Re: [arch-general] KDE 4.7beta1 in [kde-unstable]

2011-05-26 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 05/25/2011 07:31 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: Hi all, the first beta of the new major release of KDE 4.7 is out and is already packaged in [kde-unstable]. That was quick! Works awesome here, in fact, a few of the quirks I experienced got fixed. Good job! -- Sven-Hendrik

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 05/26/2011 06:46 AM, cantabile wrote: On 05/26/2011 07:28 AM, XeCycle wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:46PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote: Perhaps we may provide alternative kernels? With names like these, we may get a brand new project named Arch Operating System, providing Linux, BSD,

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.05.2011 06:28, schrieb XeCycle: Perhaps we may provide alternative kernels? With names like these, we may get a brand new project named Arch Operating System, providing Linux, BSD, Hurd or even more as kernels, and users are free to choose any one. Well, this is really interesting. It'd

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread mathieu p
2011/5/25, cantabile cantabile.d...@gmail.com: On 05/25/2011 09:36 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 25 May 2011 23:38, Heiko Baumsli...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Linux3.0 can easily cause misunderstandings as Linux is usually used as a generic term for the whole system, the distros, etc. even if the

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread XeCycle
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 26.05.2011 06:28, schrieb XeCycle: Perhaps we may provide alternative kernels? With names like these, we may get a brand new project named Arch Operating System, providing Linux, BSD, Hurd or even more as kernels, and

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Víctor
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:28 AM, XeCycle xecy...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:46PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote: Hi there, There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is going to be 3.0. Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Yaro Kasear
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 02:57:49 Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 26.05.2011 06:28, schrieb XeCycle: Perhaps we may provide alternative kernels? With names like these, we may get a brand new project named Arch Operating System, providing Linux, BSD, Hurd or even more as kernels, and users are

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.05.2011 14:48, schrieb Yaro Kasear: On Thursday, May 26, 2011 02:57:49 Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 26.05.2011 06:28, schrieb XeCycle: Perhaps we may provide alternative kernels? With names like these, we may get a brand new project named Arch Operating System, providing Linux, BSD, Hurd or

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Paulo Santos
Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 26.05.2011 14:48, schrieb Yaro Kasear: On Thursday, May 26, 2011 02:57:49 Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 26.05.2011 06:28, schrieb XeCycle: Perhaps we may provide alternative kernels? With names like these, we may get a brand new project named Arch Operating System,

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Filip Filipov
about proposal to the linux name change. I don't label my car by my engine name, or label my engine by my car name , do you?

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 26 May 2011 19:02, Filip Filipov pilif.pi...@googlemail.com wrote: about proposal to  the  linux name change. I don't label my car by my engine name, or label my engine by my car name , do you? Linux is the name of the kernel so using linux as the name of the kernel package would be correct.

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.38.7-1

2011-05-26 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Donnerstag 26 Mai 2011 schrieb Bogdan Ionuț: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 22:03, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.39 currently resides there), but at: http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/kernel26/ please signoff for both arches.

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Filip Filipov
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 19:34, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.comwrote: Linux is the name of the kernel so using linux as the name of the kernel package would be correct. After all, the tarballs on kernel.org are named linux-{version}. :) yes. My idea was that if you look at it, at an

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Vytautas Stankevičius
On Thursday 26 of May 2011 21:19:36 Filip Filipov wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 19:34, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.comwrote: Linux is the name of the kernel so using linux as the name of the kernel package would be correct. After all, the tarballs on kernel.org are named

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] netcfg 2.5.5-1

2011-05-26 Thread Rémy Oudompheng
On 2011/5/23 Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote: version 2.5.5 - new connection types: openvpn (FS#21490), vlan - new option HIDDEN (for hidden SSIDs) - new option SKIPNOCARRIER (FS#21755) - default WPA driver is now nl80211 - minor fixes and improvements (FS#17190, FS#17546,  

Re: [arch-general] Future of 'kernel26'

2011-05-26 Thread Marek Otahal
On Thursday 26 of May 2011 23:18:29 Vytautas Stankevičius wrote: On Thursday 26 of May 2011 21:19:36 Filip Filipov wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 19:34, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.comwrote: Linux is the name of the kernel so using linux as the name of the kernel package would be