Re: [arch-general] ibus has been out-of-date for over a month

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 12:02 AM Felix Yan wrote: > > ibus 1.5.23+1+gdd4cc5b0-1 has been pushed into [testing]. Sorry for the > delay. Excellent, thank you! I just installed ibus 1.5.23 from [testing] and it is working great. -Alex

Re: [arch-general] ibus has been out-of-date for over a month

On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 14:55 -0600, Alex Henrie wrote: > Dear Arch maintainers, > > ibus 1.5.23 was released at the end of last month,[1] but Arch is > still on 1.5.22.[2] Could you please update the package? ibus 1.5.23+1+gdd4cc5b0-1 has been pushed into [testing]. Sorry for the delay. -- Regar

[arch-general] ibus has been out-of-date for over a month

Dear Arch maintainers, ibus 1.5.23 was released at the end of last month,[1] but Arch is still on 1.5.22.[2] Could you please update the package? The new version supports compose rules that output multiple codepoints,[3] which I need to type certain Greek characters such as "ᾱ̈́". -Alex [1] https

Re: [arch-general] IBus Qt

Sure, please add the information on archwiki. BTW I get most this information from this comment by csslayer: https://github.com/flatpak/freedesktop-sdk-images/issues/43#issuecomment-343030611 Csslayer is the main developper of fcitx, and [his blog](https://www.csslayer.info/wordpress/tag/fcitx/)

Re: [arch-general] IBus Qt

I could not have asked for a better explanation. Thank you very much. Some of this should be mentioned on the wiki page. Would you like to add it? Would it be all right if I added the information, referencing this mailing list post? On 2018年05月10日 13時34分, Jiachen YANG via arch-general wrote

Re: [arch-general] IBus Qt

On 2018年05月10日 10:30, Grady Martin via arch-general wrote: > From : > >> Additionally, to enable IBus for Qt applications, install the ibus-qt >> library. > > Since 2012, I have used IBus with Qt applications and have yet to > encounter a single problem,

[arch-general] IBus Qt

From : Additionally, to enable IBus for Qt applications, install the ibus-qt library. Since 2012, I have used IBus with Qt applications and have yet to encounter a single problem, yet I have never installed ibus-qt. Can anyone clarify this stateme

Re: [arch-general] ibus

On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 15:53:10 -0600, Bigby James wrote: > On 12/05, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Hi Marcel, hi Rasmus :) > > > > On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:34:29 +0100, Marcel Röthke wrote: > > > You can remove all unneeded dependencies with the following > > > command. "pacman -Qdtq | pacman -Rs -" > > > >

Re: [arch-general] ibus

On 12/05, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi Marcel, hi Rasmus :) > > On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:34:29 +0100, Marcel Röthke wrote: > > You can remove all unneeded dependencies with the following command. > > "pacman -Qdtq | pacman -Rs -" > > Some unneeded packages might be build time dependencies, I don't want

Re: [arch-general] ibus

On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 16:41:38 +0100, Damjan Georgievski wrote: > On 5 December 2014 at 16:24, Ralf Mardorf > wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:58:10 +0800, Felix Yan wrote: > >> It was a dependency of gnome-settings-daemon until 3.10.2-3, when > >> the ibus package was split and the dependency was u

Re: [arch-general] ibus

On 5 December 2014 at 16:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:58:10 +0800, Felix Yan wrote: >> It was a dependency of gnome-settings-daemon until 3.10.2-3, when the >> ibus package was split and the dependency was updated to libibus. > > I tested Mate and Cinnamon, they are still insta

Re: [arch-general] ibus

On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:58:10 +0800, Felix Yan wrote: > It was a dependency of gnome-settings-daemon until 3.10.2-3, when the > ibus package was split and the dependency was updated to libibus. I tested Mate and Cinnamon, they are still installed, but I don't use them at the moment. Likely it was a

Re: [arch-general] ibus

Hi Marcel, hi Rasmus :) On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:34:29 +0100, Marcel Röthke wrote: > You can remove all unneeded dependencies with the following command. > "pacman -Qdtq | pacman -Rs -" Some unneeded packages might be build time dependencies, I don't want to remove and others might be needed for so

Re: [arch-general] ibus

On Friday, December 05, 2014 14:15:05 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > I'm surprised why ibus is installed on my machine. > > Is ibus needed for anything on my machine? > The package claims that it was "Installed as a dependency for another > package", but no package seems to need it. It was a depe

Re: [arch-general] ibus

On 2014-12-05 14:15, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > I'm surprised why ibus is installed on my machine. > > Is ibus needed for anything on my machine? > The package claims that it was "Installed as a dependency for another > package", but no package seems to need it. > > $ pacman -Qi ibus > Name

Re: [arch-general] ibus

Am 05.12.2014 um 14:15 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > Hi, > > I'm surprised why ibus is installed on my machine. > > Is ibus needed for anything on my machine? > The package claims that it was "Installed as a dependency for another > package", but no package seems to need it. > > $ pacman -Qi ibus > Na

[arch-general] ibus

Hi, I'm surprised why ibus is installed on my machine. Is ibus needed for anything on my machine? The package claims that it was "Installed as a dependency for another package", but no package seems to need it. $ pacman -Qi ibus Name : ibus Version: 1.5.9-4 Required By: Non

Re: [arch-general] ibus-table dependency

On 09/01/11 13:27, Auguste Pop wrote: Hi, The ibus-table package in community repository has several "python2 fix" sed lines in PKGBUILD. However, the dependency of ibus-table includes python-pyenchant, which is a python3 package. Should we change the dependency into python2-pyenchant? Thank yo

[arch-general] ibus-table dependency

Hi, The ibus-table package in community repository has several "python2 fix" sed lines in PKGBUILD. However, the dependency of ibus-table includes python-pyenchant, which is a python3 package. Should we change the dependency into python2-pyenchant? Thank you for your attention. Best Regards,