On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
ah yes, SSL! sorry :)
On 2006-05-01 22:34:12, Ulf Möller, openssl developer [1], responded
[2] to openssl packager Kurt Roeckx [3] saying that he was for
applying the patch just to keep valgrind quiet.
But openssl
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Andres P aep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
ah yes, SSL! sorry :)
On 2006-05-01 22:34:12, Ulf Möller, openssl developer [1], responded
[2] to openssl packager Kurt Roeckx [3] saying that he
I've created a Google Group here for discussion around creating an Arch
Security Team:
http://groups.google.com/group/arch-security
Please join it if you're interested. The reason for this group is in
response to my rejected suggestion for an arch-security mailing list.
I'll CC any policy or
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk wrote:
I've created a Google Group here for discussion around creating an Arch
Security Team:
http://groups.google.com/group/arch-security
Please join it if you're interested. The reason for this group is in
response to
Cool. I just joined.
-Miah
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk
wrote:
I've created a Google Group here for discussion around creating an Arch
Security Team:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:45:17 -0500
Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like a blast from the past:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Security_Task_Force
http://code.google.com/p/arch-sheriff/
Best of luck this time around.
-Dan
As I've mentioned before, I don't think getting
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:57:56 +0200, Ananda Samaddar
ana...@samaddar.co.uk wrote:
1. Check for vulnerabilities
2. Know how to use PKGBUILDS and abs
3. Can spare some time to send announcements, create interim PKGBUILDs
and file security issues on the bug tracker.
1. [testing] users do that
I think there is much more that can be done besides the short list from
Ananda. The thing you have to remember is that security does not mean I'm
running the newest code..
Things to remember:
1. There is no such thing as secure.
2. Proper security consists of multiple layers of defense.
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:35:19 +0200, Miah Johnson m...@chia-pet.org wrote:
Things to remember:
1. There is no such thing as secure.
2. Proper security consists of multiple layers of defense.
Additional examples of things the AST could do:
1. Propose changes to default configuration files to be
Comments interspersed on a few points.
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 15:35 -0700, Miah Johnson wrote:
I think there is much more that can be done besides the short list from
Ananda. The thing you have to remember is that security does not mean I'm
running the newest code..
Things to remember:
1.
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:00:57 +0200, Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com wrote:
My OPINION is that Arch is not a distro for those who do not want to do
regular total updates. Of course, some have individual packages in
NoUpgrade, but the number of problems which crop up which come down to
you didn't run
On Friday 18 of June 2010 00:35:19 Miah Johnson wrote:
I think there is much more that can be done besides the short list from
Ananda. The thing you have to remember is that security does not mean
I'm running the newest code..
Things to remember:
1. There is no such thing as secure.
2.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.ukwrote:
I've created a Google Group here for discussion around creating an Arch
Security Team:
http://groups.google.com/group/arch-security
Please join it if you're interested. The reason for this group is in
response to
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:33 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
security is the responsibility of those deploying, not those
packaging. it requires end-to-end oversight and complete
configuration toward a specific and particular purpose; something that
is not possible for those
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:33 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
security is the responsibility of those deploying, not those
packaging. it requires end-to-end oversight and complete
configuration toward
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Andres P aep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:33 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
security is the responsibility of those deploying, not those
packaging.
16 matches
Mail list logo
