Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-15 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general
You are right, I shall not follow drama up on comments like these. If a message looks malicious I shall simply skip reading it, and silently filter re-incident people.

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-15 Thread Emil Lundberg via arch-general
On 2019-10-15 14:23, Fabian Piribauer via arch-general wrote: > It's debetable if calling a idea stupid is rude, but just cutting off > all communication because you feel offended is not the way to go. If he > really wanted to improve things, he should have noted the tone as side > note after

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-15 Thread Fabian Piribauer via arch-general
> On 2019-10-14 17:22, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:17:09 +0200 > > Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > > > >> Robin Broda: > >>> This is universally stupid. > >> abrasiveness = blockage > >> > > LOL, blocking a TU who's making valid points. > > >

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-15 Thread Emil Lundberg via arch-general
Maybe it's just me, but I don't think it seems appropriate for a TU to respond like that to a member of the community. It's certainly doesn't make for a welcoming atmosphere. Even though Arch is not for everyone, there's no need to actively drive people away by being rude. I also don't think

[arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-15 Thread Maksim Fomin via arch-general
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, October 14, 2019 8:59 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > Video-reply https://youtu.be/a_CNx63kLxk Why so serious? Seriously, why is this thread not nuked?

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Iyán Méndez Veiga
El lunes, 14 de octubre de 2019 23:13:15 (CEST) Yaro Kasear escribió: > On 10/14/19 3:59 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > > Video-reply I really don't like your attitute and nonverbal communication (that finger pointing all the time... so

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Aaron Laws via arch-general
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:59 PM Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Video-reply > "no matter how much you know, you don't know everything" has nothing to do with Robin's most egregious trespass: "This is universally

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Yaro Kasear
On 10/14/19 3:59 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > Video-reply For someone who "can handle disagreement" like you claim in your video, you sure are protesting quite a bit over it. I also have a hard time someone is really extending a hand in good

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general
Video-reply

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general
Em outubro 14, 2019 12:41 Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general escreveu: As said, blocked the latest three. We can either have a constructive conversation or it's over, that simple. Make your choice. Please, block me as well. Or, go even further and block anyone with an @archlinux.org

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Yaro Kasear
On 10/14/19 10:41 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > As said, blocked the latest three. > > We can either have a constructive conversation or it's over, that > simple. Make your choice. > Blocking people who respond negatively to your proposal is a great way to get people to

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general
As said, blocked the latest three. We can either have a constructive conversation or it's over, that simple. Make your choice.

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Doug Newgard via arch-general
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:17:09 +0200 Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > Robin Broda: > > This is universally stupid. > abrasiveness = blockage > LOL, blocking a TU who's making valid points. This thread was going nowhere in the first place, so I guess it doesn't matter.

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Óscar García Amor via arch-general
El lun., 14 oct. 2019 a las 17:17, Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general () escribió: > > Robin Broda: > > This is universally stupid. > abrasiveness = blockage Please, don't feed the troll and ignore this thread. Greetings. -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general
Robin Broda: This is universally stupid. abrasiveness = blockage

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Robin Broda via arch-general
On 10/14/19 4:48 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > I want to suggest including all or some of these in the package guidelines > , or the > appropriate documentation: > > > *New items:* > > - Write your PKGBUILD

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Emil Lundberg via arch-general
On 2019-10-14 16:48, Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general wrote: > - Start new variables and functions names with a capital letter, to > avoid clashes with those in makepkg itself. Isn't there an existing convention to use an underscore prefix (`_pkgname`) for this? /Emil

[arch-general] Package guidelines 

2019-10-14 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella via arch-general
I want to suggest including all or some of these in the package guidelines , or the appropriate documentation: *New items:* - Write your PKGBUILD in a way that will work by itself as long as possible, for example by

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines for apps requiring a specific Java version

2014-10-12 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On 5 October 2014 02:09, Maxwell Anselm silverhammer...@gmail.com wrote: What is the name/URL of this app? It's the GURPS character sheet: http://gurpscharactersheet.com/ I have a github repo for my WIP AUR package: https://github.com/silverhammermba/gcs If building on a box where

Re: [arch-general] Package guidelines for apps requiring a specific Java version

2014-10-04 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On 2 October 2014 18:41, Maxwell Anselm silverhammer...@gmail.com wrote: I'm working on a PKGBUILD for a Java app that must be built and run using Java 8, but I couldn't find any guidelines on best practices for such a situation. The easy part is including 'java-environment=8' and

[arch-general] Package guidelines for apps requiring a specific Java version

2014-10-04 Thread Maxwell Anselm
What is the name/URL of this app? It's the GURPS character sheet: http://gurpscharactersheet.com/ I have a github repo for my WIP AUR package: https://github.com/silverhammermba/gcs If building on a box where multiple JVM can be installed: build scripts for Java apps usually provide a

[arch-general] Package guidelines for apps requiring a specific Java version

2014-10-02 Thread Maxwell Anselm
I'm working on a PKGBUILD for a Java app that must be built and run using Java 8, but I couldn't find any guidelines on best practices for such a situation. The easy part is including 'java-environment=8' and 'java-runtime=8' in makedepends and depends respectively, but how to ensure the right