Am Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:46:08 -0600
schrieb mike lojkovic via arch-general :
> As far as I'm aware BTRFS would be a better choice. Believe it's
> getting close to release.
Honestly, I don't agree. NILFS has features that Btrfs will never have,
simply because of it's
As far as I'm aware BTRFS would be a better choice. Believe it's getting
close to release.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Alexander Rath
wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2017 17:20:49 CET schrieb Sean Greenslade:
>
>> On January 9, 2017 7:39:26 AM PST, Alexander Rath <
Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2017 17:20:49 CET schrieb Sean Greenslade:
On January 9, 2017 7:39:26 AM PST, Alexander Rath
wrote:
Hello!
I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:
On 09-01-2017 15:39, Alexander Rath wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:
> https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15091
>
> Did anybody try to install Arch on a NILFS2-formatted partition?
Hello!
I'd like to share a link to this description/tutorial about NILFS2:
https://forum.manjaro.org/t/nilfs-a-filesystem-designed-to-minimize-the-likelyhood-of-data-loss/15091
Did anybody try to install Arch on a NILFS2-formatted partition?
Best regards,
Alexander
5 matches
Mail list logo