Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Il 04/07/2016 18:35, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > We have three places where this can come from... > > https://git.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/lib/libalpm/signing.c#n1008 > https://git.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/lib/libalpm/signing.c#n1038 >

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini on Mon, 2016/07/04 11:58: > Il 03/07/2016 23:50, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > > > The db file is just a simple tar archive, compressed with gzip. Unzip it > > and you will find a directory for every package. Every directory

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Il 03/07/2016 23:50, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > Looks like the build service produces invalid db files, > home_ItachiSan_archlinux_Arch_Extra.db in your case. > > The db file is just a simple tar archive, compressed with gzip. Unzip it and > you will find a directory for every package.

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini via arch-general on Sun, 2016/07/03 10:09: > Good morning, > some days ago I found a nice service called "Open Build Service", which > allows all kind of packagers, including also Arch ones, to have > different repos of their packages,

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Il 03/07/2016 18:03, Jelle van der Waa ha scritto: > On 07/03/16 at 02:45pm, Ilya Boka via arch-general wrote: >> I don't know does it make sence, but you create signature with >> "makepkg --sign" ? > > Nope, > > He is using OpenSuse's Build Service, which creates a private key per > repository.

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

I don't know does it make sence, but you create signature with "makepkg --sign" ? On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini via arch-general wrote: > Good morning, > some days ago I found a nice service called "Open Build Service", which > allows

[arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

Good morning, some days ago I found a nice service called "Open Build Service", which allows all kind of packagers, including also Arch ones, to have different repos of their packages, having them built online. This is awesome for me, as some of them require heavy building time. I fought a bit