On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:22:24AM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 22:04 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
GStreamer is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling
components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis
playback, audio/video
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 22:37 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:22:24AM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 22:04 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
GStreamer is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling
components. The applications it
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:26:33 -0500
David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
It still amazes me how people will take the position that all
associated with Gnome must be 'crap'. No don't get me wrong, I have
no arguments with your basic complaint that unnecessary dependencies
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 15:34 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
Is there some reason that the gstreamer good plugins set needs a whole
load of GNOME crap?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/
I've recently switched to XFCE and I'd like to avoid GNOME
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:14:56 +0300
Hussam Al-Tayeb ht990...@gmail.com wrote:
Won't xfce be switching to GNOME crap like gvfs? :P
That's only an optional dependency for Thunar if I remember correctly.
I'm still trying to find out about that as I don't want to end up with
a whole bunch of GNOME
On 21/04/10 19:25, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:14:56 +0300
Hussam Al-Tayebht990...@gmail.com wrote:
Won't xfce be switching to GNOME crap like gvfs? :P
That's only an optional dependency for Thunar if I remember correctly.
I'm still trying to find out about that as I don't
On 21/04/10 09:28, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:26:33 -0500
David C. Rankindrankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
It still amazes me how people will take the position that all
associated with Gnome must be 'crap'. No don't get me wrong, I have
no arguments with your
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 19:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/04/10 19:25, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:14:56 +0300
Hussam Al-Tayebht990...@gmail.com wrote:
Won't xfce be switching to GNOME crap like gvfs? :P
That's only an optional dependency for Thunar if I remember
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:35:11 +0100
Nathan Wayde kum...@konnichi.com wrote:
Do you mind listing these Gnome dependencies, or at least your
proposed PKGBUILD?
I've looked at this and I can see only 2 (gconf and libsoup-gnome).
Ofcourse that is based on the assumption that the pacma
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:35 +0100, Nathan Wayde wrote:
Do you mind listing these Gnome dependencies, or at least your
proposed
PKGBUILD?
I've looked at this and I can see only 2 (gconf and libsoup-gnome).
Ofcourse that is based on the assumption that the pacma dependencies
are
Excerpts from Ananda Samaddar's message of 2010-04-20 16:34:21 +0200:
Is there some reason that the gstreamer good plugins set needs a whole
load of GNOME crap?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/
I've recently switched to XFCE and I'd like to avoid
On 21/04/10 10:52, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:35 +0100, Nathan Wayde wrote:
Do you mind listing these Gnome dependencies, or at least your
proposed
PKGBUILD?
I've looked at this and I can see only 2 (gconf and libsoup-gnome).
Ofcourse that is based on the assumption that the
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:19:47 +0200
Philipp hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
I'm with you on this, the gnome dependencies of this package annoyed
me a couple of times and is the reason why I avoid using gstreamer
wherever possibly.
A multimedia backend that depends on a specific desktop
On 04/21/2010 03:28 AM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
Yes it was an unfortunate choice of words. I don't think GNOME is crap,
I'm just not enamoured with the direction it seems to be headed in,
i.e. GNOME Shell. I can do without shiny stuff like that. Previous to
my switching to XFCE I was a
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:59:17PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
I appreciate the desire for a minimal system. What I don't understand is
the vilifying of packages just because they're part of a standard Gnome
install.
That's not the point. According to the definition on
the gstreamer website
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 22:04 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:59:17PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
I appreciate the desire for a minimal system. What I don't understand is
the vilifying of packages just because they're part of a standard Gnome
install.
That's not
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 06:22 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Would you prefer the developer reimplement security-authorization and a
configuration parser, then? Its not even as if gconf and its editor
aren't separated into different packages.
As long as GNOME doesn't start using it, that would be
Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of 2010-04-22 00:22:24 +0200:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 22:04 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:59:17PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
I appreciate the desire for a minimal system. What I don't understand is
the vilifying of packages
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 00:37 +0200, Philipp wrote:
Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of 2010-04-22 00:22:24 +0200:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 22:04 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:59:17PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
I appreciate the desire for a minimal system.
Is there some reason that the gstreamer good plugins set needs a whole
load of GNOME crap?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/
I've recently switched to XFCE and I'd like to avoid GNOME
dependencies. Is it possible to recompile from abs without all these
Am Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:34:21 +0100
schrieb Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk:
Is there some reason that the gstreamer good plugins set needs a whole
load of GNOME crap?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/
I've recently switched to XFCE and I'd
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:40:27 +0200
Thomas Haider t.hai...@vcnc.org wrote:
Am Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:34:21 +0100
schrieb Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk:
Is there some reason that the gstreamer good plugins set needs a
whole load of GNOME crap?
22 matches
Mail list logo
