning.
I agree to not start a
Hi,
On Thu, 08 May 2014 02:43:57 -0400
Olivier Langlois oliv...@olivierlanglois.net wrote:
Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
directory daily. This is not something that I like as I
On 08/05/14 11:44 AM, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote:
-Original Message-
From: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] On Behalf
Of Lukas Jirkovsky
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:54 AM
Please don't start another systemd flamewar. And BTW, automatic /tmp
cleaning
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:44:51PM +, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote:
I was forecasting that this comment would come when I wrote the
original request. While I agree with what you say, I think that it is
reasonable to let the user have the control over when it is cleaned.
Without
On 08/05/14 03:46 AM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
On 8 May 2014 09:43, Olivier Langlois oliv...@olivierlanglois.net wrote:
Since a recent update (I have first noticed a couple of weeks ago this
new systemd enhancement), systemd started to automatically clean /tmp
directory daily. This is not
This is not a rant against Arch or its devs and community, but against
systemd; the sad facts speak for themselves.
This is a rant against the Arch devs and the Arch community. Several of
the developers and several people involved with the community are
systemd developers, and there is
On 08/05/14 05:01 PM, Nowaker wrote:
This is not a rant against Arch or its devs and community, but against
systemd; the sad facts speak for themselves.
This is a rant against the Arch devs and the Arch community. Several of
the developers and several people involved with the community are
I guess you'll be upset that Tom (one of the Arch developers) wrote
systemd-networkd.
You guess wrong.
You'll probably also be upset that there's going to be
a simple systemd-console from the kmscon developer (who is an Arch user)
and a systemd-timesyncd for basic NTP clients not needing a
On 08/05/14 05:10 PM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
I guess you'll be upset that Tom (one of the Arch developers) wrote
systemd-networkd.
You guess wrong.
So you're okay with it providing networking, but not timer units? Timer
units were a very simple addition on top of the existing event loop,
Do accept the fact that not everyone is content with everything
systemd and just leave it at that. Thank you and bye.
--
X
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=mK=nous
http://tiny.cc/linux-pf
On 08/05/14 05:37 PM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
Do accept the fact that not everyone is content with everything
systemd and just leave it at that. Thank you and bye.
That can be expressed without calling the developers chauvanistic and
spreading misinformation. It's yet a free software project
On 08/05/14 03:40 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
[0] http://boycottsystemd.org/
There are no facts there. I already responded to this FUD on reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/24zj10/what_are_the_benefits_of_partitioning_disk_space/chcao5u
Whoops, wrong link:
Op 8 mei 2014 21:41 schreef Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com het
volgende:
[...]
and a systemd-timesyncd for basic NTP clients not needing a full blown
server with complicated RTC handling.
Just for the record: that is what is called sntp (Simple ntp). Ntp is about
clock sync, sntp just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/2014 05:22 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
On 08/05/14 05:10 PM, Christos Nouskas wrote:
I guess you'll be upset that Tom (one of the Arch developers) wrote
systemd-networkd.
You guess wrong.
So you're okay with it providing networking, but
On 09/05/14 01:01 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
To all,
Don't make any of this personal. In addition, I hope the inclusion of
systemd in Arch Linux has more justification than just some Arch
developers are also Systemd developers. Arch may not be a democracy, but
it's not supposed to be infested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/09/2014 01:22 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
On 09/05/14 01:01 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
To all,
Don't make any of this personal. In addition, I hope the inclusion of
systemd in Arch Linux has more justification than just some Arch
developers are
On 09/05/14 01:29 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
To Daniel,
I'm pointing out that respect for people shouldn't affect technical
skepticism. People can rant against whomever they want as long as it has
technical criticism (at least on this mailing list).
Accusing the developers of bad faith and
25 matches
Mail list logo
