Daniel Wallace said the following at 06/18/2012 02:39 PM :
Say no to upgrading pacman first. also, SyncFirst is being removed
whenever the next pacman comes out
Thank you. That worked.
Perhaps something should be said about this in the wiki entry? It seems to me
that anyone installing on to
I am getting a failure when attempting to install 64-bit arch as the main OS
on my principal desktop system.
I am following the instructions at
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Software_RAID_and_LVM, since I have two
brand-new 2TB drives that I want to use in RAID1.
1. I have downloaded and
Can you give the precise error message? Some of the packages (e.g.) filesystem
need to be installed with --force, because they overwrite files that were
previously automatically generated etc. See the news on the main website for
more details.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, D. R. Evans wrote:
I am
Say no to upgrading pacman first. also, SyncFirst is being removed
whenever the next pacman comes out
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2012-February/015123.html
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:34:20PM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
I am getting a failure when attempting to install
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:34:20PM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
I am getting a failure when attempting to install 64-bit arch as the main OS
on my principal desktop system.
I am following the instructions at
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Software_RAID_and_LVM, since I have two
5 matches
Mail list logo